Home     Writers     Op/Ed     Book Reviews     News     Bookstore     Photoshops     Submit     Search     Contact Us     Advertise  
  You are here: 

Wed

03

Jan

2007

The problem with solutions
Wednesday, 03 January 2007 04:00
by Robert Jensen
[Remarks to the second “Last Sunday” community gathering in Austin, TX, December 29, 2006. http://thirdcoastactivist.org/lastsunday.html]
 


I’ve been assigned to talk about solutions to the pressing problems we face, but I’ve never been very good at following orders. So, instead I’m going to talk about the problem with solutions.
 
The assignment came from our first “Last Sunday” event in November, which we hoped would bring together the secular and spiritual, the political and the social. The standing-room-only audience generated a lot of positive energy that night, but that doesn’t mean the event — or the ideas animating it — were immune from criticism. And, this being Austin, we heard from lots of folks about what they thought those shortcomings were.
 
Two consistent themes emerged from the feedback, captured in this suggestion card:
 
“Don’t spend so much of our precious time telling us about the problems. We already know (most of) the problems. Instead, spend more time telling us about solutions that we, as individuals, and as a group, can do. We are looking for HOPE. Show us how we can be part of the solution.”
 
“We already know the problems — tell us about solutions.”
 
Over and over I’ve heard that, not just after Last Sunday, but ever since I started doing political organizing. While I understand the sentiment, I want to suggest that the first claim is inaccurate, and the second request is dangerous.


First, we — not just the so-called “masses” out there, but we in here — have not yet fully grasped the nature of the problems we face. Second, as we are struggling to come to terms with the depth of those problems, we have yet to face the fact that there are no solutions. In other words: (1) None of us is as smart as we would like to think, and (2) as we start to recognize our own collective ignorance, we will have to face not just what we can do but what we can’t.
 
Perhaps paradoxically, that is where I find hope — in facing honestly the condition of the world that we have desecrated and the limits of human intelligence to reconsecrate that world. It is only from those realizations, I believe, that meaningful action is possible.
 
When I say we don’t know the problems, I don’t mean we aren’t aware of what is plainly in front of us: Disastrously destructive wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, a house-of-cards economy, enduring racism and sexism, cascading ecological crises, and a corrosive culture that values profit over people. But how deep does our analysis go? How well do we really understand the inherent pathology of capitalism and patriotism? How many of us have dared to stare down the ugliness and raw brutality at the core of white supremacy and patriarchy?
 
And have we honestly assessed the tension between those aspects of our human nature (our capacity for greed and violence) that created those problems and those aspects (our capacity for solidarity and love) that make transcending these problems possible? As the song goes, “all you need is love,” but the problem is we also have a lot more than love swirling around in each of us.
 
We have to face the fact that we are a species that has, in the words of Wes Jackson, gotten very good at exploiting the energy-rich carbon in this world’s soils, forests, and fossil fuels to enrich ourselves at the expense of others. That’s part of human nature. Now we have to do what no other species has had to do — self-consciously practice restraint at what we do best in such bad ways. That is no small task, but our ability to name that task and imagine accomplishing it also is part of human nature.
 
If we all really understood the problems in this sense, we might not be so quick to demand solutions — if by that term we mean clear public-policy choices that can be implemented in the relatively short term. Such a yearning for short-term solutions is, I believe, the best indication that one hasn’t come to terms with the depth of the problems.
 
Take the problem of oil — both that we are running out and that burning what’s left will accelerate rapid climate change. A demand for solutions can lead to the corporate boondoggle of corn-based ethanol or the hazy illusions around biodiesel, instead of helping us face a more troubling reality: There is no viable alternative to petroleum for a car-based transportation system that it is fundamentally unsustainable. What are the possible “solutions” to that “problem,” which we all allegedly know about, other than to radically curtail the way we move ourselves about?
 
This doesn’t mean there’s nothing we can do. It doesn’t mean there aren’t things we should do. There are actions we can take, and we have to work hard to make sure we take the best possible actions to try to reverse the direction of a world headed for the cliff. In the realm of portable liquid fuels, economically and ecologically it’s clear that corn-based ethanol is a loser that should be abandoned, while biodiesel has limited possibilities that should be pursued, but realistically. But as we pursue those “solutions,” we also have to face a fact: There are no solutions that will allow us to continue to live this way. There is only the struggle to find something new, with no guarantees we will find our way.
 
