Home     Writers     Op/Ed     Book Reviews     News     Bookstore     Photoshops     Submit     Search     Contact Us     Advertise  
  You are here: 





Independence Day Hypocrisy
Tuesday, 03 July 2007 09:51
by Stephen Lendman

Along with Christmas, no federal holiday is more celebrated than the day a new nation declared its independence from the British Crown on July 4, 1776. Coming in the summer with good weather across the country, it's a day or long weekend of parades, outings, various other celebratory events, and baseball at all levels that many years ago often meant major league "double-headers" that was a big occasion for young boys, like this writer, growing up in "big league" cities whose dads took them out for an endless day at the ballpark. It's also a day commemorating the nation's history, liberation and traditions most people don't know or forgot. That's just as well because they were never taught the truths about them, just the acceptable illusions learned in school to the highest levels. They're extolled by the dominant media, most in academia, and by the clergy and others in high places as well who are willing to spread acceptable myths for the status and benefits doing it affords them.

Young people are never taught our real history, only what's falsely portrayed about it with all ugly parts suppressed. It's to program their minds and train a new generation of "good citizens" to believe what serves the privileged best benefits everyone and assure they won't resist to keep it that way. So we're taught to accept the myth of America's exceptionalism, our special nature, goodness, and democratic way of life, in the best of all possible countries with the best of all possible leaders running a government of, for and by the people serving everyone. If only it were true.

Known and very popular cialis coupon which gives all the chance to receive a discount for a preparation which has to be available and exactly cialis coupons has been found in the distant room of this big house about which wood-grouses in the houses tell.

We're also taught to commemorate our Founders' glorious achievements and their liberating Revolution from the repressive British Crown and aristocracy. They replaced it with an experimental system of government never tried before in the West outside its imperfect earlier form in ancient Athens for a few decades only. After the war of independence, the Founders met in 1787, in the same Philadelphia State House where the Declaration of Independence was signed 11 years earlier. They came to frame a Constitution they hoped would last into "remote futurity" - for their interests alone.

Yet, they managed to include unimaginable freedoms in it as well, including real democratic ones in the Bill of Rights, ratified in 1791. It gave people the rights of free expression, religion, peaceable assembly, protection from illegal searches and seizures, due process and more. We still have them, but, in the age of George Bush, they hang by a thread and can be revoked by a "unitary" executive authority in the name of national security if he says so.

Noted political scientist and social critic Michael Parenti wrote of our Founder's achievement in the 8th and earlier editions of his important book, "Democracy for the Few." In it, he states "the Constitution was consciously designed as a conservative document" with provisions in it, or omitted by intent, to "resist the pressure of popular tides" and protect "a rising bourgeoisie('s)" freedom to "invest, speculate, trade, and accumulate wealth" the way things work for capital interests today. It was to codify in law what politician, founding father, jurist and nation's first Chief Supreme Court justice, John Jay, said the way things should be - that "The people who own the country ought to run it (for their benefit alone)."

Benjamin Franklin was reportedly asked at the end of the Constitutional Convention whether the 55 attending delegates created a monarchy or republic. He responded "A republic, if you can keep it" without acknowledging notions of an egalitarian nation were stillborn at its birth. It was true then and now in spite of all the pretense contrived to portray an idealized society, in fact, always out of reach for most in it. Republican America was created as a nominal democracy Adam Smith said should be "instituted for the defense of the rich against the poor."

The nation's founders achieved mightily handing down their legacy to succeeding generations of leaders always mindful of who gave them power and who they were there to serve. At the nation's birth, only adult white male property owners could vote; blacks were commodities, not people; and women were childbearing and homemaking appendages of their husbands.

Religious prerequisites existed until 1810, and all adult white males couldn't vote until property and tax requirements were dropped in 1850. States elected senators until the 17th amendment in 1913 gave citizen voters that right, and Native Americans had no franchise in their own land until the 1924 Indian Citizenship Act gave them back what no one had the right to take away in the first place. Women's suffrage wasn't achieved until the 19th Amendment passed in 1920 after nearly 100 years of struggling for it.

The 1865 13th Amendment freed black slaves, the 1870 15th Amendment gave them the right to vote, but it wasn't until passage of the landmark Civil and Voting Rights Acts in the mid-1960s, abolishing Southern Jim Crow laws, that blacks could vote, in fact, like the Constitution said they could decades earlier. Today those rights are gravely weakened for all through unfair laws still in force and a nation growing more repressive and less responsive to the needs of ordinary working people and the nation's least advantaged. The limited high-water mark of Lyndon Johnson's Great Society has steadily eroded since in loss of civil liberties and essential social benefits. It's hardly a reason for those harmed and people of conscience to celebrate July 4 or any other day commemorating a nation unresponsive to them and most others.

