Home     Writers     Op/Ed     Book Reviews     News     Bookstore     Photoshops     Submit     Search     Contact Us     Advertise  
  You are here: 





Senator Graham, Double Standard, Noble Standard, Or NO Standards
Saturday, 17 March 2007 13:58
by Linda Milazzo

A most intriguing line of questioning transpired during the Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing on the firings of the eight U.S. Attorneys. During Senator Lindsey Graham's interrogation of the former U.S. Attorneys, the first-term South Carolina Senator made some very telling remarks.

Graham began his round of questioning by asking the four U.S. Attorneys how long they had served in office. Theyprovided their tenures in office, which for each was under six years. Senator Graham replied:

"Those are long stints aren't they as U.S. Attorneys? In my state I'm trying to get as many people through that job as I possibly can. Particularly young lawyers who I see to have great potential serving down the road on the Bench... Do you all agree this is an employment at will job?"

Interesting. Graham supports the rotation of leadership, and abdicating jobs so others can serve.

Graham went on to say, "Let me just say this about each one of ya. I think you all understand the nature of the job. That it's a political appointment but it's also a public responsibility. Once you get there it's not your job to play politics. It's your job to enforce the law and these are long stints."

Known and very popular cialis coupon which gives all the chance to receive a discount for a preparation which has to be available and exactly cialis coupons has been found in the distant room of this big house about which wood-grouses in the houses tell.

Again with the long stints. Senator Graham most certainly believes six years is a long enough time for anyone to hold office. Graham continues:

"I mean in South Carolina I don't know what's the longest serving U.S. Attorney in an eight year period, but I consciously try to cycle people through just because it's a wonderful experience to have. It's not a lifetime job. It's gonna end one day and the more people who can have that experience the better.... The right reason to me [to leave that job] is just I want some other people to have that experience."

Well, Senator Graham, I certainly hope you apply those same standards of fairness and courtesy to yourself. Clearly you believe jobs should not be held for a long length of time. Instead they should be passed on to as many people as possible. So, in the spirit of fairness, will you impose these same time limits on yourself? Will you step down from your Senate seat at the end of your six years to make room for another? Someone with a new vitality to reinvigorate the Senate seat from the great state of South Carolina?

I listened carefully to the testimonies of the four fired U.S. Attorneys when they appeared before you. Frankly, each one of them is as intelligent as you. Each one of them shares your knowledge of the law. Each one of them has been a hard-working public servantlike you.

True, you were elected and they were selected. But really, isn't an election a selection after all? Weren't you selected by the people of South Carolina? In fact, weren't you in effect, "appointed" by the people of South Carolina? Anddon't you serve at the pleasure of the people of South Carolina like the U.S. Attorneys served at the pleasure of the President of the United States?

Indeed, your similarities are striking. As a member of the Judiciary Committee you perform many of the same duties. You research the law. You take legal positions. You prepare witnesses. You cross-examine witnesses. The likenesses are strong.

So... if it's noble to hand power and position to others to better them and to better the system, then why don't you do the same? If selflessness is expected of these former U.S. Attorneys, then why shouldn't it be expected of you? You believe in term limits. Why don't you term limit YOU??

In the words of Constitutional lawyer, Steven Rohde, pertaining to your statements to the U.S. Attorneys,"Applying Lindsay Graham's standards to his own time on the Senate Judiciary Committee, I guess he has outlived his usefulness and should promptly resign."

There you have it, Senator Graham. Mr. Rohde has suggested a compromise. If you resign from the Judiciary Committee you can still keep your seat in the Senate. That's not as magnanimous as handing over your Senate seat. But at least it's a start.

So what shall it be, Senator Graham? A double standard? Anoble standard? Or NO standards at all?
More from this author:
Comic Relief, Celebrity and Remembering Little Harry (9004 Hits)
by Linda Milazzo Hooray for Hollywood! Yes, I'm a believer. I'm not an 'ignoranti' who believes celebrities are vapid and have nothing to...
"Americans Can't Handle Another Impeachment" Is Republican Propaganda. Don't Be Deceived. (12686 Hits)
by Linda Milazzo "Americans can't handle another impeachment."  So say the supporters of George W. Bush in their anti-impeachment...
by Linda Milazzo Other than 2002 Nobel Prize Laureate, Jimmy Carter, no American politician has spoken honestly about Israel's occupation of...
Kennedys, Bushes and Oil: Public Interest vs. Self Interest (11167 Hits)
by Linda Milazzo    The history of the United States is filled with prominent families who achieved wealth, power and influence...
The Dissapperance of George P. Bush (8435 Hits)
by Linda Milazzo It was the year 2000. The new millennium. It featured a rising new star from a prominent American family. His name was George....
Related Articles:
Freshman Class War: New Senator Sends Message on Economic Injustice (11958 Hits)
by Chris Floyd I don't know that much about Jim Webb. I don't know how he will actually vote when lobbyist push comes to corporate shove in...
Double Standards in the Phony War: Small Errors Cost Big Bucks, but Enormous Lies Remain Standing (9089 Hits)
by Winter Patriot Here's something you don't see every day! Papers compensate man wrongly implicated in alleged bomb plot: A group...
GOP Senator Lashes Administration For "Insensitive" Troop Treatment (4782 Hits)
by Bob Geiger In a vivid sign that George W. Bush's incompetent handling of the Iraq war has fully reached across the political aisle and...
Supporting the Troops? Senator Webb Puts Bush in the Cross-hairs (4996 Hits)
by Walter C. Uhler During President Bush's State of the Union speech last night and during Senator Jim Webb's Democratic Party response, two...
Offering a Response to Senator Webb - What America Really Needs to Hear (7013 Hits)
By Joshua Frank Shortly after President Bush’s State of the Union address last week Jim Webb, the freshman Senator from Virginia,...

Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Comments (0)add comment

Write comment
smaller | bigger



Top 123