Home     Writers     Op/Ed     Book Reviews     News     Bookstore     Photoshops     Submit     Search     Contact Us     Advertise  
  You are here: 

Mon

18

May

2009

Constitutional Rubbish
Monday, 18 May 2009 21:16
by Joel S. Hirschhorn

Americans need a civics lesson. And so do politicians. Of all the wrong and delusional thinking about the US Constitution the one that is most thoroughly incorrect and routinely used for political propaganda purposes is that there are three coequal branches of the federal government.

You hear presidents, members of Congress and media pundits say it all the time. They are wrong. Nowhere in the Constitution or the Federalist Papers is there any statement or declaration that the three branches are coequal. Why has this myth persisted for so long? Why do so many prominent and supposedly educated people keep invoking this outright lie?

Make no mistake. Either in theory or practice is there any basis whatsoever for believing that the legislative, executive and judicial branches of the federal government are coequal. It also defies common sense.

Historical analysis has always shown that the Founders, if anything, intended for Congress to be preeminent, and not the President and the executive branch. For example, only Congress has the constitutional power to remove the President and other high officers of the executive branch as well as the judiciary, but the latter cannot remove any member of Congress. And Congress has control of raising and spending government funds as well as the power to overrule any presidential attempt to veto legislation. That Congress does not always choose to fully exercise its constitutional powers does not remove them.

As to the Supreme Court and the whole judiciary, they function only as long as Congress provides funds, the executive branch provides security, and both choose to obey court decisions. More importantly, the Supreme Court does not act on its own to enforce the Constitution, even when the President and Congress disobey it, but it could.

It is time for Americans to stop and think. In what exact ways are the three branches coequal? According to the dictionary coequal means resembling each other in all respects. But ridding the culture of constitutional myths seems awfully difficult, especially since Garry Wills published his excellent book “A Necessary Evil” a decade ago, which artfully exposed a number of them.


In particular, presidents seem to like talking about the coequal branches of government, including Barack Obama. In January 2008 Obama said this in a speech: “No law can give Congress a backbone if it refuses to stand up as the co-equal branch the Constitution made it.” Do presidents really want coequal branches? I think not. But they want Americans to keep believing in coequality, because it sounds good and adds an aura of respect for government that politicians desperately want.

In reality, presidents with the most political power want others with far less power to feel good. They want to keep the public believing (incorrectly) that the president is very limited in power. If George W. Bush proved anything it was not just that he created the imperial presidency, but that over time the presidency has become a mostly unchecked, pre-eminent and over-powerful government force. They have accumulated far more powers than ever envisioned by the Constitution. By regularly invoking the false coequality of branches argument and its derivative checks and balances thesis, presidents intentionally spread the propaganda to safeguard an all-powerful presidency and executive branch.

Meanwhile, Americans are largely ignorant that Congress has refused to honor and obey an important constitutional option in Article V: a convention of state delegates that could propose constitutional amendments, despite over 750 applications from all 50 states for a convention. It is their way of preserving exclusivity for proposing amendments and presidents say nothing because they fear amendments curbing their power. The Supreme Court does nothing because it likes amending the Constitution through its decisions.

Understand this: Having distinct constitutional responsibilities does not make branches coequal. The myth of coequality protects our delusional democracy and makes a mockery of our constitutional republic. If people really want coequal branches then they should start thinking about a constitutional amendment to make it so. Alternatively, we need Congress and the judiciary to act with far greater strength and conviction to use their constitutional powers and more effectively constrain presidential powers.

If prominent people tell a lie enough times, again, and again, and again, then the public lie becomes accepted fact, a cultural myth. So it is with the three coequal branches of government lie. It will be defended. It serves a purpose: False confidence in constitutional government.

[Contact Joel S. Hirschhorn through delusionaldemocracy.com.]
More from this author:
Field of Screams - The Real Election Winners and Losers (8206 Hits)
by Joel S. Hirschhorn Forget political correctness. The revolution has NOT arrived! Bush is still president. The...
Direct Democracy Lost in Florida and Colorado (8160 Hits)
by Joel S. Hirschhorn With all the hoopla about the big Democratic win, little attention has been given to the assault on direct democracy....
Third Parties Fight for American Democracy (8337 Hits)
by Joel S. Hirschhorn A great democracy offers citizens sharp political choices. That’s what gives political freedom meaning. With ...
Honest Centrism for Populist Democracy (9102 Hits)
by Joel S. Hirschhorn The United States has lost its center through destructive centrifugal politics. America seems spinning out of control....
Economic Apartheid Kills (8287 Hits)
by Joel S. Hirschhorn To be successful in overturning our elitist plutocratic system we should add economic apartheid to our...
Related Articles:
Let It Come Down: Forcing the Constitutional Crisis of Liberty (7776 Hits)
Nat Hentoff, one of our great champions of civil liberties, uncovers the ugly truths behind the Bush Regime's plans for a Nuremberg-in-reverse at the...
Bush Dodges a Constitutional Bullet in New Mexico (4986 Hits)
by Dave Lindorff President Bush dodged a Constitutional bullet in New Mexico Thursday, when nine Democrats in the state senate joined all...
Conyers is my Constitutional Hero (4589 Hits)
by Dave Lindorff When it comes to defending the Constitution from the saboteurs of freedom and democracy in the Bush administration, my ...
America and Venezuela: Constitutional Worlds Apart (5234 Hits)
by Stephen Lendman Although imperfect, no country anywhere is closer to a model democracy than Venezuela under President Hugo Rafael Chavez...
Lobby Electeds in Constitutional Interventions (3358 Hits)
by Linda Milazzo During previous American presidencies, less calamitous than that of George W. Bush, the most consistent visitors to local...


Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Trackback(0)
Comments (0)add comment

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 

adsense

Top