Home     Writers     Op/Ed     Book Reviews     News     Bookstore     Photoshops     Submit     Search     Contact Us     Advertise  
  You are here: 

Thu

04

Oct

2007

The Topic of Cancer
Thursday, 04 October 2007 22:21
by Mickey Z.
When actress Farrah Fawcett recently sought out "alternative" cancer treatment, she was greeted with predictable media scorn. For example, ABCNews.com (October 3) characterized such a choice as a "last-ditch attempt to find a cure, one that brings the patient into a murky world of offshore clinics and unproven courses of treatment that are scorned by the medical establishment."

Speaking of the "medical establishment," ABC News quoted Barrie Cassileth, chief of the Integrative Medicine Department at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Cassileth said patients pursuing "alternative" approaches are "signing their own death certificate." Dr. Cassileth added: "I would say they are wasting time they could otherwise spend happier and with their families."

Almost 600,000 American die of cancer each year (roughly 1500 per day) and a new case is diagnosed every seven seconds. Yet, the Western medical priesthood stigmatizes alternatives and aggressively defends its Holy Trinity of cancer treatment: surgery, radiation, and of course, chemotherapy.
"We've been told that it's only the treatments of orthodox medicine that have passed careful scientific scrutiny involving double-blind placebo-controlled studies," write Gary Null and Dr. Debora Rasio. "Concomitantly, we've been told that alternative or complementary health care has no science to back it up, only anecdotal evidence. These two ideas have led to the widely accepted 'truths' that anyone offering an alternative or complementary approach is depriving patients of the proven benefits of safe and effective care, and that people not only don't get well with alternative care, but are actually endangered by it."
This includes the doctors themselves. As reported by John Robbins in Reclaiming Our Health, the percentage of oncologists who, if they had cancer, would not participate in chemotherapy trials due to its "ineffectiveness and its unacceptable toxicity" is 75%. Conversely, the percentage of Americans with cancer that receive chemotherapy is‹you guessed it: 75%.

By odd coincidence, there was another October 3 ABCNews.com story on the topic of cancer. It seems a Long Island woman was told she had breast cancer, underwent a double mastectomy, and then learned that the lab made a mistake. She didn't have cancer. Deemed a "mix-up," the whole thing was blamed on "a technician who admitted cutting corners while labeling tissue specimens."

Obviously, "murky" and "unproven" are in the eye of the beholder. But until American health care consumers move toward awareness, self-education, and prevention, all they're doing is debating which pen to use when "signing their own death certificate."

Mickey Z. can be found on the Web at http://www.mickeyz.net.
More from this author:
Who killed Michael Moore? (Why and what's the reason for?) (10804 Hits)
(Inspired by the recent assassination of Russian journalist Anna Politkovskaya) There's no shortage of outrage on the Left. Plenty...
"Boiling Point" - Eroding Freedom: From John Adams to George W. Bush (12974 Hits)
Put a frog into a pot of boiling water, the well-known parable begins, and out that frog will jump to escape the obvious danger. Put that same...
Read This Before You Vote (11881 Hits)
If one were to believe the hype, nothing less than the fate the civilized world is riding on the results of the upcoming midterm elections....
Nukes: Iran and North Korea are not the problem (13670 Hits)
by Mickey Z. Thanks to the nuclear aspirations of North Korea and Iran, there's no shortage of rhetoric along these lines: "We can't let...
When "anti-war" doesn't mean anti-war (6301 Hits)
by Mickey Z. A casual stroll through most major U.S. cities would provide ample opportunity to encounter numerous stickers, buttons,...
Related Articles:
Beyond Hiroshima - The Non-Reporting Of Fallujah's Cancer Catastrophe (2252 Hits)
by Media Lens Compassion is sometimes a central theme of media reporting. On August 25, journalists across the UK described how a British...


Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Trackback(0)
Comments (1)add comment

a guest said:

0
Dell - work at home
Mickey Z: You are brave to write this honest article. Cancer treatment is a massive business in USA. So little attention is given to prevention. We now have Pink Breast Cancer publicity push and women are reading and listening and acting. But, what about smoking/lung cancer? And colon cancer? And the list is a very long one. If someone in your family is dying while receiving legitimate treatment wouldn't you seek alternative help like Mrs. Martin Luther King did? You are right, prevention is the real answer, but who will change their lifetime eating habits, their mental/emotional stamp and their destructive habits. If we Americans were to slow down on our consumption how would China survive financially? How would the Arab nations and Israel hang on to their wealth? If we concentrated on our physical and mental health and less on buying and keeping possessions the story definitely would be different. But, who am I to judge or say: I am just a medical transcriptionist typing away here at home. Let the war continue & no health coverage for our children. We are a compassionate society?
 
October 05, 2007 | url
Votes: +0

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 

adsense

Top