Home     Writers     Op/Ed     Book Reviews     News     Bookstore     Photoshops     Submit     Search     Contact Us     Advertise  
  You are here: 





Robert Mugabe, yet another man the West loves to hate
Wednesday, 09 July 2008 02:20
by William Bowles

Robert Mugabe is bit like Osama bin Laden, if he didn’t exist they’d have to invent him, and invent him they have, with a vengeance.

Now I’m not a supporter of Zanu-PF, for me their politics have always been suspect. Back during the Apartheid years, Zanu-PF never acknowledged the ANC as the leader of the liberation struggle in South Africa, preferring instead to support the PAC (the Pan Africanist Congress). Well you win some, you lose some.

Zanu-PF has oscillated wildly in its choice of political position, veering from the quasi-Trotskyist to the Maoist and ending up as Mugabeism. Since gaining independence in 1980, Zanu-PF have had well over twenty years to do something about real land re-distribution (the Lancaster House ‘agreement’ notwithstanding), and whilst recognizing the conniving and hypocritical role of the Brits in the process (what else is new?), Mugabe, who cares not a whit about what the rest of the world thinks about his policies, has his sights firmly fixed on the Zimbabweans themselves and staying in power at all costs.

And as long as Mugabe left Britain’s ‘kith and kin’ alone (the settler farmers), it was quite happy to let Zanu-PF spout all kinds of socialist rhetoric, as long as he didn't actually implement any of it. Thus all the statements out of the West about the ‘miracle’ of Zimbabwe, the “bread basket” of Southern Africa.

Known and very popular cialis coupon which gives all the chance to receive a discount for a preparation which has to be available and exactly cialis coupons has been found in the distant room of this big house about which wood-grouses in the houses tell.

Zimbabwe, like its neighbor, South Africa, has (or at least had) a highly mechanized agricultural economy geared for export, with over 80% of the most productive land owned by a handful of white farmers. But here the parallel ends, for unlike South Africa, Zimbabwe’s rural population are largely peasant, subsistence farmers and importantly Zanu-PF’s power base. The divide between urban and rural could not be starker with the majority of the MDC’s supporters members of Zimbabwe’s small, urban working class.

And this is what it’s all about — land and the political power that goes with those who control it. Unfortunately, since independence, Zanu-PF has done little to actually deal with this issue failing, until recently to return the land to its rightful owners and then making a right mess of it because it did it for all the wrong reasons.

Ever since independence was gained in 1980, Zimbabwe has been a one-party state with Mugabe long proclaiming an allegedly socialist, anti-Western message without a single bleat of protest from the UK, even knighting the guy (just this week withdrawn by the ‘Queen’). So what changed? Why has Mugabe become the man the West loves to hate?

Basically, it’s sheer convenience together with a deeply ingrained racism that has propelled Mugabe into the media meat grinder and for no other purpose than to rationalize its own illegal actions of intervention and mass murder in the name of human rights and democracy.

We saw the same demonization of Myanmar (or Burma as the West chooses to continue calling it) even as major Western oil cartels continue to suck oil from the ground.

The pattern is plain for all to see: keep diverting attention away from the actions of the pirates by making a big song and dance about other countries’ when the reality is that the West doesn't give a damn about the people of Zimbabwe, Myanmar, Iraq, Afghanistan, Palestine, Venezuela, Cuba, or any country that fits the profile—allegedly anti-democratic, trashing human rights, this is after all, the current propaganda line of the West, a case of do as I say but don’t do as I do.

I think the following sums up one of the the results of interfering so blatantly in what are the internal affairs of the sovereign state of Zimbabwe regardless of what you think of the Zanu-PF,

“And yet the effective cancellation of the election [after the MDC’s withdrawal from the presidential runoff], followed by Tsvangirai’s calls for the United Nations, the African Union and South Africa to intervene in order to prevent a ‘genocide’, also shows up the dangers of internationalising local conflicts. The events of the past 24 hours demonstrate that Western governments’ relentless exploitation of the Zimbabwe crisis has helped to disenfranchise the Zimbabwean people. Literally. The logic of Western pressure has made the MDC reliant on the favour and flattery of external forces, rather than on the grit and the votes of its own mass support base.” — ‘Disenfranchising the people of Zimbabwe’ By Brendan O’Neill, Spiked, 23 June, 2008
But then this is the entire point of the exercise, to back Mugabe into a corner, make Mugabe the centre of attention. Had the UK really wanted to solve the land issue in Zimbabwe, it could have assisted the Zimbabwean government in compensating the settlers and helped the government in the development process (as it promised to do), for example in training and education to assist Zimbabwean peasant farmers in making the transition to mechanized farming. As for the MDC, I think their leader Morgan Tsvangirai is a political half-wit, he should have stuck to running the trade unions. He has so compromised himself with his choice of ‘friends’, let alone his judgement, or lack of it, that he has really screwed up what was, in the early days at least, a real opportunity to create a viable alternative to Mugabeism, which as a political (let alone economic) solution to post-colonial Zimbabwe, has clearly failed.

