Home     Writers     Op/Ed     Book Reviews     News     Bookstore     Photoshops     Submit     Search     Contact Us     Advertise  
  You are here: 

Tue

05

Dec

2006

Media Sham for Iraq War -- It’s Happening Again
Tuesday, 05 December 2006 02:03
By Norman Solomon

The lead-up to the invasion of Iraq has become notorious in the annals of American journalism. Even many reporters, editors and commentators who fueled the drive to war in 2002 and early 2003 now acknowledge that major media routinely tossed real journalism out the window in favor of boosting war.

But it’s happening again.

The current media travesty is a drumbeat for the idea that the U.S. war effort must keep going. And again, in its news coverage, the New York Times is a bellwether for the latest media parade to the cadence of the warfare state.

During the run-up to the invasion, news stories repeatedly told about Iraqi weapons of mass destruction while the Times and other key media outlets insisted that their coverage was factually reliable. Now the same media outlets insist that their coverage is analytically reliable.

Instead of authoritative media information about aluminum tubes and mobile weapons labs, we’re now getting authoritative media illumination of why a swift pullout of U.S. troops isn’t realistic or desirable. The result is similar to what was happening four years ago -- a huge betrayal of journalistic responsibility.

The WMD spin was in sync with official sources and other establishment-sanctified experts, named and unnamed. The anti-pullout spin is in sync with official sources and other establishment-sanctified experts, named and unnamed.

During the weeks since the midterm election, the New York Times news coverage of Iraq policy options has often been heavy-handed, with carefully selective sourcing for prefab conclusions. Already infamous is the Nov. 15 front-page story by Michael Gordon under the headline “Get Out of Iraq Now? Not So Fast, Experts Say.” A similar technique was at play Dec. 1 with yet another “News Analysis,” this time by reporter David Sanger, headlined “The Only Consensus on Iraq: Nobody’s Leaving Right Now.”

Typically, in such reportage, the sources harmonizing with the media outlet’s analysis are chosen from the cast of political characters who helped drag the United States into making war on Iraq in the first place.

What’s now going on in mainline news media is some kind of repetition compulsion. And, while media professionals engage in yet another round of conformist opportunism, many people will pay with their lives.

With so many prominent American journalists navigating their stories by the lights of big Washington stars, it’s not surprising that so much of the news coverage looks at what happens in Iraq through the lens of the significance for American power.

Viewing the horrors of present-day Iraq with star-spangled eyes, New York Times reporters John Burns and Kirk Semple wrote -- in the lead sentence of a front-page “News Analysis” on Nov. 29 -- that “American military and political leverage in Iraq has fallen sharply.”

The second paragraph of the Baghdad-datelined article reported: “American fortunes here are ever more dependent on feuding Iraqis who seem, at times, almost heedless to American appeals.”

The third paragraph reported: “It is not clear that the United States can gain new traction in Iraq...”

And so it goes -- with U.S. media obsessively focused on such concerns as “American military and political leverage,” “American fortunes” and whether “the United States can gain new traction in Iraq.”

With that kind of worldview, no wonder so much news coverage is serving nationalism instead of journalism.

_____________________________

Norman Solomon’s book “War Made Easy: How Presidents and Pundits Keep Spinning Us to Death” is out in paperback. For information, go to www.WarMadeEasy.com

More from this author:
Saddam’s Unindicted Co-Conspirator: Donald Rumsfeld (7430 Hits)
By Norman Solomon Saddam Hussein has received a death sentence for crimes he committed more than a year before Donald Rumsfeld shook his hand in...
The New Media Offensive for the Iraq War (10433 Hits)
By Norman Solomon The American media establishment has launched a major offensive against the option of withdrawing U.S. troops from Iraq. ...
Is the USA the Center of the World? (6641 Hits)
By Norman Solomon Some things don’t seem to change. Five years after I wrote this column in the form of a news dispatch, it seems more...
Powell, Baker, Hamilton -- Thanks for Nothing (8020 Hits)
By Norman Solomon When Colin Powell endorsed the Iraq Study Group report during his Dec. 17 appearance on “Face the Nation,” it was...
Announcing the P.U.-litzer Prizes for 2006 (9097 Hits)
by Norman Solomon Competition has been fierce for the fifteenth annual P.U.-litzer Prizes Many can plausibly lay claim to stinky media...
Related Articles:
Dear Dubya: The Iraq Solution! (9948 Hits)
Hey there Georgie Boy, long time no speak. From what I’ve been hearing, you’ve had a rough time as of late. As always, I’m here to help. So...
Why Bush Smiles: Victory is at Hand in Iraq (11997 Hits)
Despite George W. Bush's ostentatious bucking up of the Iraqi government yesterday, it is very likely that there will indeed be an...
Sandinista! US Set to Harpoon Its Nicaraguan Moby Dick Again (8669 Hits)
by William Blum Captain Ahab had his Moby Dick. Inspector Javert had his Jean Valjean. The United States has its Fidel Castro. Washington...
U.S. Service Academy Graduates Unite Against Illegal Iraq War (12269 Hits)
Atlantic Free Press Netherlands – (October 26, 2006) – The overwhelming response by alumni of United States service academies to the...
The New Media Offensive for the Iraq War (10433 Hits)
By Norman Solomon The American media establishment has launched a major offensive against the option of withdrawing U.S. troops from Iraq. ...


Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Trackback(0)
Comments (1)add comment

eriekayaker said:

0
...
And the mainstream press will accomplish no more good in its current campaign of opinion manipulation that it did in its first WMD/rah rah let's go to war PR effort. I'm sitting back laughing as I watch our feckless politicians, has been power-brokers (Baker, Hamilton ad nauseam) or the current crop of "talking heads" be they retired generals or the "opinion elites" pontificate over what is to be done with Iraq. The TRUE answer is of course, nothing. Iraq is lost, we blew what chance we had to succeed there back in 2003/2004. The US is now a bit player on this gory, blood-soaked stage. Thanks to our invasion/occupation, forces have been unleashed whose unalterable goal is our vanquishment and humiliation. Thanks to our pompousness, our hubris and our egoism, that's exactly what will happen.
 
December 06, 2006
Votes: +0

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 

adsense

Top