The nation's Native Indians have the least to celebrate. Few once remained of the 100 million or so throughout the Americas and around 18 million in our America. Long before the nation was liberated from the British Crown, white settlers began slaughtering them mercilessly. Our Native peoples lived peacefully on these lands for thousands of years. They developed proud cultures "Western civilization" began eroding when it arrived.

When the first European settlers came in the late 15th century, Native peoples helped them adjust to a hostile unfamiliar new land. They weren't repaid kindly in our great push West and South that exterminated millions of them given no rights or quarter in our grand "democratic" experiment excluding them. Survivors today enjoy few freedoms only gotten grudgingly, and most suffer severe repression and deprivation in a land they once thrived on.

Today, our original inhabitants live in more desperate poverty and despair than any others in the nation. Their needs are shamelessly unaddressed and virtually ignored. No day honors them for what they sacrificed for the privileged few to enjoy alone. For them, justice long delayed is justice never gotten.

They have no reason to commemorate the nation's founding that cost them their rights and destroyed their proud heritage, culture and lives. Today, their traditions aren't taught in schools and are unknown by the public. They're ignored by the dominant media that mocks and demonizes them in films and society as drunks, beasts, primitives and savages, noble or otherwise. Their legacy is one of made and broken treaties, stolen lands, rights denied, welfare ignored and lives taken for 500 years. They're still repressed and denied in a shameful attempt to "Americanize" them against their will and destroy their proud cultures doing it.

Many others in the nation have no reason to celebrate either on this or any other day. It's truer than ever in an age of extreme greed, unprecedented wealth disparity, loss of civil liberties and essential social services, a state of permanent imperial wars of aggression, galling corruption, and virtual abandonment of the rule of law by a government complicit in all its branches serving the privileged alone. Through lies, deceit and imperial arrogance, they created conditions hostile to the rights of ordinary people everywhere.

They ignore the needs of millions in the country enjoying few of the fruits available to a shrinking number of people in the "land of opportunity" offering less of it to growing numbers in it. Today tens of millions of poor and deprived, especially those of color, are practically condemned as criminals for their disadvantaged state. Through no fault of their own, they're ignored by a heartless state worshiping wealth and privilege at the expense of those having little or none.

Newly arrived immigrants have little to celebrate either, especially the undocumented and exploited forced here by repressive trade agreements like NAFTA and DR-CAFTA. They destroyed their livelihoods at home enriching corporate giants at the expense of working people where they're in force. Their choice was stay at home and perish or risk coming north to survive in a hostile unwelcoming climate uncaring of their plight and exploiting and persecuting the ones getting here and able to stay.

Muslims as well have little to celebrate, including citizens whose rights are nominally protected by the laws of the land. Instead, their government defiles Islam in the age of George Bush calling its believers "militants," "terrorists" and "Islamofascists" threatening the nation's security because the president says so. Thousands have been illegally hounded in witch-hunt roundups since 9/11, held in secret detention, unjustly deported, and given no rights including due process to clear their names. Their "crime" is their faith and color in a nation nominally guaranteeing all its people can worship freely. That right's now voided for those of the wrong faith. They're demonized, unwanted, condemned and persecuted in "the land of the free" but not for them. Shame on the nation that strayed from its founding principles, never granted to all, still only afforded a chosen few, and now denied anyone designated an enemy of the state even if they aren't one.

Finally, African Americans have little to celebrate this independence day that gave them none at all at first, precious little thereafter, and still treats them as second class citizens at best. They were first commodified and sold into bondage as human property. Their worth and status were then degraded in Article 1, Section 2, Clause 3 of the Constitution. That was the infamous "three-fifths clause" euphemistically referring to slaves as less than people (and Indians as non-people) that remained the law of the land until voided by the 13th Amendment in 1865.

Black Americans are now nominally free, but along with Native Americans suffer the highest rates of poverty, deprivation, and incarceration and get the least amount of government aid for essential social services. That includes decent affordable health care, education and housing and enough food to eat for the poorest and most deprived with single mothers with children most harmed.

This July 4, at holiday outings, picnics, barbecues, ballgames, outdoor concerts, parades, fireworks displays, visits to the shore on vacation, and other celebratory events, remember the growing millions of victimized and deprived Americans in need. The state ignores them, denies them, even condemns them for their plight. Those most desperate are helped the least so the most privileged and well-off can be advantaged the most. As we give thanks and count our blessings this and every day, think of the poor and desperate who have few or none of what we take for granted. Remember, but for the grace of the Almighty, their plight could be ours.

