Home     Writers     Op/Ed     Book Reviews     News     Bookstore     Photoshops     Submit     Search     Contact Us     Advertise  
  You are here: 





“Every Honest Politician” Sebastian Mallaby’s Distortions
Friday, 27 October 2006 13:31

by Seth Sandronsky,

As U.S. midterm elections near, the topic of political honesty draws some pundits like moths to light.  Take Sebastian Mallaby in the Washington Post of October 23.

“Every honest politician knows that entitlement spending on retirees is going to bust the budget,” Mallaby writes.  “But since the failure of Bush's proposed Social Security overhaul last year, nobody is doing anything about it.”

Presumably, these honest politicians are aghast at rising costs for Medicare, which provides health care to Americans age 65 and up, plus some disabled recipients of Social Security.  We turn to the Medicare prescription drug benefit bill, known as Medicare Part D.

Known and very popular cialis coupon which gives all the chance to receive a discount for a preparation which has to be available and exactly cialis coupons has been found in the distant room of this big house about which wood-grouses in the houses tell.

The GOP Congress claimed that this bill would foster competition.  But first,  the heavy hand of government had to go.  This would help to free competition.
As competitive pressures rose, private drug prices would fall, the GOP promised.  Americans covered by Medicare would benefit from lower costs.

Instead, Medicare Part D has mainly helped insurance and pharmaceutical companies.  What happened to the promised price competition?  In brief, the prescription drug benefit bill banned Medicare from negotiating lower drug prices with insurers and pharmaceutical companies.

By contrast, the U.S. Veterans Administration and nations such as Australia and Canada use their bargaining power to negotiate prices for many drugs with private companies.  With such negotiations, the VA and these countries get lower drug prices.

Under the GOP-backed Medicare Part D, the insurance and pharmaceutical companies successfully lobbied the U.S. Congress to kill competition.  The corporations in these industries got what they wanted—monopoly profits.

Predictably, that monopolization of prescription medications drove up the costs for millions of people covered by Medicare.

Companies such as Merck (Zocor/cholesterol), Pfizer (Lipitor/cholesterol and Zoloft/anxiety) and Wyeth (Protonix/heartburn) reaped billions of dollars in windfall profits, according to economist Dean Baker, co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research in Washington, DC.  “The excess profits for the drug industry as a whole will be close to $50 billion in the first full year of the Medicare drug benefit program,” he added.

The lesson in this Medicare drug bill is clear.  Industry monopolies drive medicine prices up, not down.  Senior and disabled Americans can thank the GOP Congress for that.

No wonder the cost of the U.S. health care system is outstripping the rate of inflation.  Meanwhile, scriveners such as Mallaby pontificate about politicians needing to cut entitlement spending, a so-called ticking time bomb in the federal budget.  For him, slowing the out-of-control price increases of U.S. health care is not an issue.
And why is there a need to overhaul Social Security?  The 2006 Social Security trustees’ report, the standard basis for Social Security projections, says Social Security will be able to pay 100 percent of its scheduled benefits through 2046 with no changes needed, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.

Recall that President George W. Bush tried with little success to convince the U.S. public that Social Security will face a future cash crisis that requires reform now.  Dramatically, he failed to persuade the American people that a way to save Social Security was by creating private accounts for younger workers to own.
Under the president’s plan for Social Security, young wage-earners would have a chance to join his “ownership society.”  And the same private accounts for Social Security would generate big fees for the financial services industry, a large source of campaign funds for the GOP.  “Every honest politician” should know that.



More from this author:
Is Another Recession Looming? Growth Slows, Housing Fizzles (7580 Hits)
By Seth Sandronsky   U.S. economic growth rose at an annual rate of 1.6 percent in July–September, the slowest in more than three...
University Unity - California professors and students join forces (5346 Hits)
by Seth Sandronsky The recent election win of an incumbent and centrist GOP governor in California over his Democratic rival by double digits...
The Washington Post's War Against Social Security - Editorializing while reporting (10710 Hits)
By Seth Sandronsky Lori Montgomery of the Washington Post reporter has a problem with Social Security.  She writes: "the...
To Rent or Own in the US? (4081 Hits)
by Seth Sandronsky Are you a renter now in the US? If so, perhaps thoughts of ditching that arrangement with a landlord and buying a home are...
Related Articles:
Honest Centrism for Populist Democracy (11411 Hits)
by Joel S. Hirschhorn The United States has lost its center through destructive centrifugal politics. America seems spinning out of control....
What If the FBI Hired Someone Honest to Look Into 9—11? (7130 Hits)
by David Swanson It did. Her name was Sibel Edmonds. This is her story, as she told it to me. Edmonds discusses what she knows, whom it ...
Channel 4's Climate Swindle - The Distortions Continue (10179 Hits)
by David Edwards and David Cromwell On March 13, we published a Media Alert analysing some of the gross flaws and distortions in The Great...
Distortions of Acumen The Liberal Trashing of Prof. Ward Churchill (5027 Hits)
by Joshua Frank The shameless trashing of Ward Churchill from the left side of our political setting was perhaps the most grotesque of all...
First Woman, First Black, First Latino, or First Honest President? (3442 Hits)
by Joel S. Hirschhorn The phrase honest politician has become an oxymoron. We should not be impressed by the prospect of having the first...

Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Comments (3)add comment

enemy of the people said:

The fight to "fix" Social Security and other nonsense
Clearly, the GOP is only concerned with fulfilling campaign promises they made to their corporate masters. Promises to their "base" on the wedge issues? No way.
The drumbeat of reform will continue apace no matter who takes power next month. The dems will be "nicer" about it but reform they will. Those corporate masters will get their pound of flesh. And middle America will provide it.
October 28, 2006
Votes: +0

Jimmy Montague said:

a different drum
Enemy of the people is right. The Democrats will slow things down but they won't actually move to stop it. The drumbeat of rape and pillage (NOT reform) will go right on pounding. Democrats have been coy this year. They're going to get themselves elected without having to promise us a thing. See what happens once they're in.
October 28, 2006 | url
Votes: +0

Blaqfather said:

Well, I would hope that someone, a Democrat or a Republican, will start to put global warming on their agenda. The hole in the ozone layer grew by 2 million miles last year, outstretching scientific estimates. It is now larger than North America. I would assume, but I may be wrong, that the Democrats are more likely to at least do something to reduce green house gases through the development of alternative energies and reduced emission standards. The environment will not last forever. We can already see the results of years of abusive policies, mostly attached to Republican agendas, take their toll on fragile ecosystems. One republican friend of mine, said that the environment was a "non-issue."
October 28, 2006 | url
Votes: +0

Write comment
smaller | bigger



Top 123