Home     Writers     Op/Ed     Book Reviews     News     Bookstore     Photoshops     Submit     Search     Contact Us     Advertise  
  You are here: 

Fri

19

Jan

2007

Hoover Institution Hack from Ann Coulter's School of History Slimes "Left" for 9/11
Friday, 19 January 2007 10:13
by Walter C. Uhler
Incredibly, on January 18, 2007, the Lost Angeles Times (no typo) published Dinesh D'Souza's thoroughly biased Op-Ed, "How The Left Led Us Into 9/11." Mr. D'Souza's article is riddled with errors and all-too-convenient omissions, suggesting both ignorance and fraud. Although a fellow at the Hoover Institution, D'Souza writes history (judging by his opinion piece), as if he studied under the tutelage of that historian-imbecile, Ann Coulter.

Consider that D'Souza expects Americans to believe that "the Clinton and Carter administrations made the U.S. look like a weak, attractive target for terrorists." Well, perhaps some Americans will - especially if they've never read a newspaper or history book devoted to the issue, if they've just returned from a thirty-year visit to Mars, or if they're the incompetents at the LA Times who published D'Souza's Op-Ed.

You see, D'Souza gets it wrong virtually every possible way it can be gotten wrong. Thus, when he blames President Carter for pulling "the rug out from under [Iran's] shah," thereby allowing the Ayatollah Khomeini and his forces to seize power, you will not find D'Souza acknowledging the conclusion reached, for example, by Kenneth Pollock: "The shah brought the Iranian Revolution on himself. At the strategic level, his many mistaken policies created tremendous animosity against the regime across the breadth of Iranian society." [Pollock, The Persian Puzzle, p. 137] According to Pollock, America's real "policy failure in Iran was to tie ourselves so tightly to the shah's regime." [Ibid]

More... Videos and Text after the Flip.


D'Souza also conveniently ignores the role that the Eisenhower administration played in engineering the coup d'etat in 1953 that overthrew Iran's democratically elected government of Prime Minister Muhammad Mussadiq. So traumatic was the coup and the subsequent twenty-five years of dictatorial rule under the shah, "that when the shah finally departed in 1979, many Iranians feared a repetition of 1953, which was one of the motives for the student seizure of the U.S. embassy." [Ibid, p. 68]

{flv}3006_guest_a_480{/flv}

D'Souza gets eaten alive by Stephen Colbert Part I


D'Souza omits mentioning the 1953 coup, because he already has dismissed "blowback" and "American colonialism" as factors that might explain why the Ayatollah Khomeini called America the "Great Satan." High school students should already know these facts, but not if the ideologue D'Souza is telling the story.

Equally erroneous and dishonest is D'Souza's claim that, thanks to Carter's role in producing Khomeini's regime of Islamic radicalism, the way was "paved" for Osama bin Laden and 9/11. Once again, D'Souza conveniently overlooks the fact that it was bin Laden's success (and the success of Islamic forces) in Afghanistan against the Soviet military - thanks to weapons supplied by the Reagan administration! - that inspired him to believe that the sole remaining imperialist power, the United States, could be defeated as well.

Finally, although D'Souza is correct to criticize the Clinton administration for its failure to kill bin Laden when it had the opportunity, he fails to note that President Clinton, unlike the Bush administration prior to 9/11, was almost obsessed with nailing bin Laden, notwithstanding the failures of his administration. The person to read on this subject is Richard A. Clarke (Against All Enemies), who served in both administrations -- not biased D'Souza.

{flv}3006_guest_b_480{/flv}

D'Souza gets eaten alive by Stephen Colbert Part II


Moreover, it's a matter of record that in January 2001, Clinton's CIA director, George Tenet, briefed President-elect Bush about the threats facing America and told him that the number one threat was Osama bin Laden and his al Qaeda terrorists. Yet, notwithstanding Tenet's warning, the Bush administration spent the nine months between its inauguration and the 9/11 attacks obsessively making plans to build a national missile defense (which still doesn't work) and to remove Saddam Hussein from power. Simply recall that the 9/11 attacks forced National Security Adviser, Condoleezza Rice, to cancel her speech addressing the need to build a national missile defense.

Bush's people blew off the warnings about al Qaeda; so much so, that when the National Security Council (NSC) principals finally met to address al Qaeda, the attack was just one week away. Keep in mind that numerous meetings of the NSC principals were held before 9/11 and many of them focused on Iraq.

Finally, simply recall Bush's words to Bob Woodward after 9/11: "The was a significant difference in my attitude after September 11. I was not on point, but I knew he [bin Laden] was a menace, and I knew he was a problem…But I didn't feel that sense of urgency, and my blood was not nearly as boiling." [Bush at War, p. 39] But, of course! Not when you are obsessed with missile defense and Iraq.

So much then for Dinesh D'Souza's biased and infantile assertions about "How the Left Led Us Into 9/11."

Walter C. Uhler is an independent scholar and freelance writer whose work has been published in numerous publications, including The Nation, the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, the Journal of Military History, the Moscow Times and the San Francisco Chronicle. He also is President of the Russian-American International Studies Association (RAISA).
 