Finally, remember as well on our "day of independence" the many tens of millions worldwide we deprived of theirs. Included are the people of Iraq, Afghanistan, Palestine and every nation living under US-imposed neoliberal unfair free-market rules exploiting the many for the interests of a privileged few. Those harmed range from the southern tip of Chile to the vastness of Africa to the Asian continent and throughout Europe, most notably in the East once under Soviet control. People everywhere pay for our nation putting wealth and power interests above basic humanity.

On this "independence day" and all others, think of them and our own deprived millions at home. Then imagine a future time free of that condition because enough people mobilized to change things bettering everyone. That would be something worth giving thanks for and celebrating.

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.

Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to The Steve Lendman News and Information Hour on TheMicroEffect.com Saturdays at noon US central time.
More from this author:
Threats to Hugo Chavez As Venezuela's December Presidential Election Approaches (16226 Hits)
by Stephen Lendman   On December 3, 2006 voters in Venezuela will again get to choose who'll lead them as President for the next six...
Agitprop Capital of the World (the USA) Exports Its Poison to Venezuela (16037 Hits)
by Stephen Lendman Agitprop, electoral fraud and dirty tricks may not have been invented in the US, but they certainly were perfected in...
A Trial Giving Kangaroos A Bad Name (14247 Hits)
by Stephen Lendman As the dominant corporate media in the US made sure everyone in the country would know just ahead of the mid-term...
New Faces, Same Agenda (15523 Hits)
by Stephen Lendman The political firmament shook briefly post-November 7 raising hopes change would follow the Republican's drubbing at the...
The Price of Imperial Arrogance (11828 Hits)
by Stephen Lendman Lyndon Johnson was a conflicted man about Vietnam almost from the time he took office. As early as May, 1964, he...
Related Articles:
The People's Republic of Me - Novelist Nick Mamatas declares his independence (6676 Hits)
by Mickey Z. I met Nick Mamatas in 1999 when he edited my first book, "Saving Private Power." Nick was (and is) brutally honest and...
Holiday Hypocrisy (6959 Hits)
by Stephen Lendman Borrowing the line from Gilbert & Sullivan's HMS Pinafore: "Things are seldom as they seem, Skim milk ...
by Carolyn Baker Turning and turning in the widening gyre The falcon cannot hear the falconer; Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold; The...
Labor Day Hypocrisy (6279 Hits)
by Stephen Lendman Labor Day is commemorated on the first Monday in September each year since the first one was celebrated in New York in...
Global Hypocrisy on Burma (3649 Hits)
by Satya Sagar As the Burmese military brutally cracks down on a popular uprising of its citizens demanding democracy the question on many...

Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Comments (1)add comment

a guest said:

america is not free but still enslaved to the english race through british infiltration of media, establishment in USA.
How britain got hold on america after american independence-----This all started soon after Napoleonic war when in 1816 to 1817 The english again attacked america in her southern flanks and the day was saved only because of some French navy mercenaries and French speaking population of Louisiana and such states along with non-english origin americans. But the english invaders infiltrated among that population of Southern america which today calls itself bible belt (whose god has always been english royalty and who worship only stolen money).By 1850 to 1860 England attacked erstwhile friend (in Napoleonic war) Russia in Crimea along with erstwhile foe (now controlled by unpopular english stooge) France.-how the same pattern is so predictable in case of this intrusive, cancerous exploitative race called english and anglo saxons. At that very time England was actively supporting the slave exploitation, in fact all the big plantation owners were english derived and they owned loyalty not to flag of United states of america but to England. -in other words they were agents of foreign country who wanted to keep south america occupy as foreign power again. The civil war in america was not only supported with money and arms by england but rather england was the instigator of american civil war in order to keep whole of america enslaved and if not possible at least those parts (South) where it could call upon filial loyalty. It was truly a war of race-not against whites and blacks but against anglo saxons versus blacks, Irish, other European peoples .The same would be repeated in future. The confederacy was a traitor to america-a british agents; but ironically that same confederacy flag today is being propagandised by their descendents as symbol of american independence and patriotism. Having lost the proxy war england resorted to the one thing it specialises-terrorism and misinformation. Abraham Lincoln was murdered by the person very sympathetic to british cause. (against Napoleon england had sent several terrorist squads-that is why Napoleon had to declare Himself an Emperor to maintain the clear line of succession to protect glorious French Revolution). It is very interesting that most of the american presidents assassinated were those whom England did not want being elected. By the end of civil war ,instead of disinfranchasising the british supporters (of southern states) and taking away their land or at least redistributing evenly the stolen land, the american govt. was persuaded by britain to spare them and let those southern traitors keep all the stolen land so that drug (tobacco) and cotton would be of assured supply to england. Of course by that time because of fall of Napoleon (brought about not by military might but by conspiracy to embroil the Europeans among each other( conspiracy hatched in London-that was the only english contribution to napoleons' fall-forget waterloo where Austrians and Prussians had contributed most militarily):consequently england got free reign to exploit the rest of the world and amassed wealth. With that new loot the english shopkeepers started not only factory but also bought titles (Always a purchasable item in england) and started giving themselves high sounding titles and names. With that they started the rumour that english people had class and aristocracy and america could rub some off it if it was willing to ply right and play right. During that period england started propaganda of herself being friend of america though in britain news it hardly gave any importance to americans except with contempt. When the first world war came, england had already infiltrated in the american decision making process.( Though some of southern traitors had fled to Canada, most had remained to slowly spread their cancerous tentacles tn American govt. The first world war had been started by england to destroy Germany and Russia at the same time. England had got envious of germane prosperity (by 1870 Germany without an empire had taken over england in industrial).Encyclopaedia Britannica writes (anyone can verify that) about Bismarck that Bismarck was aggressive in domestic policy but very peaceful in foreign policy because he did not interfere with Others' empire making process. Try telling that to the then French and Austrian peoples. This only shows how the mind of england and anglo saxon race works even today. The same encyclopaedia hardly gives any credit of roman empire to Romans or Italians saying it was an world empire so Italians ((even of Rome) had little to do with. Take all the credit for a bandit cum shopkeeper's empire (british which lasted 100 to 150 years but no credit to Romans for an empire of much better quality and longer duration. anyway during 1st world war the slogan of england was freedom for world from German aggression who wanted to take away world. This was from a shopkeeper's country who had imposed devastating assault on the whole world not only economically and politically but also environmentally. The evil was giving a slogan to be spared! Though the main intention of Germans was against Russia (to which england had secretly given support) on england@s backstabbing Germans took decision to sort out the English as well. With all the resources of empire (men and arms not to speak of money) England could not do anything against Germans who had been embroiled (as was planned by england-Belgium's sovereignty was an excuse) on two fronts. This shows the inferiority of English military power at the height of her power (but then it never won war on strength but through indiscreet looking spies. What Hitler said of Jews was all wrong, it never applied to Jews. Hitler was barking at wrong tree. What Hitler said of Jews applies only to english race and not to anybody else. The Jews in freemasonry are english agents-in freemasonry are many peoples other than Jews. in fact freemasonry is shopkeeper@s race (english) spy machinery as are all the british journalists who are still working-after clearance from british spy service-mm5-as british spy. The Jews got all the blame because their very small fish-main mastermind of international ring to take over world for its own geed use has been england’s and no one else. Anyway ,English army and navy were so ineffective against German might that by 1917 england was loosing the war. Then come the immense pressure to declare war against Germany by america. -in name of democracy. before that democracy word had not been used to defend anything. Now facing defeat england started talking of democracy just as it started talking of democratic reform 99 years after ruling Hong Kong-an year before departure. Democracy from then will mean not what it is supposed to mean in dictionary meaning-but a special kind of system anywhere in the world which protects english interest and which allows england to exploit others race. A very famous news mogul (Jewish) had been stopped from running american presidency because he might not have been inclined to rescue england in the 1st world war. Anyway, the southern constituency was pressing hard for america to come to rescue england who was staring defeat and thus loosing the prospect of enslaved nations who would have been feed from defeat of england. America did come to aid of england and it was