Accusations that Tsvangirai is in the pay of foreign agents, may or may not be true, I have no way of knowing but regardless, it's his political cowardice that undermines him and finally calling for foreign intervention reveals his complete lack of political courage.

The land question, something that is at the core of existence in every agrarian society, has been used by Mugabe to win votes and by so doing he has played right into the hands of the Western powers. Contrast Zimbabwe's Mugabe with Venezuela's Chavez. Sure, they’ve tried their damnest to demonize him too, but because his real power resides in the people, Western propaganda campaigns have not achieved the desired result, to isolate and present him as an 'extremist'.

Mugabe for his part, has been very astute at exploiting the ‘Pan Africanist’ position viz a vis the black-white issue, again this is all for domestic consumption but still it’s up to the Zimbabwean people to decide what happens. More’s the pity that Tsvangarai is an inept and totally compromised politician.

As usual it’s the role of the Western media that is central to the process. Without its active complicity in covering up the crimes of the West and its participation in the Mugabe diversion, the USUK axis could not get away with its own anti-democratic and illegal actions around the planet.

The BBC are the worst culprits, conducting an endless diatribe against Mugabe, even accusing him of genocide. It’s reached the point where I just can’t watch the BBC news anymore, nearly every news broadcast opens with a story about Mugabe in what has to be a government-inspired propaganda blitz. The last BBC diatribe I watched found the reporter calling for military intervention.

But the UK, as the original ‘broker’ between Ian Smith’s pre-independence regime and the liberation movements of that time (1979-80) puts it in a difficult position, thus we read in a BBC Today story, the following:

“Long after his name ceased to resonate in British politics it is still possible to go to Zanu-PF rallies in Harare and hear a blood-curdling denunciation of Harold Wilson, and the pernicious treacheries of the 1960s and 70s. “This is of course understood in the British government, which wants the conflict to be between Robert Mugabe and the world in general.” — ‘Zimbabwe awaits day of reckoning’ By Allan Little, 24 June, 2008. BBC Today Programme

You betcha! No flies on whoever wrote this. The last thing the UK wants is the history of successive British governments’ (both Labour and Tory) double-dealings in Zimbabwe being exposed as it connived to protect its investments and the white settlers (the majority of which are of British ‘stock’). In part, it explains why, unlike its sanctions drives against other countries, with Zimbabwe they have targeted individuals (could it be because Barclays Bank is a major investor in Zimbabwe?).

Whatever one thinks of Zanu-PF’s policies, demonizing the country, because this is the end-product of the vicious propaganda campaign being conducted, we have to remember that the propaganda blitz is aimed not at Mugabe or the Zimbabwean people but at our domestic population (just as Mugabe’s propaganda about the evil Brits is aimed at his support base).

Mugabe’s shenanagins are insignificant when set against the USUK murder in Iraq and Afghanistan or the actions of the settler government of Israel in its genocidal activities in the Occupied Territories, thus by focusing in on an individual, by making it personal, masks the political reality of imperial intervention wherever it chooses to.

The propaganda blitz has two objectives: 1) to divert attention away from the crisis of capital and the loss of legitimacy in the West and, 2) to justify its interventionist policies around the world, based as they are on the fiction of spreading human rights and democracy.

