Home     Writers     Op/Ed     Book Reviews     News     Bookstore     Photoshops     Submit     Search     Contact Us     Advertise  
  You are here: 





Litvinenko And Limonov
Monday, 27 November 2006 20:31
by John Weaver

Since every British tabloid has linked the dissident Litvinenko with Politkovskaya, let’s link on...

As it happens, both Litvinenko and Politkovskaya were virtually unknown in Russia. You won’t find a copy of their ’sensational’ books anywhere here - nor in the Russian language, that anyone can read.

Their combined threat to the Kremlin didn’t add up to the square root of squilch.

All this will come as a shock to Daily Telegraph readers, but there isn’t really a lot of call for ‘fierce critics of Putin’ these days. Putin has a popularity rating of 79% at the last count.

Given Tony Blair’s 22% at the last council elections, one might well ask which country’s citizens are being forced to live under an unpopular regime.

Known and very popular cialis coupon which gives all the chance to receive a discount for a preparation which has to be available and exactly cialis coupons has been found in the distant room of this big house about which wood-grouses in the houses tell.


Of course, Putin has his detractors. But what do real ‘heroic’ critics of Putin do? Well, on the whole they stay in Russia and protest in Russian, where they can be heard. Not a lot of point otherwise, is there? So you have to ask why they haven’t all been poisoned. Or - much better question - why Lord Bell’s PR firm has never espoused a single one of their worthy causes.

Probably the most courageous Russian dissident of recent times is Eduard Limonov. Who? That’s the whole point. In 2001, the acclaimed but greying, 50 year old writer was jailed on the most bizarre charge of raising an army to march on Kazakhstan. It didn’t merit a Western column inch. Ask Mark Ames of the Exile:

The Western media, so pious in its defense of Russian dissidents who share their liberal values, ditched all pretense of ‘defending to the death’ those with whom they disagree. In Limonov’s case, they suspended their liberalism and kept a conspiracy of silence.
Unlike Litvinenko, Limonov wasn’t writing propaganda to order for Western consumption. He was a nationalist who - though unbelievable to Daily Telegraph readers - actually liked Russia. Oh, and he was also penniless. So when he was slammed in Lefortovo as a dissident, no Pottinger PR hack was paid to write about ‘beating wings taking him away‘. He just got beaten up and taken away, end of story.

But all this was just a few short years ago. Remember? A weakened Russia’s assets were up for grabs. Britain’s City yuppies were set to plunder Russian banking and Shell and BP would corner the oil and gas. Under Yeltsin and the mobsters, it was like taking candy from a baby. So, note to editors - don’t embarrass our new friends.

By 2003, Mark Ames had spent a lonely two years on a ‘Free Limonov’ campaign and no one wanted to know - not even Amnesty International. (I should know, I wrote to them personally without reply.) Incredibly, not even the French Government wanted to comment, even though Limonov held French citizenship. Mark noted that, if it had happened during the Cold War proper, a dissident writer like Limonov would have been given a Nobel Prize, just to say ‘fuck you CCCP’. But now there were big bucks to be made by the West so Mark hit a brick wall. Dissidents dissing Russia not wanted. ‘This story is all a bit fringe‘ he was told.

My my how times change. Now again we see those evil, energy hogging Russkies for what they are. And suddenly, dissidents are right back in media fashion.

Today, UK’s Labour Minister Peter Hain joined the chorus of Telegraph readers and declared that the ‘murky murder cast a shadow over Putin’. Moralising Peter Hain, by the way, just happens to be one of our Labour Ministers who refused to condemn Guantanamo Bay.

On second thoughts, maybe Litvinenko should get a Nobel Prize. He doesn’t deserve one as much as a real dissident writer like Limonov. But Sasha’s affair has exposed the hype and hypocrisy of the British media establishment like nothing else.