called end of isolationalism. But this end of isolationalism would be tolerated only when it suits english interest against others and not in case of others like freedom for Irish people in northern Ireland (an occupied part of Ireland). But american intervention was not decisive-Russian winter was As it would be another war 20 years later. But the pattern had been set-up for america to make her polices to suit english interest not only in domestic policy but also in foreign affairs. IN fact in pursuing such policy America is acting against the home countries of majority of her citizens. But who says in democracy majority rules . Who says in democracy peoples have choice. Democracy as practised and refined by the british media propagandists is any system of government -even by a psychotic like yelstin in Russia-which benefits british business and gives jobs to british people at the same time making pauper and slave ,stooge of english interest. Between the 2 world war, even before the rise of Hitler in Germany the british agents and british sympathisers (who used to keep a photo of queen Victoria in '20s as object of worship) started a terror of murder, killings and what not against not only the blacks but also Catholics. This is how british always operate. first let be it white versus blacks. then whites versus Jews. all one at time otherwise victims will be forewarned and retaliate . then white versus white Catholics. then whites versus white Germans. They do like that in nations they do to peoples.--- only if the people realize that and finish these parasites off once for all! Those very confederacy flag bearers had recruited a lot of other whites to their cause and later on they would attack those whites also whose origin did not look like from england-one by one. Those same racists were the first to pressurise america to join 2nd world war for saving britain. so their racism was and is not for white race but for a shopkeepers’ race derived from Phoenicians (no European) and who the world knows by the name of English and anglo-saxon race. From the 1st day of 2nd world war America secretly supplied arms and supplies. british spitfire and other british arms were low quality useless junks-american plane along with Japanese Mitsubity and German planes were the real weapons of 2nd world war-but then british and anglo saxon media would like you to believe otherwise. Rest we know. With 80 % of German's forces on winter Russian soil, even then Germans were more superior in might and valour then the english who simply were conniving how to embroil others in the war rather than fight themseselves. Israelis in last 50 years have won spectacular victories (without assistance of UNO sanctions agents enemies, unlike some (in 48 war Israelis Massesmitchs plane destroyed RAF plane flown by english( fighter) pilots who dared raid against Israel). Then british threatened Israel with dropping atomic bomb over Israel. But Israelis do not celebrate so much (even 30 anniversary of taking of Western Wall in 67) with military band and show and do the english with their tartly shows of crap british war machine. But main point is why should american sources and effort be directed solely against others for the benefit of England (nor=t even Scotland in recent Scotland limited freedom referendum bbc was vehemently opposed to giving any power other than a token on to install own bus service or erect toilets). After all the population (legal) of united states constitutes more than 69 5 of those who did not come from Britain let alone england. In fact those who are noe-englang derived are the main people who made america great otherwise america would have remained like Canada-the largest country in the world with stole land of immense proportion ad thus benefiting from what comes out of stolen land-oil, timber, grain. Canada constituting mainly of (not French Canada) those peoples who fled states after their forefather’s failed coup attempt to take over united states (and thus relation of low brained confederacy's descendendents ) are british agents and also primary producers of the land (stolen). Canada gross product constitutes very little of what man produces by brain or talent. The same way is of australia and new Zealand. these non-american anglo saxon countries arte third world-in fact their brain power is less than that of third world people. But then as west, as understood by English is really England and her descendents (anglo saxons) these backward countries-culturally and by criteria of per square kilometres’ product. It is exactly what united states was until influx of immigrants from central and southern Europe incidentally came to america with more money than the british. By the way Canada is among the most 4th debted nation in the world but no body likes to expose and discuss it. It is the German scientists (till 1930 language of science was German and not English, it was after German speaking scientists came to america that gradually english( broken) became the language of high science. IT is because of effort of these non-english immigrants that america acquired power of which she is so boastful and which made her powerful. As that intellectual property right of foreign country (rocket making, atomic bomb making ,china crockery, tea even gunpowder from china) was stolen by both america and britain ,without paying royalty (how much british wedge wood or royal Doulton or Lipton tea has paid to china for having stolen china's product and reverse engineering?; it is why this so called GAT pact must be scraped (as it produces rotten british beef in agriculture for once) and other countries should enquire whatever arms they want without giving a damn about anglo saxon world who incidentally dropped one and only one atomic bomb without their security having been jeopardized (that is why they did it-if they know that they will also be annihilated then there will a peace-borne out of fear. the only language anglo saxons understand. Anyway what these non-english immigrates got out of all these contribution? denigrating remarks, patronizing talk, and deliberate attempt to annihilate their identity-they call it mixed bowl. even Einstein has not got a stream in the university town of Princeton.they are called ethnic americans-Italian, Greek, Lithuanian (Who incidentally are the only Aryan race speaker apart from Latin in whole of European peoples and in america).Jewish ,Spanish etc. Implication being they are not really americans but only anglo saxons are ,. Even the Hispanic have been made villain as non americans. AS Spanish were the first to discover america and stay) one third of america is stolen from Spanish Mexicans) and Hispanic are Spanish and some are even half Spanish and half original americans (Called Indians),those Hispanic are the one who have got most right to stay in united states. But they are being labelled black as a sort of derogatory undesirable way. Blacks are the one who contributed most to what is any culture in america.129 years after slavery abolition and 220 years independence, the blacks are not even third class citizen. It is this same america who .in order to harass other nation on one pretext or other ask third world country to improve human right situation, IN fact america and england combined should be prosecuted in a war crime tribunal for crime committed against her citizens( non-england derived) and culprits 'property and all assents confiscated with capital punishments for many of tobacco barons and others pushers of alcohol ,cigarettes and what not. Main point is this england through her control of english proprietorship, and through ufo-seeing morons (english gene plays a role here) have completellty manipulated most of not-british -derived americans people that there is common cause with those parasites first in name of black again white, having won that then they attack whit catholic, Jews, Spanish, Germans and so on but not all at the same time-the game then will be revealed. Most of the english derived peoples are making money in jobs which does not require brain but are primary producers-of land( stolen from others)-timber. forestry, prairie agriculture, oil extraction etc. in other words anybody can do that if they also had that land. it is parasitic living. Unfortunately these land produced goods are what makes most profit (unless it happens to other countries ; product then price will be manipulated to go down to lowest possible level).Because of that parasitic ill-gotten money-which remained in the hand of traitors to united states( because after civil war their land was not confiscated as it should have been) these southern village idiots (bible belt dwellers- eumpherically called middle america) got rich and had undue influence on american policy anglo saxons are low bred Phoenician derived shopkeepers race, it is not surprising that money is their god and exploitation and hatred their motto, and cowardice is their prudence and spying their only means of fighting for a such a coward weaklings. But majority of americans are long that because they do not belong to anglo saxon race. IN fact they are more intelligent and capable than all the anglo saxon morons of the world put together. They must make a think tank to root this evil out. They demand that there is enough talent in america it selves to make Hollywood film and stop the british actor getting any job-the jobs which would have gone to americans. They should give less value to media pumped up british pop musician whose song look like coming from badly split bamboo. And it is through british control media and Hollywood that a positive picture is sought to be given of english shopkeepers (saying that they somehow come from classy background-in fact every Indian and Asian and German who went america came from much superior background -economically, socially, breeding and education than these english lowlifes who end up in Hollywood only because they can speak (they can not write correctly-word processor comes to heir aid) in a low accent-more like fishmonger and most like a corner shop owner. DO we want these low lives from britain? Their visa should be confiscated and they need to apply the for visa the same way as any other people do. and selection criteria should be as stringent as for those from other country. In other words they not only have to pass stringent professional exam but also prove without reasonable doubt that they will be of PhD. material. as for visa casual servants works like au-pair must be stopped. there are a lot of better americans who can do it without killing babies.
All the non-english derived (i.e. non anglo saxon race) race has to come together on this agenda to remove this english race's cancerous infiltration in america and it will be done because that disease does not let you leave in people and happiness. It feeds on others misery. this awareness can completely remove this england parasite from american scene and only then will america be free atlas.
American south confederacy--traitor to Usa
and agents of britain--It is the same class of british loving american traitors who hunted down all free thinking director, producers, actors and artists from Hollywood. They hunted the Jews so much that though Hollywood had been started by the Jews ,the Jews never dared put in Hollywood films anything other than glorifying those southern and western bandits who were of english extraction. the Hollywood became a propaganda and fictional plot to further english interest. The hunting of conscientious artists had been going on before war but after Hitler it intensified. And these same racists did to Jews and other minorities in Hollywood worse than Hitler could do to German film industry. since then Hollywood has become an easy employment place for all sorts of rubbish british star who would get the jobs to the detriment of real american subjects. british are not even grateful to the americans for that. They would propaganda for british films which are equally bad. failing their attempt to pump up british films, they would infiltrate american films including even the alien films where their low accent has no relevance. Then the british propaganda against Hollywood that it is rubbish( though when French will like more European films then they would protest). Hollywood is rubbish not in spite of but because of the presence of british (english) actors and so called british artists. Also Hollywood’s agenda is determined by the british agents for England’s interest. That is why is the Hollywood rubbish-because of english stars' presence. and americans must wrest away this control for themselves rather than leaving Hollywood as means of propaganda and employment for english foreigners.
President Truman( a british agent) used to have keep Victoria’s picture in his childhood sleeping room-no wonder he gave to the british secret( stolen from Germany) of atom bomb. Even president Kennedy( who the english race did like to have been not to be elected) allowed britain (in order to make old man Macmillan happy) have a nuclear submarine which britain called Polaris. Britain has not got an independent nuclear power-it has been given as a charity case by the americans .All because of propaganda and manipulation by british lobby in america. It is the same british lobby who raised the spectra of hordes of Hispanic invasion to america -and it called those Spanish speaking peoples black. For all the non-british peoples in america there is only and only one enemy-england and her agents in america.
Recent bastardly acts of britain since end of so called british sponsored cold war---And start of new world war---These days for last few years a lot of Kurdish refugees( who by the way are more Aryans than all the Europeans combined-though it is irrelevant here) are escaping from Turkey because of Turkish pressure. But nobody has ever stopped Turkey from having her air space nor has anyone bombed turkey. And why should anyone? Who has given right to a handful of countries to be a policeman? Could they dare demand such thing at time of so called cold war? Every December ,ever since gulf war there is a show of bullying tactics by anglo-saxons in middle east. There is really no ground but excuse is created because this race feels uplifted when others are insulated. Also there is a low cost exercise in bullying any other nation by military postures.
How Britain was mouthing venom against Israel in 1981 and ‘82.