More from this author:
The South Continues to "Make" Race: Will the Supreme Court Follow? (6922 Hits)
by Walter C. Uhler A Review of How Race is Made: Slavery, Segregation, and the Senses, by Mark M. Smith (University of North Carolina Press,...
Put on the Spot, Our Punk President Lies Yet Again (6357 Hits)
by Walter C. Uhler Whenever I hear President Bush tell another lie (or read that he has told another lie) I'm reminded of the Liar-in-Chief's...
Bringing the "Perps," Bush and Cheney, to Justice (5344 Hits)
by Walter C. Uhler A Review of U.S. v. Bush By Elizabeth de la Vega According to President Bush, Saddam Hussein was brought to...
FOX News Fascist, Gretchen Carlson, Swift-boats Sen. Kennedy's Opposition to Bush's "Surge" (5830 Hits)
by Walter C. Uhler Although none of the following news nuggets were found in the speech that President Bush delivered tonight, recently, we...
Stinky Inky, Part V: Dinesh D'Souza and the Smatterers at the Philadelphia Inquirer (7415 Hits)
by Walter C. Uhler This is how it works: The increasingly decadent and profit-driven book publishing business, which is "more concerned...
Related Articles:
Why Bush wants immunity from prosecution for war crimes (239134 Hits)
Although not as widely remarked as the elimination of habeas rights and the consecration of torture, the recently passed Senate torture legislation...
More “Culture Wars” Gibberish from nutcase David Brooks (11430 Hits)
Most of us know David Brooks as the balding goofball on “The Jim Lehrer News Hour” who shrugs his shoulders and giggles gleefully whenever...
"Boiling Point" - Eroding Freedom: From John Adams to George W. Bush (13193 Hits)
Put a frog into a pot of boiling water, the well-known parable begins, and out that frog will jump to escape the obvious danger. Put that same...
Mosaic TV - World News from the Middle East (14273 Hits)
Mosaic features selections from daily TV news programs produced by national and regional broadcasters throughout the Middle East....
From Liberating Spirituality to Oppressive Dogma: The Politics of Religion (18028 Hits)
By Mel Seesholtz, Ph.D. Spirituality is intrapersonal. It’s a liberating and uplifting awareness. It nurtures personal growth. It inspires...


Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Trackback(0)
Comments (8)add comment

a guest said:

0
...
Oh pffffft to you. The majority of the public WANTS to read varying views from many sources. The fact that you are so violently vehement in your attacks against this just really piques my interest more and I've ordered the book thanks to you. Must be some really good stuff to get your panties in such a wad and some supporting facts that you just can't explain????
Having traveled to more than a couple third world and muslim influenced countries, I am very open to the concepts offered by Dr. D'Souza as I have openly witnessed some of the stupid "assumptions" other societies believe. Take a trip and lose yourself among the masses, no fancy hotels and no tour groups, see if your perceptions change just a bit - or open your pitiful eyes to something other than pure hatred for a change. Stop attacking and start some meaningful dialogue....PLEASE!!!! Oh that's right, you get PAID to hate.
 
January 19, 2007
Votes: +0

a guest said:

0
...
Same guest here, couldn't quite resist the opportunity to point out how you initially attack the reader as ignorant if they don't jump on your bandwagon. What an elitist attitude to place yourself so high above all others, self-aggrandizement isn't a pretty characteristic and definitely something I hope that you take great pains to eliminate from your future writings. What a total turnoff in the second paragraph, what a total head case you are, what a total waste of my time reading your in-my-pocket verse.
 
January 19, 2007
Votes: +0

a guest said:

0
nasty guest. other art j. guest.
I can't stop making the pffft sound. I saw nothing in the article that justifies me having to keep making a pffft sound all day. pffft. pffft. thanks. Pffft!
 
January 19, 2007
Votes: +0

a guest said:

0
Hi Dinesh...
You really shouldn't take it so hard - I mean the first two comments are YOURS are they not? How's the view in Bush's ass?
 
January 19, 2007
Votes: +0

a guest said:

0
MSNBC - Worst Person in the World.
Dinesh D'Souza, embarrassing himself in print and in public since 1984, Thursday's Worst Person in the World. smilies/grin.gif smilies/grin.gif smilies/grin.gif smilies/grin.gif smilies/grin.gif

World's Worst Person: Dinesh D’Souz
 
January 19, 2007
Votes: +0

Russell Wellen said:

0
Colbert
He was on it the other night. He was another one of those guests who doesn't understand Colbert's persona -- Colbert ran rings around him. What a twerp.
 
January 19, 2007
Votes: +0

a guest said:

0
the point
Ah, but did the cultural left cause 9/11?
 
January 20, 2007
Votes: +0

a guest said:

0
No
The Cultural Left did not.

Two situations stick out in my mind - one is the installation of the Shah of Iran over a democratically elected leader and two is the situation in Israel concerning the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians.

And the author conveniently leaves out the fact that one of bin Laden's biggest beefs and the kindling for al Qaeda was the fact that US troops were on Sacred Soil in Saudi Arabia post Gulf War I. He wanted them out (note: US TROOPS left after 9-11 - showing that terrorism 'works'.)

Let's look at who supports Israel unconditionally. Let's look at who dabbled in 1953 in internal Iranian politics which eventually led to the Embassy seizure. Let's look at the politics and timing surrounding their release. Let's look at who put US troops in Saudi Arabia and who pulled them out.

Let's look on whose watch 9-11 occurred.

Let's look at, according to the Terrorism Czar Richard Clarke - who ignored signs that 9-11 was to occur.

Republicans.

Nuff said.
 
January 20, 2007
Votes: +0

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 

adsense

Top