Suppose you and I are walking along the street in opposite directions. Now, suppose I don't like your looks. You look threatening.
I can do several things: look away, go on about my walk and try to forget your threatening look, or I can return your threatening look and perhaps provoke you to challenge me.
On the other hand, I can assume, rightly or wrongly, that you are actually a threat to me. Assuming I'm strong enough, I might then hit you in order to disable the threat.
This, in short, is the theory and act of preemption, a theory and action that has been the basis of much foreign policy of both America and Israel.
In America, the application of the theory became the "Bush Doctrine". However, it didn't originate with George W. Bush but with Zionists like Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz and others in the Bush administration.
The act of striking preemptively is not new. The Soviet Union attacked Finland in 1941 after the Germans attacked Russia. The Japanese attacked Pearl Harbour to preempt America from controlling the South Pacific.
When the US invaded Iraq, the historian Arthur Schlesinger wrote that Bush's grand strategy was "alarmingly similar to the policy that imperial Japan employed at the time of Pearl Harbour.”
By definition, a preemptive strike commonly refers to an attack made upon an enemy as a precautionary response to an anticipated or impending war, such as in a preemptive war.
Known and very popular cialis coupon which gives all the chance to receive a discount for a preparation which has to be available and exactly cialis coupons has been found in the distant room of this big house about which wood-grouses in the houses tell.
The Israeli Defence Forces launched a preemptive attack on Arab forces in the 1967 Six Day War. They also preemptively bombed a suspected nuclear plant in Iraq in 1981 and another in Syria last year. They have preemptively struck Lebanon and Gaza.
Israel goaded America into a preemptive war in Iraq, and they have urged another preemptive war with Iran. The entire philosophy of dealing with unfriendly nations is “strike first and destroy any potential enemy or threat.”
Regardless of the arguments made for invading Iraq, Article 51 of the UN Charter makes it clear that self-defence is restricted to a response to an armed attack.” Article 2, Section 4 of the U.N. Charter bars the threat or use of force against any state in the absence of an acute and imminent actual threat.”
Iraq, which had been under sanctions for ten years, certainly could not have been considered an acute and imminent threat. Nor could Hamas in Gaza or Hezbollah in Lebanon to the Israelis. Iran, not having attacked anyone for 200 years, certainly does not qualify as an acute and imminent threat.
Noam Chomsky made a distinction between preemptive war and preventive war, though both are excuses for unwarranted aggression.
Whatever the justifications for preemptive war might be, they do not hold for preventive war, particularly as that concept is interpreted by its current enthusiasts: the use of military force to eliminate an invented or imagined threat, so that even the term "preventive" is too charitable. Preventive war is, very simply, the supreme crime that was condemned at Nuremberg.
The "potential enemy" may not be any more threat than I saw in your threatening look as we walked along the same street. However, that doesn't matter if I am searching for threatening looks.
In another article, I referred to this Israeli sickness as paranoia. George W. Bush was infected with the same disease, which resulted in unnecessary and unjustified wars.
It's time to admit that the Bush Doctrine was a grave, inhuman wrong. Barack Obama should strongly repudiate it and urge the US Congress to pass legislation that permits war only as a legitimate act of defence.
By Dr. Paul J. Balles If the world will be gulled, let it be gulled. -Robert Burton Americans refuse to end the reign of the National...
by Dr. Paul J. Balles “I am an invisible man," said Ralph Ellison in the prologue to his novel The Invisible Man, "When...
by Paul Balles Our liberty depends on the freedom of the press, and that cannot be limited without being lost. --Thomas Jefferson ...
by Paul J. Balles Paul J. Balles argues that the Democrats' gains in the US mid-term elections will not lead to a change in US policy in the...
by Paul J. Balles Paul J. Balles considers the psychopathic phenomenon of the "superiority complex" as an explanation of...
Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites