Home     Writers     Op/Ed     Book Reviews     News     Bookstore     Photoshops     Submit     Search     Contact Us     Advertise  
  You are here: 





Why Fisk is wrong about Lebanon
Sunday, 28 January 2007 16:50
by Mike Whitney

“This is how the 1975-90 conflict began in Lebanon. Outbreaks of sectarian hatred, appeals for restraint, promises of aid from Western and Arab nations and a total refusal to understand that this is how civil wars begin”.
Robert Fisk, “World ignores Signs of Civil War in Lebanon” UK Independent 1-27-07

Robert Fisk is all wrong about Lebanon. The country is not on the brink of another “civil war”. It's been subsumed in an “imperial war” engineered in Tel Aviv and Washington. He’s also mistaken in thinking that the Paris 3 Conference is designed to “save” Lebanon from the mountain of debt which piled up after Israel’s destructive 34 day war. The real purpose of the $7.6 billion in loans is to shackle Lebanon to the international lending institutions that are demanding additional taxes on the poor, more privatization of state-run industries, and restructuring the economy to meet the requirements of the global banking elite.

According to a recent article by Chris Marsden in countercurrents:

“Only a fraction of the loans will be spent on reconstruction projects. Most will go towards servicing Lebanon’s short-term debt and therefore back into the coffers of the imperialist governments and financial institutions, while leaving Lebanon’s long-term debts to climb even higher. The rest will go into paying the Lebanese army (and security services) in order to suppress the opposition in the Shia areas in the south of the country. And, once again, any money given will be made conditional on the government implementing the reforms demanded by the IMF and World Bank.”

Known and very popular cialis coupon which gives all the chance to receive a discount for a preparation which has to be available and exactly cialis coupons has been found in the distant room of this big house about which wood-grouses in the houses tell.

This is the real war — the class war — that continues to be directed at the people in developing world.

How many times have we seen the World Bank and IMF swoop down on their prey after a nation has been savaged by war only to apply the vice-grips of massive debt and set up another corporate colony? The rise of sectarianism and the “clash of civilizations” bunkum is just the mask that conceals the real struggle; the ongoing war and exploitation of the people who have no voice in government.

Here’s a question for Fisk: Is there any doubt now that the US and Israel used the UN to push Syrian troops out of Lebanon just so they could execute their bloody plan to invade the country and set up a puppet regime in Beirut? Or was that merely a coincidence?

And, is there any doubt that World Bank president, Paul Wolfowitz, knew that he would be used in Phase 2 of the assault on Lebanese sovereignty by providing more economy-busting loans?

The US military is just the left hand of the banking establishment. One hand washes the other.

It’s the perfect system; the US-Israeli war machine flattens an entire country and then their buddies in the in the corporate-banking business rake in the profits from loans and reconstruction contracts. At the same time, they insist that the “New Lebanon” be rebuilt according to the neoliberal model; the same economic model that has kept Latin America and Africa in abject poverty for 2 decades.

Fisk is wrong; it’s not “sectarian hatred” that is driving the war, but outside powers that are using their proxies within Lebanon to achieve their geopolitical objectives. In other words, this not the beginning of civil war, but a continuation of the 34 Day war; the deliberate pulverizing of Lebanon to create an US-Israeli protectorate in a critical area of the Middle East. Future pipeline corridors and regional hegemony require a compliant pro-western government in Beirut. That’s why the Bush administration has armed and trained the massive security apparatus of Prime Minister Fouad Siniora, so he could succeed where Israel failed, by crushing Hezbollah and the pro-democracy movement.

On the other hand, Hezbollah is demanding that the Siniora respect the constitution and step down to allow for the formation of a unity government. That is what is REQUIRED under the law (after six members of the Parliament walked out, it effectively disbanded the government) and that is why Hezbollah has been camped out in the center of the city since December 1.