Why should Iraq not have weapons as he desires? in 1981, when the Israelis had bombed the Iraqi nuclear reactor (a few days before going critical) it was britain) govt, and british media) who had vehemently opposed Israeli daring action and did a lot of anti-Jewish propaganda. At least Begin had a reason to fear from the Arab enemy of Israel. even in '82 Lebanon war it was britain which was most vociferous in criticizing Israeli military action at the same time minimizing the Israeli Air force’s achievement in destroying Bacca’s valley missiles through high tech method. Read any paper from June 81 till June ‘83 and see how britain -both government and media was anti Israeli and was for Lebanon to be free from Israeli but not Syrian influence-in fact british advocated Syrian interference in Lebanon. And british media (BBC) was very enthusiastic in minimizing the military achievement of Israeli ) in that war) In fact What americans did in gulf war was what Israeli had achieved way back in '82 in Lebanon war and America obtained that military know-how from Israelis after Lebanon war. But gulf war is justifiable on basis of military superiority but not Lebanon war. In fact when an american general said that america learned a lot from Israelis' achievement then the american defence minister Weinberg said that America learned not from Israeli but from British. Of course we all know that Weinberg was (awarded sir) more of a british defence minister than american one. He was pro-british and anti-Jewish (and anti Russian and all others as well). In fact in Lebanon war the american foreign secretary was changed because the british did not like Hague's attitude. This much britain exercises influence in american affairs. Now having installed all the stooges in Arab world britain has discarded her sham veil of Arabists and openly insults( through america of course because on own britain is not even a fourth grade power) the Arab world. Talking about the stooge, have you wondered why these days even Yeltsin's bad health no longer makes any headline news in anglo saxon world? Before any cold that Yeltsin had was noticed and still before that any peon from Russia had a headline news ' material. The reason is simple. Britain has installed in Russia not only a mad man likes yelstin but also a second line of stooge successor to him. After Yelstin usefulness is over then he will be replaced by those second line of british stooge who at the moment are already controlling Russia and destroying her everyday. Democracy ,as understood today, basically means any system which gives free hand to britain to exploit other races. If their is one example of what an evil this so called capitalism is and what a saviour communism (britain does not dislike communism, she dislikes other's prosperity and independence whether it comes from communism, nationalism or what ever) is: this ruinous example of Russia is the real lesson. China is right to hold on to her nationalistic pursuit. It really is a war between anglo-saxons and the rest of the world. It is a race war. Sooner the rest of the world realizes that better it would be and this danger would be sorted out.
CND and amnesty International-british agents for british interests--- You remember that at the height of cold war in mid 80's there was a lot of activities of C.N.D. You would expect that with so called cold war finished, this C.N.D. would be asking to the british peoples to leave the nuclear weapons given to her, out of pity and filial relationship , by the United states. But exactly opposite happened. C.N.D. has been defunct since than. It is as if that was a front of the british govt. to show by way of propaganda that that country had some moral voice. In other words, C.N.D. was a sham created by the british to give them respectability. Of course when a non-anglo saxon country could perfect their nuclear weapon, as France rightly did (in 1995), then there would be a lot of hue and cry by the anglo-saxons' media. France and china are right in strengthening their independent military power. The real danger to world comes from england and her anglo saxons agents. France understand that and Germany was a fool in not supporting France in Nato meeting this Summer. Just as CND has been proved a sham of british propaganda, more so is the sham which goes by the name of amnesty international. It is interesting that as soon Falkland war started, within a few weeks this amnesty international presented a dozier on Argentina. In the same way as soon gulf war started (soon after Iraqi’s intervention in Kuwait) the same amnesty international presented a dozier and report on Iraqi’s atrocities. an fact many of the amnesty allegations were just a copy of what british media was saying and which later on proved to be fabrication and great big lies. But this did not dent the reputation of amnesty international. british propaganda ensured that. IN '88 when Dalai lama, at the height of Tibetan disturbances, visited west, the then british prime minister refused to meet Him. Later on with the demise of Russia and usefulness of China gone and with manipulation to keep power in Hong Kong somehow intact, the same british media and government ,like dog, started barking at China. It is interesting that amnesty international selectively targets those very countries( as it did china after cold war) who are out of favour (because they would not be a british stooge) of the british media and govt. This is not surprising as amnesty international is the creation of british govt, and british media. england with the most appalling record of human rights in last 200 years of her evil rule, needed some organisation to keep the others from charging england off her past and current evil practices. In other words it went for aggressive posture in propaganda war so that others can be demoralized and stopped from pointing out the real evil which is england. That is why amnesty international is one armour of the british lies to exploit the rest of the world. Amnesty international must be ignored and an independent human watchdog (which england will simply ignore) created. One purpose of amnesty international is to create an atmosphere for hatred towards the would be victims of british exploitation so that a victim could be blamed to have deserved the consequences. That is why ,now amnesty international sometimes threatens China, sometimes India and etc. India because India needs to be cowed down and also so that India does not make nuclear weapon and thus feel free from future american (read english and anglo saxon) aggression. This is all to create an atmosphere of misinformation. The other countries are also responsible (out of sheer inferiority complex) for giving these instruments of british propaganda so much importance. If they simply ignore and then the british lies and then themselves go in offensive (they can do it-no problem) against british exploitation and propaganda then those countries would not in such dire strait as they are now. Think, this deterioration has happened in only last 20 years( though the british have been at this game for a long time but they were not always successful when others have been vigilant).Ignoring and fighting all this anglo saxons propaganda, the other races (yes it comes to that) must unite and support each other against this common enemy england. The other nations should also go nuclear and assemble as much arm as possible ,collaborate on it and ignoring this anglo saxon race they must be prepared for war which then would be prevented otherwise it would come inevitably. The other nations need to arm themselves to protect themselves from anglo saxon race. Thinking any other way is simply kidding oneself. And it can be done and will be done.