More from this author:
Mafia Hit On The Media (16287 Hits)
by John Weaver If I simply stood anywhere near Boris Berezovsky, I’m sure my hair would fall out and my skin would turn yellow. ...
Saint Sasha, The Toenail Puller (12148 Hits)
by John Weaver Tributes to Sasha Litvinenko, the sob story spy, are on all the tear-stained pages of the UK tabloids today. Probably the...
Get Putin (8289 Hits)
From Erinys website. Kalashnikovs for sale or rent. As Beatroot notes, the crescendo of Russophobia has climaxed into the international press...
The Spy Who Nuked Me (6705 Hits)
by Copy Dude Suddenly the whole Litvinenko business is looking more like Austin Powers than James Bond. Aha. ‘The Trail of Poison Leads...
Fruitcake Nukes - Polonium 210 (20355 Hits)
by Copydude  Since bloggers discovered that Polonium 210 could be bought on the Internet, one of the on-line isotope stores took down...
Related Articles:
Pale Fire and London Fog: Illuminating Outliers in the Death of Alexander Litvinenko (10141 Hits)
by Chris Floyd This is an updated version of the piece that appeared yesterday at Truthout.org. I. The Baron and the Billionaire ...
Pale Fire and London Fog: Illuminating Outliers in the Death of Alexander Litvinenko (9654 Hits)
  by Chris Floyd I. The Baron and the Billionaire Everyone knows that Russian exile Alexander Litvinenko was killed by...
Dizzy with Spin - The Berezovsky and Litvinenko Dance Continues (7009 Hits)
by copydude Last time out, I detailed some fairly logical reasons why Polonium is a poor choice as a murder weapon. Not the least of...
Another Litvinenko Cluedo (7593 Hits)
by Copydude An interesting walk-on part in the Litvinenko drama is that of Andrei Sidelnikov. So far, he has made few column inches. In...
Litvinenko And Scaramella. Or Should That Read ‘Scammerama’? (6782 Hits)
by Copydude What a great double act! Litvinenko and Scaramella were a match made in heaven. Mario, the consummate conman, meets Sasha,...

Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Comments (7)add comment

Rosa Luxemburg said:

So Politkovskaya didn't like Russia, and didn't stay there, and didn't write in Russian? She was just writing propaganda to order for western consumption? You guys have a pretty warped view.
November 28, 2006
Votes: +0

Copy Dude said:

Copy Dude
Try this line again:

Unlike Litvinenko, Limonov wasn’t writing propaganda to order for Western consumption.
November 28, 2006 | url
Votes: +0

Jimmy Montague said:

Explain yourselves, please
Luxemburg and copydude should explain their remarks, so those of us who don't swim in Russian language and literature could know what they're driving at.
November 28, 2006 | url
Votes: +0

FH said:

Oh - she's just telling him he's talking almost total nonsense, that Politkovskaya lived in Russia, wrote in Russian and was one of Russia's most respected journalists -- ie NOT "virtually unknown in Russia," as copydude would have you believe. Copydude would also like you believe that Eduard Limonov is...well...never mind...look here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eduard_Limonov . The word fascist springs to mind.
November 28, 2006
Votes: +0

Copy Dude said:

Copy Dude
Limonov's politics are not material. The point is that Limonov was a dissident - doesn't matter what kind - when dissidents were not championed by a hypocritical Western media. It didn't suit them at the time.

Western media wouldn't care what spots Limonov (or Politkovskaya) had if it made useful propaganda. As is proven by the elevation to martyrdom status of the highly dubious dirty trickster, Litvinenko.

You can dispute the relative obscurity of Politkovskaya in Russia if you wish to pick on a tangent to rubbish the article - and perhaps you want to provide a link in support of your argument, as I do. But Novaya Gazeta is hardly Cosmopolitan, while publishing books outside the country, in a foreign language, is hardly recipe for local popularity.
November 29, 2006 | url
Votes: +0

wennington blues said:

When remarking on tabloids and then naming the Telgraph, one should be careful not to mix the two...
Furthermore, one might want to have a look at the BBC website, well-known to be perhaps the most neutral media medium in the world before assuming that the British media is in fact mixing and changing the facts on a daily basis hmm? there seems to be som much talk about the Telegraph. i wonder whether one reads anything else?
November 30, 2006
Votes: +0

Copy Dude said:

Copy Dude
he BBC website, well-known to be perhaps the most neutral media medium in the world

You mean the Biased Broadcasting Corporation or the Blair Broadcasting Corporation? On the contrary, you might like to check the neutral Medialens Organisation website, where the BBC is the focus of the majority of complaints.
November 30, 2006 | url
Votes: +0

Write comment
smaller | bigger



Top 123