Some of us on the left seem to be defending Mugabe for all the wrong reasons in a perverse version of ‘if you’re not for us you must be against us’, but unless as socialists we adopt a principled position and expose the underlying reasons for the media blitz, we are doomed to be caught between a rock and a hard place, for it’s not a case of defending or attacking Mugabe but of exposing the phony human rights message being peddled by the pirates.
More from this author:
NATO’s Inferno (10611 Hits)
Civilised (adjective): cultured, educated, refined, enlightened, polite, elegant, sophisticated, urbane Civilise (verb): to enlighten, educate,...
Leaving the Scene of the Crime? (10492 Hits)
by William Bowles “ The Armed Forces Press Service recently quoted Army Chief of Staff General Peter J. Schoomaker as saying that the current...
Crisis Management (10122 Hits)
by William Bowles Perhaps the most difficult thing to do when dealing with current events is to establish the link between economics and politics....
Capitalism – past its sell-by date? (11678 Hits)
by William Bowles Review: The Chávez Code – Cracking US Intervention in Venezuela by Eva Golinger Perhaps the greatest triumph of...
Capitalism first – climate last (11501 Hits)
by William Bowles I think it should be pretty clear to all by now that regardless that the ruling elites of the planet know what’s in store...
Related Articles:
No-brainer: Hillary loves Dick (Cheney, that is) (7756 Hits)
by Mickey Z. When you're bored, get on board. For some that might mean a surfboard, a snowboard, or maybe a skateboard. For Vice President Dick...
Is Another Recession Looming? Growth Slows, Housing Fizzles (7963 Hits)
By Seth Sandronsky   U.S. economic growth rose at an annual rate of 1.6 percent in July–September, the slowest in more than three...
They Hate Our Freedom: The Truth about the Military Commissions Act (11130 Hits)
By Aaron Sussman On October 17th, with Dick Cheney, Alberto Gonzales, and Donald Rumsfeld standing behind him, George W. Bush solemnly ...
"Americans Can't Handle Another Impeachment" Is Republican Propaganda. Don't Be Deceived. (12636 Hits)
by Linda Milazzo "Americans can't handle another impeachment."  So say the supporters of George W. Bush in their anti-impeachment...
Zionism: Pitting the West Against Islam (10347 Hits)
by M. Shahid Alam It is tempting to celebrate the creation of Israel as a great triumph, perhaps the greatest in Jewish history. Indeed, the...

Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Comments (4)add comment

Alisdair Budd said:

Dear sir,

I have no way of knowing whether the allegations that you masturbate to a frenzy over pictures of starving zimbabwean aids orphans, whilst screaming anti-western slogans is true, one way or anoher, but I do know the situation in Zimbabwe, from being in day to day contact with people there. (black if you want to know)

Zimbabwe and people such as yourself have made Colonialists look good, and try to give a good name to those who will deny food supplements to children on the basis of who their parents voted for.

When all is said and done, and we finally find out how many zims are left alive, you migiht finally understand why most members of the Black Diaspora hate you, and Mugabe, and Zanu, and Mbeki, and the ANC, and the AU and the SADC, for supporting those who torture poor black africans to death for thinking they were free.

and how you have managed to make the west look good by their concern for Blac Poeple's Human rights and right to live, in spite of people such as yourself who write articles like the above.

(incidentaly with no knowledge of the counry itself and about a country that does not have a free press and where you can be beaten to a pulp for being seen with the wrong imported newspaper in your hands if reading it on the street.)

Perhaps you'd like to stop trying to get off on balck People's misery and write to Mugabe asking him to lift the ban on NGOs so that dying black people can get the (Evil West Racist Neo-colonialist's) donated hiv drugs and food supplement that Mugabe and zanu are currenlty banning them from providing.
July 09, 2008
Votes: +0

Stephen said:

Lets not confuse issues please
I am a black Zimbabwean that has suffered for many years under Mugabe. Firstly I question the source of your statistics regarding the size of the urban population. There are many millions of urban Zimbabweans that have emigrated such that if they were included on the voter's roll I doubt that we would be able to carry on speaking of the mainly rural population that largely supports ZANU.

My main contribution however is that despite all the failings of the West would cannot in any way justify Mugabe's actions. Just as Bin Laden has a case about the West's abuse of the rest of the world it does not justify his actions killing innocent people on September 11. Even though the Iraq situation has gone terribly wrong in many respects we must still acknowledge that Saddam was a mass murderer and deserved what he got. Mugabe is a murderer and should be behind bars. The fact that the West has done many bad things themselves should not negate the evil that these men have done.
July 09, 2008
Votes: +0

Amy H said:

Oh Steve
Steven, will all regards. You seem to think the west gives a crap about you or Zimbabwe. Let me assure you, the people do while the governments do not.
July 09, 2008
Votes: +0

OON said:

AMY: you need to sympathise
is that a nice word to say about others? i hope you learn to put yourself into other people`s shoes. in fact i am not from Zimbabwe, but i decided not to side any party either. i do not support both Mugabe or Tsivangarai.as they all sound very greedy for power. but i sympathise with any one who suffered because of what is going on in Zimbabwe.
July 15, 2008
Votes: +0

Write comment
smaller | bigger



Top 123