Home     Writers     Op/Ed     Book Reviews     News     Bookstore     Photoshops     Submit     Search     Contact Us     Advertise  
  You are here: 

Thu

23

Apr

2009

Aggressive behaviour by any other name
Thursday, 23 April 2009 20:02
by Dr. J. Paul Balles

Suppose you and I are walking along the street in opposite directions. Now, suppose I don't like your looks. You look threatening.

I can do several things: look away, go on about my walk and try to forget your threatening look, or I can return your threatening look and perhaps provoke you to challenge me.

On the other hand, I can assume, rightly or wrongly, that you are actually a threat to me. Assuming I'm strong enough, I might then hit you in order to disable the threat.

This, in short, is the theory and act of preemption, a theory and action that has been the basis of much foreign policy of both America and Israel.

In America, the application of the theory became the "Bush Doctrine". However, it didn't originate with George W. Bush but with Zionists like Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz and others in the Bush administration.

The act of striking preemptively is not new. The Soviet Union attacked Finland in 1941 after the Germans attacked Russia. The Japanese attacked Pearl Harbour to preempt America from controlling the South Pacific.

When the US invaded Iraq, the historian Arthur Schlesinger wrote that Bush's grand strategy was "alarmingly similar to the policy that imperial Japan employed at the time of Pearl Harbour.”

By definition, a preemptive strike commonly refers to an attack made upon an enemy as a precautionary response to an anticipated or impending war, such as in a preemptive war.


The Israeli Defence Forces launched a preemptive attack on Arab forces in the 1967 Six Day War. They also preemptively bombed a suspected nuclear plant in Iraq in 1981 and another in Syria last year. They have preemptively struck Lebanon and Gaza.

Israel goaded America into a preemptive war in Iraq, and they have urged another preemptive war with Iran. The entire philosophy of dealing with unfriendly nations is “strike first and destroy any potential enemy or threat.”

Regardless of the arguments made for invading Iraq, Article 51 of the UN Charter makes it clear that self-defence is restricted to a response to an armed attack.” Article 2, Section 4 of the U.N. Charter bars the threat or use of force against any state in the absence of an acute and imminent actual threat.”

Iraq, which had been under sanctions for ten years, certainly could not have been considered an acute and imminent threat. Nor could Hamas in Gaza or Hezbollah in Lebanon to the Israelis. Iran, not having attacked anyone for 200 years, certainly does not qualify as an acute and imminent threat.

Noam Chomsky made a distinction between preemptive war and preventive war, though both are excuses for unwarranted aggression.

Whatever the justifications for preemptive war might be, they do not hold for preventive war, particularly as that concept is interpreted by its current enthusiasts: the use of military force to eliminate an invented or imagined threat, so that even the term "preventive" is too charitable. Preventive war is, very simply, the supreme crime that was condemned at Nuremberg.

The "potential enemy" may not be any more threat than I saw in your threatening look as we walked along the same street. However, that doesn't matter if I am searching for threatening looks.

In another article, I referred to this Israeli sickness as paranoia. George W. Bush was infected with the same disease, which resulted in unnecessary and unjustified wars.

It's time to admit that the Bush Doctrine was a grave, inhuman wrong. Barack Obama should strongly repudiate it and urge the US Congress to pass legislation that permits war only as a legitimate act of defence.
More from this author:
Perfidy, Duplicity and Deceit (7149 Hits)
By Dr. Paul J. Balles If the world will be gulled, let it be gulled. -Robert Burton Americans refuse to end the reign of the National...
Invisible Men (6534 Hits)
by Dr. Paul J. Balles “I am an invisible man," said Ralph Ellison in the prologue to his novel The Invisible Man, "When...
Freedom Loved and Hated (8201 Hits)
by Paul Balles Our liberty depends on the freedom of the press, and that cannot be limited without being lost. --Thomas Jefferson ...
Nothing to celebrate - US elections bad for Arabs (7323 Hits)
by Paul J. Balles Paul J. Balles argues that the Democrats' gains in the US mid-term elections will not lead to a change in US policy in the...
A world of psychopaths - The superiority complex of psychopaths - and Israel and the US (11414 Hits)
by Paul J. Balles Paul J. Balles considers the psychopathic phenomenon of the "superiority complex" as an explanation of...
Related Articles:
A Trial Giving Kangaroos A Bad Name (9456 Hits)
by Stephen Lendman As the dominant corporate media in the US made sure everyone in the country would know just ahead of the mid-term...
Determined to Discriminate in the Name of “God” (10421 Hits)
By Mel Seesholtz, Ph.D. “Welcome to Americans for Truth, the only national organization devoted exclusively to exposing and countering the...
Slum Planet, Schrödinger's 'You,' and Other Underreported Stories of 2006 (4467 Hits)
by R.J. Eskow What can you say about a year when the Vice President shoots somebody in the face, hides from the authorities, then gives a...
Fashion nonsense and other foibles of the cognoscenti (5174 Hits)
by Frank Pitz Just when you think it can't get any sillier, any more mundane, along comes a news (sic) that restores your faith in the bizarre....
Meatwad the Bomb Among Other Absurdities (4797 Hits)
by Aaron B. Pryor This rant is for Molly Ivins, one on my short list of people I always wanted to be like when I grew up. Hell, I still do....


Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Trackback(0)
Comments (2)add comment

Blue Pilgrim said:

0
The underlying motives
That explanation might do if it were really the case that one felt threatened, but in the two cases mentioned that was not the case. Rather it is as if I decided to mug you and steal your money, and tried to justify that by saying I thought you would attack me. Those in control of the US government had already, no later than 1996, decided it want to attack Iraq and contorl hte area and the oil. Israel had long ago decided it wanted all the Palestinians land, and would rid it of the Palestinians living there. These were and are not preemptive wars nor preventative wars, but wars of aggression. These wars were highway robbery.
 
April 25, 2009
Votes: +0

wow gold said:

0
adasd
Feeling very well written
 
May 27, 2009 | url
Votes: +0

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 

adsense

Top