Home     Writers     Op/Ed     Book Reviews     News     Bookstore     Photoshops     Submit     Search     Contact Us     Advertise  
  You are here: 





NeoCons Go Ballistic on Iran NIE
Friday, 07 December 2007 00:38
by Larry C. Johnson

“How can you trust the intelligence community to get it right on Iran? They got Iraq wrong in 2002 and now this?” The “this” is the NIE on Iran and its search for nukes.
That in a nutshell is one of the prevalent reactions of neocons and Bush true believers. But wait, there is more. John Bolton told Wolf Blitzer that the NIE was the handiwork of exiled State Department officials hell bent on undermining Bush and this country.
Well, I think it’s potentially wrong. But I would also say many of the people who wrote this are former State Department employees who, during their career at the State Department, never gave much attention to the threat of the Iranian program. Now they are writing as members of the intelligence community, the same opinions that they have had four and five years ago.

Known and very popular cialis coupon which gives all the chance to receive a discount for a preparation which has to be available and exactly cialis coupons has been found in the distant room of this big house about which wood-grouses in the houses tell.

This is one of the neocon talking points. Check out the ravings of Norman Podhoretz, a senior statesman of the neocons. The Pod Man wrote:
I must confess to suspecting that the intelligence community, having been excoriated for supporting the then universal belief that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction, is now bending over backward to counter what has up to now been a similarly universal view (including as is evident from the 2005 NIE, within the intelligence community itself) that Iran is hell-bent on developing nuclear weapons. I also suspect that, having been excoriated as well for minimizing the time it would take Saddam to add nuclear weapons to his arsenal, the intelligence community is now bending over backward to maximize the time it will take Iran to reach the same goal.

But I entertain an even darker suspicion. It is that the intelligence community, which has for some years now been leaking material calculated to undermine George W. Bush, is doing it again. This time the purpose is to head off the possibility that the President may order air strikes on the Iranian nuclear installations. As the intelligence community must know, if he were to do so, it would be as a last resort, only after it had become undeniable that neither negotiations nor sanctions could prevent Iran from getting the bomb, and only after being convinced that it was very close to succeeding. How better, then, to stop Bush in his tracks than by telling him and the world that such pressures have already been effective and that keeping them up could well bring about “a halt to Iran’s entire nuclear weapons program”—especially if the negotiations and sanctions were combined with a goodly dose of appeasement or, in the NIE’s own euphemistic formulation, “with opportunities for Iran to achieve its security, prestige, and goals for regional influence in other ways.”
This blog was one of the first to report that the NIE was being delayed for political reasons. George Bush tried his moron act again today (i.e., “I didn’t find out about this until last week.”) but this time the turd ain’t floating. The news that Iran ended its nuclear program in 2003 was briefed to George Bush in the Presidential Daily Brief. He has known about this, I am told, for at least one year. George Bush is lying when he insists he had no inkling, until last week, that the intelligence community believed Iran halted its nuke program in 2003.

This is the kind of earthshaking intel that analysts rarely get to see. What is remarkable about the NIE is the consensus in the intelligence community about the validity of this info. Compare this to the execrable 2002 NIE on Iraq. There was no consensus in the intelligence community about Iraq’s efforts to acquire nukes. The”true believers” held the day and their position was prominently featured in the final draft. Dissenters–State’s Intelligence and Research Bureau and the Department of Energy–were relegated to footnotes and comments separated from the claim.

When you do an NIE it is incumbent on the writers to clearly state whether there is consensus or dissent. And if there is disagreement then that should be reflected in the text. In the case of the October 2002 abortion, the NIC editors should have noted that there was disagreement in the intelligence community about Iraq’s efforts to rebuild its nuclear program. They should have written something like, “analysts at the CIA and DIA believe Saddam is trying but analysts at INR and DOE believe the evidence points to non-nuclear activity”.  Instead, the NIC editors let stand the misleading notion that Iraq was rebuilding a nuclear weapons program even though all agreed that Iraq was not trying to acquire yellowcake uranium from Niger.  The senior NIC officials failed to do their duty in 2002.

Not the case today. The NIC stepped up and refused to budge despite repeated efforts by Dick Cheney and his minions to gut the effort. This happened thanks to the convergence of several factors. First, most of the Bush neocon ideologues are gone–Wolfowitz, Feith, Bolton, Wurmser, Libby, etc. Second, the Democrats control the House and Senate Intelligence committee and were receiving reports from analysts about the bullying by Cheney and others who were trying to sandbag the conclusions. Third, senior intelligence officers learned the lesson of 2002 and returned to the tradition of telling the President the truth, no matter how unpopular or unpalatable. And finally, this Administration’s days are numbered and the analysts can read the tea leaves. They know there is no percentage in pandering to power by serving up half-truths and wishful thinking.