Why press such a seemingly dour scenario? Because anything else is illusion, and illusions can never carry us home. Illusions inevitably fall away, leaving people feeling abandoned, depressed, and hopeless. Illusions are not practical.
 
Ruthlessly rejecting illusions is not the same as giving up hope. But we have to be clear that hope isn’t something to be found out in the world; it’s a feature of our humanity that each of us has to either claim or abandon. It’s a state of being, not a function of the state of the world.
 
When I make this argument, I am often told that illusions are necessary, that people can’t handle this level of honesty. I take that to mean that the person making this judgment about other people’s limitations actually is really saying “I need my illusions because I can’t handle this level of honesty.” I say that with no arrogance, knowing how I struggle to handle it.
 
The only way I can keep up that struggle is collectively, in community, through conversation. That’s what Last Sunday is about. We did not create this space to pretend that those of us on stage know all the right questions, let alone the answers. We have no solutions to offer. Instead, we offer an invitation and an invocation, a place and a space — and, okay, yes, we offer our sense of hope, of what can come from coming together.
 
But that hope must begin with honesty. Here’s my honest statement:
 
I stand before you in a profound state of grief for the state of the world. For me, Last Sunday is about creating a place to feel that, honestly. Last month, Jim Rigby quoted the anarchist Emma Goldman on the subject of joy in politics, reminding us that we should reject any revolution in which we can’t dance. 
 
But just as important, I won’t be part of any revolution in which I can’t cry. I think we have to recognize this grief. We have to demand that the revolution be one in which we not only can dance, but cry as well.
 
One of my favorite writers, Wendell Berry, talks of coming to terms with “the human estate of grief and joy.” What an apt way to describe the essence of what it means to be human. When we face honestly our place in the world, we recognize the need to cry and to dance. We recognize that each requires the other.
 
Last Sunday, whatever else it may be, is the attempt to name that estate honestly, to claim that estate responsibly, to remind ourselves of how much work we have to do if we are to live there with hope.
 
 
Robert Jensen is a journalism professor at the University of Texas at Austin and a board member of the Third Coast Activist Resource Center, http://thirdcoastactivist.org/. He is the author of The Heart of Whiteness: Race, Racism, and White Privilege and Citizens of the Empire: The Struggle to Claim Our Humanity (City Lights Books). He can be reached at rjensen@uts.cc.utexas.edu .
More from this author:
Opportunities lost: When bullies derail dialogue, we all lose (9159 Hits)
by Robert Jensen In a world of spin, no one expects truth from corporate executives or the politicians who serve them, but many of us...
Last Sunday: Digging in and digging deep (7543 Hits)
by Robert Jensen [Remarks to the first in a series of “Last Sunday” community gatherings in Austin, TX, November 26, 2006.] ...
Saying goodbye to my “Fargo” accent (16372 Hits)
by Robert Jensen Ever since the movie “Fargo” came out a decade ago, my ability to mimic the Scandinavian-inflected accent of my hometown...
Media reform should include critique of sexual-exploitation media (11158 Hits)
by Robert Jensen At a progressive media reform conference dedicated to resisting corporate control of mass media, where many of the...
What to do with/about white folks? (8591 Hits)
by Robert Jensen After the initial “Last Sunday” gathering in November, many people made the observation that it was a mostly white...
Related Articles:
Nukes: Iran and North Korea are not the problem (14058 Hits)
by Mickey Z. Thanks to the nuclear aspirations of North Korea and Iran, there's no shortage of rhetoric along these lines: "We can't let...
Catapulting the Propaganda with the Washington Post (12288 Hits)
by Chris Floyd The ever persipacious Angry Arab, As'ad AbuKhalil, plucks out the hidden (or not-so-hidden) propaganda in a passing...
Rough Justice; prowling Baghdad with a sidearm and a defective bulletproof-vest (9322 Hits)
by Mike Whitney On Monday, an editorial is scheduled to appear in the “Army Times” which will call for Donald Rumsfeld’s resignation as...
Paper Trail:Turning the Corner With a Timely Verdict (10193 Hits)
by Chris Floyd Well, Karl Rove got the banner headline he wanted for all the final Sunday papers before the ele ction: Saddam Hussein Is...
To Hell with Centrism: We Must Reclaim the Inspired Edge (7590 Hits)
by Phil Rockstroh "During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act". -George...


Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Trackback(0)
Comments (5)add comment

Brad Arnold said:

0
No, you don't know how bad the problem is, so you choose the wrong solution
If you knew how bad the problem of global warming is, you would be open for solutions. Instead, the unrealistic prescription is for mankind to stifle their greenhouse gas emission. Wrong: mankind is set to DOUBLE their emissions, not drmatically cut them quickly. Besides, as the earth warms, it will start emitting far more greenhouse gas than humans (this is called "runaway global warming").

Instead, the only solution is to remove the CO2 from the air after it has been emitted. Nature already absorbs about half of mankind's emissions, but by 2030 that will be reduced by 30%. By mid-century earth will probably be carbon neutral, and then start emitting greenhouse big time.

I suggest using genetic engineer to improve nature so she can absorb more CO2. Perhaps seeding a GMO into the ocean. The alternative has happened many times in the past: runaway global warming and mass extinction. You are going to be surprised how quickly this will occur.
 
January 03, 2007
Votes: +0

Jean-David Beyer said:

0
...
"I suggest using genetic engineer to improve nature so she can absorb more CO2. Perhaps seeding a GMO into the ocean. The alternative has happened many times in the past: runaway global warming and mass extinction. You are going to be surprised how quickly this will occur."

How about a genetic engineer to improve human nature so we produce less CO2? In most contamination issues (air pollution, electromagnetic noise pollution, etc.) controlling the problem AT THE SOURCE is the most cost-effective (and sometimes the only practical method) to control the contamination.
 
January 03, 2007
Votes: +0

blue said:

0
A Possible Solution
A rather feeble effort.
How about the problem of the lack of democracy in the US. Pelosi and Democrats have refused to bring about impeachment hearings, they refuse to cut and run from Iraq. Indeed, on the latter point, the majority of Americans want the troops out. Instead, Pelosi hopes to add to the half a million plus dead in Iraq to salvage our imperialist designs on that area.

So, what is the solution?

Well, there is the old standby: March on Washington January 27 http://www.unitedforpeace.org/

Of course, demonstrations have failed in the past, largely because they have been too polite. So maybe we need to add a bit of CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE. A little occupation, a little resistance. Maybe even a color scheme as the US has promoted so well in Eastern Europe. Might I suggest scarves in red white and blue, waved around in the air. The irony at least might send a message. Maybe even NED would fund the purchase of scarves.

Do you think Morales would be in power without the civil disobedience of the Bolivian people, or that Chavez would have survived the 2002 coup without the civil disobedience of the Venezuelans.

The Beast has to stop being a nice guy, and show its fangs a bit.

That's one possible solution
 
January 03, 2007
Votes: +0

Rod Amis said:

Rod Amis
The Problem of Complexity
Bob,

I appreciated reading this thoughtful post. I trust that you'll maintain the ability to both cry and dance while seeking progress. That you can keep humor while addressing social issues in a world groan boringly doctinaire is appreciated.

Dancing into 2007,
RA
 
January 04, 2007 | url
Votes: +0

art j. said:

0
Yes.
When you mentioned Wes Jackson (Land Institute) I thought you'd include a thought or two inspired from Wendell Berry. Once Kentucky'ian Mr Berry captures our attention...We (read: The Way of Ignorance--And other essays by W.B.) are more easily able to Admit we have many, irresponsible, false prophets telling us the future will be just dandy.

'Oh-Put our diamond sole-studded shoes up on the desk, fold our hands behind our head, and wait awhile."

I spent a rare three days with W.B. in the 80's after he wrote the book about artist: wood-block sketches, paints, beekeeper, fisherman, gardner writer 'tug-boat' river enthusiast etc. Harlan Hubbard is a wonderful read about joy of frugal life. Living differently than the hectic masses. It's a kind critique of what we value. It's good to know 'there' out there influencing...You'll find them out on a playground planting white dutch clover during a war. You'll not find 'um in the barroom too often, but if so, they are jolly and not smack-up side the head with a poolstick for admiring their women. I remember Thomas Merton mentioned in a diary Wendell's wife Tanya was attractive. Hope this is not OT? We do need to belly laugh and remain land-grounded because the problems are great. What's the password?
 
January 04, 2007 | url
Votes: +0

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 

adsense

Top