Home     Writers     Op/Ed     Book Reviews     News     Bookstore     Photoshops     Submit     Search     Contact Us     Advertise  
  You are here: 





Stewart in Leg-irons; the latest victory in the war on terror
Wednesday, 18 October 2006 10:54

By Mike Whitney

“She has represented the poor, the disadvantaged and the unpopular….It is no exaggeration to say that Ms. Stewart performed a public service not only to her clients but her nation.” Judge John G. Koeltl; Federal District Court, Manhattan, NY
So far, Bush’s only triumph in his muddled war on terror has been locking up the two Stewart Sisters, Lynne and Martha. (They’re not really sisters) Neither posed any threat to national security, but that’s beside the point. Their arrest sends a chilling message to “home-decoration mavens” and 67 year old cancer patients that they’d better “watch their step” or they’ll find themselves in prison-pinstripes.

Do Americans really see how crazy this is or have we been so subsumed in “terror-hysteria” that we’ve lost our sense of humor altogether?

Consider this: while attorney Stewart is tottering off to prison for defending a “blind Sheik”, a tan and rested Bin Laden is somewhere in the Pakistan-outback working on golf swing and his memoirs?

Does that make any sense?

Only if the real objective is to intimidate lawyers who defend unpopular clients rather than nailing terrorists.

Known and very popular cialis coupon which gives all the chance to receive a discount for a preparation which has to be available and exactly cialis coupons has been found in the distant room of this big house about which wood-grouses in the houses tell.

Bush’s contempt for leftists far exceeds his dubious desire to rid the world of terrorism. That’s why the country’s energies are so misdirected and doomed to failure.

Sure, his cohorts, the uber-nationalists, eat-it-up. That’s why the right-wing blogs are all atwitter with the news of Bush’s “Big Catch” in the GWOT. According to the loonies on the right, “Terrorist Kingpin” Stewart is guilty of everything except steering the planes into the buildings.


Bilious Bill O’ Reilly and his ilk will probably follow up with their typical scathing attack on civil liberties organizations, those pedophile-defending Stalinist pornographers. If we took O’Reilly’s advice we’d empty Guantanamo right now to make room for any card-carrying member of the ACLU. The only way to keep America free is by eliminating the people who defend freedom.

How logical is that?

Imagine if we really took terrorism seriously? What if we withdrew the troops from Iraq and Afghanistan, shut down Bush’s gulag in Guantanamo, stopped killing Arabs in their own countries, and recognized that “Islamo-fascism” is a clever public-relations buzzword intended to incite hatred of Muslims?

How long would it be before the “global threat of terrorism” would shrivel and die on the vine?

Three weeks ago, the National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) was leaked to the New York Times. The report laid out the findings of the 16 American intelligence agencies, which “unanimously” agreed that Iraq was producing a new generation of terrorists and making the American people “less safe”.

What a surprise.

Lynne Stewart’s name was not in the report, but George Bush’s featured rather prominently. Bush has incited more terrorism than any person in the grim history of the planet, and now, the 16 preeminent intel-agencies have confirmed that very point.

If we’re serious about terrorism, we have to do something about the people who are creating it; Bush and Cheney. 5 years after 9-11, it’s not enough to say “At least we got Martha Stewart and her 67-year old namesake off the streets.”

More from this author:
The Breaking Point (10913 Hits)
It was another bad week in Iraq. While bodies were piling up in the Baghdad morgue and the militia fighting steadily intensified, the Bush...
Barking Mad (20191 Hits)
It’s not a comforting thought, but it’s the truth. As the situation in Iraq continues to deteriorate and the feckless congress concedes more...
More “Culture Wars” Gibberish from nutcase David Brooks (16354 Hits)
Most of us know David Brooks as the balding goofball on “The Jim Lehrer News Hour” who shrugs his shoulders and giggles gleefully whenever...
Why does Thailand have all the Luck? (11757 Hits)
About 2 weeks ago, 10 Soviet-era tanks clanked-along the main thoroughfare in downtown Bangkok and stopped in front of the Presidential Palace. Once...
The Mushroom Cloud over the U.N. (10170 Hits)
  The Bush administration has repeatedly rejected North Korea’s appeals for a “non-aggression” pact. Bush believes that he has the...
Related Articles:
Why Bush Smiles: Victory is at Hand in Iraq (15119 Hits)
Despite George W. Bush's ostentatious bucking up of the Iraqi government yesterday, it is very likely that there will indeed be an...
Giving Thanks in the Shadow of the Terror War (8897 Hits)
The "War on Terror" represents a horribly, monstrously wrong turn for the United States, Britain, and the world. Like its offshoot, the...
Foiled German Terror Plot Was A Joke? (7939 Hits)
by Winter Patriot According to the BBC, the NYT, CNN, and many other sources, German officials announced on Monday that they had foiled a...
Lynching Saddam - Part 10: Virtue, Terror and the Western public opinion’ s bloodthirsty schizophrenia (10228 Hits)
by Gabriele Zamparini,   The notorious Kafka-esque trial is over; the Baghdad’s bordello turned its red lights off. Iraq President...
Keith Olbermann’s Latest Prophetic Denunciation of this President (Plus a Bit of Commentary) (7107 Hits)
by Andrew Bard Schmookler I heard this last night on COUNTDOWN. Now I see that it is on truthout (and other sites). Olbermann’s boldness...

Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Comments (1)add comment

Jimmy Montague said:

It's mostly true, but. . . .
The terror won't stop if we quit hunting terrorists. The terror will go on as long as we hold Israel uber alles in the Middle East, as long as we install and prop up hateful dictators like Saddam and the Shah of Iran, and the rest, as long as we choose to meddle in the affairs of oil-rich states to sustain our gluttonous oil consumption. Other changes will have to be made, as well.

So there's a lot more for a Democrat Congress to take on than they'll be able to handle in the short run -- even if they're inclined to do so, which they're not. I read the news every day and so far I haven't seen a single story in which Democrats promise us anything except "we're not George Bush."

It will be a fine thing when the campaign of 2006 is over, when Nancy Pelosi and her crew are finally called upon to shit or get off the pot. I predict she'll stand up, pull up her knickers, and walk directly to the bank -- laughing all the way.

And no. I don't vote Republican. I would vote Democrat if they gave me a reason. But they don't
October 18, 2006 | url
Votes: +0

Write comment
smaller | bigger



Top 123