If the Bush administration was serious about democracy, they’d throw their support behind the opposition. (Hezbollah and Michel Aoun’s Free Patriotic Movement) But then we know what happens when the will of the people clashes with the aims of the administration. (check the war against the democratically-elected government of Hamas)

Siniora’s political base is limited to Sunnis, some parts of the Christian community, and the Lebanese business elite (Hariri). Some of them like, Samir Geagea, “the ex-civil war militia killer” are connected to right-wing extremist organizations. These are the groups who stand to benefit the most from an open confrontation with Hezbollah. Washington needs them to conceal its dirty war; a war that Bush stepped up last week when he authorized the CIA “to take covert action against Hezbollah as part of a secret plan to help the Lebanese government prevent the spread of Iranian influence. Senators and congressmen have been briefed on the classified ‘non-lethal presidential finding’ that allows the CIA to provide financial and logistical support for Prime Minister, Fouad Siniora”. (UK Telegraph)

Consider this: Siniora is freely violating Lebanese sovereignty to conduct covert operations against the very people (Hezbollah) who stood alone in defending Lebanon from Israeli invasion. Additionally, he is accepting this “assistance” from the United States knowing that it was the Bush administration that provided the laser-guided munitions and cluster-bombs which were used to kill Lebanese nationals just months ago.

And one last thing; despite his promises, Siniora has made no effort to help the poor Shias in the South rebuilt their homes and communities. Much like the victims of Katrina, the Shia have been left to languish in the ruins created by Israel’s relentless bombing raids.

Is it any wonder why Nasrallah and Aoun want to get rid of Siniora?

It should be noted that the Bush administration sees no inconsistency in a policy that supports Sunnis in Lebanon, but Shias in Iraq. The rule of thumb appears to be: “If our actions create greater mayhem and suffering for Muslims, then we are on the right course.”

Hezbollah chief, Hassan Nasrallah, has wisely ordered his people to stop their acts of civil disobedience and to get off the streets to avoid further violence. Three Shias were reportedly killed by snipers at the university. Already we can see the familiar tactics which have been used in cities in Iraq.

Nasrallah, is portrayed in the western press as a provocateur, but he has kept the peace for the last 2 months and is committed to preventing another civil war. Just days ago, he told his people, “Even if they kill 1,000 of us, we will not use our weapons against them.”

He also added, “We have the political, popular and organizational strength to bring down the unconstitutional government at any time. What has prevented the fall of this government is not the support of the western powers but the opposition’s will to preserve civil peace in the country.”

But it’s likely that Nasrallah will not be able to stop the fighting; already events are beyond his control. Washington is preparing to open another front in its ongoing war on terror and is looking for a showdown with Hezbollah. The neoconservative ideal of “creative destruction” is now in full-flower and has extended the conflict from the northern tip of Afghanistan to the southern coast of Somalia swallowing up an immense swath of the Middle East and Central Asia. This is the “total war” the neocons promised when Bush took office.It isn’t civil war, but the calculated destruction of an entire region by the imperial powers.
More from this author:
The Breaking Point (10925 Hits)
It was another bad week in Iraq. While bodies were piling up in the Baghdad morgue and the militia fighting steadily intensified, the Bush...
Barking Mad (20201 Hits)
It’s not a comforting thought, but it’s the truth. As the situation in Iraq continues to deteriorate and the feckless congress concedes more...
More “Culture Wars” Gibberish from nutcase David Brooks (16379 Hits)
Most of us know David Brooks as the balding goofball on “The Jim Lehrer News Hour” who shrugs his shoulders and giggles gleefully whenever...
Why does Thailand have all the Luck? (11771 Hits)
About 2 weeks ago, 10 Soviet-era tanks clanked-along the main thoroughfare in downtown Bangkok and stopped in front of the Presidential Palace. Once...
The Mushroom Cloud over the U.N. (10181 Hits)
  The Bush administration has repeatedly rejected North Korea’s appeals for a “non-aggression” pact. Bush believes that he has the...
Related Articles:
Why Nancy Pelosi Has it Wrong on Impeachment (12732 Hits)
by Dave Lindorff   Forget her "Pledge," She Took an Oath: Why Pelosi is Wrong on Impeachment House minority leader Nancy Pelosi...
They Hate Our Freedom: The Truth about the Military Commissions Act (11178 Hits)
By Aaron Sussman On October 17th, with Dick Cheney, Alberto Gonzales, and Donald Rumsfeld standing behind him, George W. Bush solemnly ...
So the Democrats Won – What About the American Empire? (10124 Hits)
by Shepherd Bliss The Democratic Party prevailed in the Nov. 7 midterm elections. "We’ve just moved out of a straightjacket," a...
“America’s moment in the Middle East is about to end” (9457 Hits)
by Mike Whitney There are no “accidents” in Middle East politics. This week’s assassination of Lebanese Industry Minister, Pierre...
The Rumsfeld Memo: “I was just about to change everything….Really!?!” (10964 Hits)
by Mike Whitney By now, everyone has heard about Rumsfeld’s memo. It was leaked to the New York Times supposedly without Rumsfeld’s...

Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Comments (3)add comment

a guest said:

Hardly a Surprise
This seems to be Fisk's modus operandi wherever he goes in the Muslim world. He essentially takes one side and champions it over another, usually choosing that favored by imperialists, left or right. This has generally been a sunni/shia thing of late in Lebanon and earlier in Iraq. "Nationalists" are his particular target in many cases.

But even in the first Gulf War, he slandered Turkey while it was assisting Iraqi Kurdish refugees, trying to further drive a wedge between Turks and Kurds which imperialists have managed to do rather successfully since WWI.

Creating and sustaining religious and ethnic divisions is the hallmark of imperialism. Fisk seems to be aiding this cause all too often.
January 28, 2007
Votes: +0

a guest said:

Fisk is not wrong.It is really a double whammy by the Imperialists.
West gave billions in loans to Hariri.Then he could not deliver on his promises to imperialist loan holders.So he was eliminated by those loanholders.Imperialists formula
is to destroy the country utterly,then put a puppet government and force the puppet government to award new
building contracts to the corporations from the lending
countries.Give the destroyed country new loans to build
a little and plunder the rest,with puppet government
promising to pay the total debt.Deduct the money due
from previous loan and give the rest of the loan money
to the puppet government,with instructions on how to
transfer that money in western banking heavens like
Bahamas or Cayman Island where it can not be traced.
Bahamas,Cayman Island and other destinations involved
in this kind of transactions are colonies of old impe-
rialist countries like Britain,France and US.In Lebanon's
case they want a puppet ruler because of its strategic
location,as well as puppet's commitment to payback the loans by several times the amount(by forcing to reduce the
exchange rate of $ and Lebanese currency)and helping the regional bully Israel to dominate the region and keep the holocast of Palestiniann people going.These so called Christian countries have killed a million civilian Iraqis
since 2003 for 2800 or so killed in World Trade Center attack.That is more than 300 times of 9/11 deaths.Iraq population 28 million,US population over 280 million,i.e
one tenth the population of US.Multiply the 300 by 10 and you get 3000 times.For every one killed in World Trade Center,they have killed 3000 Iraqis,not counting the thousands killed in Afghanistan by bombs and AC130 spectre gunships.You decide,how Christian are these invaders or
Christian Jihadis.
January 29, 2007
Votes: +0

a guest said:

finally, a decent analysis.
Thank you! Its refreshing to see an analysis that doesnt mimick the propaganda distributed in the States about "Iran's pro-syrian proxy", hezbollah, mounting a coup in Lebanon. All the news media very purposefully exclude the fact that the opposion is not only made up of Hezbollah and Amal, but also lebanon's largest christian party, The free Patriotic Movement. That party's leader, Aoun, fought hard to get Syria out of Lebanon. he is hardly fighting now to get them back in! This is an inconvinient truth that the West wants to bury. The tensions in lebanon are not pro-syrian or anti-syrian, just as they are not shia vs. sunni. They are better described as pro-US or anti-US, the rich in power fighting off the hordes of the poor and underrepresented.
January 29, 2007
Votes: +0

Write comment
smaller | bigger



Top 123