Home     Writers     Op/Ed     Book Reviews     News     Bookstore     Photoshops     Submit     Search     Contact Us     Advertise  
  You are here: 

Thu

04

Oct

2007

Tell the Senate to Pass the Federal Shield Law
Thursday, 04 October 2007 19:42
by Jayne Lyun Stahl

The U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee will be meeting this week to decide on the fate of the Free Flow of Information Act of 2007, HR 2102, SB 1267 which will guarantee immunity from prosecution to journalists who refuse to compromise the confidentiality of their sources in federal court proceedings. This is an essential piece of legislation, and one that must not get lost in the shuffle of breaking news, or the noose of government control over the press and the media will be allowed to tighten exponentially.

While 49 states now have shield laws which affirm that communications between reporters and their sources are as privileged as those of attorneys and their clients, this protection applies only to state, and local cases, not federal cases. (SPJ). Passage of this bill will prevent any federal prosecutor from bringing a journalist before a grand jury again, and coercing him, or her reveal the identity, or confidential information given him by his source. Passage of this bill will preclude any federal judge from holding in contempt, and issuing jail time, to a reporter who refuses to compromise the confidentiality of their source..

This legislation clearly stipulates that a journalist can only be forced to give up their source under rigorous, and extreme conditions such as if the court considers it necessary in order to "prevent imminent and actual harm to national security," or "imminent death or significant bodily harm."

What's more, anyone who is involved with the "gathering, preparing, collecting, photographing, recording, writing, editing, reporting or publishing of news and information for dissemination to the public" will be considered a "journalist," and will be shielded from prosecution for refusing to comply with a federal court's demand for naming names, or supplying documents.too.

As you know, the past seven years has seen an unprecedented number of freedom of information act requests. Clearly, the only way we have been able to unearth what this administration has been up to has been through the use of FOIA. Ironically, though, the Bush regime, which has distinguished itself by its unparalled, and continuous withholding of information, documents, testimony, in defiance of congressional subpoenas, as well as its willful, and arrogant, destruction of millions of White House e-mails, has hauled more reporters before grand juries, and placed them behind bars for refusing to violate their professional guidelines than any administration before it.

At a time when a record number of journalists have been killed, 75 last year alone making 2006 the deadliest year for journalists on record, we must urge the Senate to pass this federal shield law to not merely to empower reporters, and a free press, but to empower us, to give us back the truth of our elections and our wars..

Nearly one year ago to the day, half a world away, distinguished Russian investigative reporter Anna Politkovskaya was gunned down in her elevator, after having written a scathing expose of torture, and prisoner abuse by her government in Chechnya. We are no closer to knowing who killed her today. And, right here in our own backyard, celebrated Oakland Post editor, Chauncey Bailey, was brutally slain only feet away from his office. It's alleged that his killing had to do with his investigation of a black Muslim splinter group. It is unacceptable in a free society, in any society free or otherwise, in anything that remotely resembles "civilization," however uncivil, that a reporter should be savagely sacrified in the name of perpetuating silence, or a culture of blindness, one that thrives in secrecy and denial.

That Richard Nixon would never have been forced to resign, in disgrace, over Watergate had it not been for the tireless work of two intrepid Washington Post reporters, Woodward and Bernstein, is widely known. That these reporters would never have heard a peep from anything Deep Throat were they not able to guarantee him, and other sources, that their identities, and whatever information they divulged, would be held in strictest confidence.

What better way to pay tribute to a tragically murdered journalist, in Russia, than by restoring dignity to a profession that has increasingly come under fire, and under manipulation by a government not unlike that of Vladimir Putin's, one that has repeated demonstrated how it would like to stifle not merely dissent, but the free flow of information.

It's up to us to ensure that the legacy of the 43rd president of the United States isn't death of the First Amendment by strangulation. He took an oath to uphold the Constitution, not to dismember it. Contact your Senators now, and urge them to provide a federal shield for those who, i in the tradition of the Japanese reporter shot dead in Burma, in their last moments on earth, are still taking photographs so that generations from now, people will know what really happened there. Urge your Senator to pass this legislation because the truth to you is that important,
More from this author:
Following in the Footsteps... (6326 Hits)
by Jayne Lyn Stahl The manic warriors, in Washington, are at it again, only now they've found someone who can manage more than one syllable at...
Worldwide Open Season on the Press (9393 Hits)
by Jayne Lyn Stahl On an otherwise quiet street in Istanbul, this morning, a 53 year old Turkish citizen of Armenian descent was gunned down...
On Hillary's announcement... (5469 Hits)
by Jayne Lyn Stahl You may have read the transcript of a speech given by George McGovern in The Nation last week in which he rightly...
An Open Letter to "The Decider" (5833 Hits)
by Jayne Lyn Stahl While the odds are probably better of getting a response from Santa, there are a few things I'd like to say if you can...
"Notes from the Undergrown: State of the Oilman Address" (5808 Hits)
by Jayne Lyn Stahl The president's speech last night was more important for what it didn't say than for what it did. In an address that could...
Related Articles:
Democratic Control of the Senate is a Double-Edged Sword (6407 Hits)
by Dave Lindorff Let’s stop all the heavy breathing. While Republican vultures hover shamelessly over the hospital where Sen. Tim...
Truth Exposed by Senate Armed Services HearingTruth Exposed by Senate Armed Services Hearing (4241 Hits)
by David Swanson The Senate Armed Services Committee held a hearing today at which the Inspector General of the Pentagon, Thomas Gimble,...
What John McCain Didn't Tell You (4388 Hits)
by Larry C Johnson While John McCain was excoriating the press in Baghdad yesterday for not presenting the "full story" about how...
TELL ME WILLIAM DONOHUE, WOULD A VANILLA JESUS DO? THE REAL TRUTH ABOUT CHOCOLATE JESUS (5867 Hits)
by Linda Milazzo Once in a while I see Norman Lear. Not surprising. In Los Angeles' progressive community it's bound to happen. Eerie...
Vermont Senate approves impeachment resolution (6906 Hits)
MONTPELIER -- The Vermont Senate voted 16-9 this morning to urge the state's congressional delegation to initiate impeachment proceedings against...


Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Trackback(0)
Comments (1)add comment

Amazed said:

0
All journalists must be saints!
To read this all journalists must be saints! None of them could ever be inventing their own news, staging photos or in general doing whatever it takes to make headlines and MONEY. In your other articles you would open every member of public service up to all the criminal and civil liabilities the world can dream up. But journalists are "SPECIAL", they need lots of protection.
 
October 27, 2007
Votes: +0

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 

adsense

Top