But let’s not celebrate too strongly. It is clear from the Bush presser today that he is not backing off an inch from his delusion about the Iranians and his commitment to do something about them. Fortunately, the release of this NIE hems him in a bit and limits his options for using military force. It also reminds the American people that serious threats can be resolved with diplomacy rather than rely on testosterone laden military fantasies. If political pressure can keep Iran from building nukes then that is the course we should pursue above all others. Eat that one Mr. Podhoretz.
More from this author:
Gee Whiz, Iran Training Militia, Who Knew? (9400 Hits)
by Larry C Johnson Well, the New York Times just got sucked in again to help the Bush Administration make the case for starting a war with...
Swearing on the Quran? (7976 Hits)
by Larry C Johnson Normally I ignore religious controversy, but the latest flap surrounding incoming Democratic Congressman Keith Ellison, a...
A Soldier's Story - MAJOR BILL EDMONDS (10254 Hits)
by MAJOR BILL EDMONDS [Note from Larry Johnson:  A CIA buddy forwarded this article.  It is a must read.  It is consistent...
The Iraq Catch-22 (7577 Hits)
by Larry C Johnson Regardless of your feelings or beliefs about sending more U.S troops to Iraq, you must accept the painful truth that...
Three Must Reads (6542 Hits)
 by Larry C Johnson The mainstream media has finally caught up and fleshed out some important issues regarding Iraq that I wrote about on...
Related Articles:
Nukes: Iran and North Korea are not the problem (17603 Hits)
by Mickey Z. Thanks to the nuclear aspirations of North Korea and Iran, there's no shortage of rhetoric along these lines: "We can't let...
Iran turns up the Heat (8706 Hits)
by Mike Whitney By now, anyone with a lick of sense can see that the war in Iraq has been a dead-loss. Still, few people understand how it...
Gee Whiz, Iran Training Militia, Who Knew? (9400 Hits)
by Larry C Johnson Well, the New York Times just got sucked in again to help the Bush Administration make the case for starting a war with...
Just Like with Torture, Cheney's Got His Teeth Sunk into Iran (7128 Hits)
by Russ Wellen So much creative destruction, so little time. First the Republicans lost their majority status in Congress. Then the Iraq...
Marching to Persia: First Blows Struck in Bush's War on Iran (7722 Hits)
by Chris Floyd  Hard on the heels of Bush's bellicose language against Iran in his "New Way Forward" speech comes news that...

Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Comments (8)add comment

banjobailey said:

Neocons go ballistic
You are right, on many points, but especially the one about Bush not backing off
one bit. The Intel Community may be just a bit angry about having one of their
own exposed and, further, being cuckolded in Iraq.
That being said, since Bush only used Intel to support his own foreordained
decisions, this may simply be a speed bump on his way to Iran and another war.
We are not out of the woods by a long shot.
December 06, 2007
Votes: +0

Mayfly said:

Right, banjobailey. Any small country with oil is in danger of being mugged by this crowd.
December 07, 2007
Votes: +0

Shirley kittrell said:

I knew this when they went into Iraq....why is is
such a surprise to anyone. Bush wanted to be able
to control all of the oil rich countries....Iraq, Iran and Korea....sorry...booby...you have been caught!!
December 07, 2007
Votes: +0

Emilio said:

These people are apparently on a course to self-inflicted extinction, and much like the murder suicide types, they are determined to take the rest of us down with them.
December 07, 2007
Votes: +0

George Grover said:

Paul Wolfowitz comes to Washington for another position, General Betrayus makes those FAKE CLAIMS of success in Baghdad, by putting up nothing more than 10 foot high Jersey barriers, sect by sect and seperating neighborhoods, all the while LITTLE KING GEORGEE continues spreading misinformation about Iran. By the way, does anyone truely believe that some of the best minds couldn't figure it out to install those barriers for approximately 5 years to slow to a crawl the CIVIL WAR that will eventually take off in VIVID LIVING COLOR after this administration pulls our forces back so the Iraqi government can supposedly run their own country. I say ISRAEL and AMERICA START RUNNING SORTIES ON CHRISTMAS DAY OF 2007. THIS MADDNESS MUST CEASE. TRUELY THE ONE QUESTION I WOULD ASK ALL OF THOSE IN CONGRESS IS, HASN'T ANYONE IN CONGRESS READ THE DOCUMENT THEY ALL STOOD AND TOOK AN OATH TO PROTECT AND DEFEND?
December 07, 2007
Votes: +0

Underground Pirate said:

Blame wars on Americans
The brainless, fat, consumptive American public allowed their democracy to be replaced by corporate fascism. The Iraq war and the inevitable Iran war and the ones following are their responsibility. Blaming it on Bush is a total cop out. Americans love to support the hired killers (a.k.a. the troops) to go abroad and kill people to secure natural resources to help them further warm the globe and make it uninhabitable for everyone. America is a big mistake!
December 07, 2007
Votes: +0

Krashkopf said:

"Impeach. Prosecute. SAVE AMERICA!" - Naomi Wolf
First of all, WHY was it WRONG for Move On to question General Petreaus'independence, but NOT WRONG for John Bolton to impune the entire Intelligence community?

Secondly, IF members of the Intelligence Community DID intentionally release the NIE for the EXPRESS PURPOSE of preventing Bush and Cheney from stampeding the nation into another disasterous, completely unnecessary, preemptive war of aggression . . . I think they all deserve the CONGRESSIONAL MEDAL OF HONOR!

The Founding Fathers, in their infinite wisdom, left us with a Constitutional tools we would need to remove depots like Bush and Cheney from office. That tool is called "IMPEACHMENT" and it is time for Congress to use it!

As Naomi Wolf says:

"Impeach. Prosecute. SAVE AMERICA!"

December 07, 2007
Votes: +0

David Wilson said:

Podhoretz is Zionist mouthpiece.
December 09, 2007
Votes: +0

Write comment
smaller | bigger



Top 123