31st jan.2007.

it is very important to realize and understand the trickery of the english race in manipulating usa to wage wars on behalf of britain which gains most from Iraq war and any war that usa imposes on the third world and even on Europe.

Here are some of the writings done years ago to give a global picture of what is REALLY happening in the world and by WHOSE agency.
The modus operandi of Britain is to make country and regions unstable and install british stooge with explicit instruction to bring the money -looted ones -to Britain from where it is not going to go anywhere else. Britian is running a very large money laundering operation with help of british govt, british companies and british banks along with active collaboration of british liar media.
Some oligarch Jews (like thee criminal U.K.-based fugitive oligarch Boris Berezovsky)
were the stooge of British in Russia and they brought so many ill gotten money to uk. So did the Kuwaitis-who brought 4 billions of pounds within a week of first Iraq war problem in august 1990 -so has continued the massive loot of the rest of the world by the English .race through this money protection racket . It is money protection racket in the sense that those eliete’s money is protected only when it is made to be lodged in British London banks. The witness, who appeared on the Rossiya channel with his face hidden and was referred to as Pyotr, accused 61-year-old Berezovsky of killing Alexander Litvinenko because the former security officer knew how the exiled tycoon had obtained political asylum in Britain in 2003. This thief boris berezosvky is a terrorist as well who calls for violet end to Putin-the president who is one of the most loved of his countrymen compared to any in the world.
As someone said “We live in a world where criminals are good guys and patriots are villains: where Berezovsky is a liberal "human rights" activist and Putin is a moral monster.” that putin who is one of the most popular leader of any in the world.

Mrs Margaret Thatcher, Britain's so called iron Lady, refused to receive the Dalai Lama during his UK visit in the late-1980s for fear of offending his Chinese oppressors. Perhaps the iron in her was wrought iron, much given to bending in the heat.

In fact Britain is running a protection racket in the world through the help of american army-(because Britain is a third rate country with fourth rate army so it cannot do it on its own).
What Britain does is let the other countries be made instable (Kuwait, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan etc) then let the british stooge be installed there-those people who have no following in own country and with strict instruction to those stooges that they will bring the money to britan,-that is how London has enriched itself in last 15 years after fall of soviet union. Billions of soviet money have flown illegally to London and the british court -kangaroo court if ever there was any -have not let the money go citing “it will harm england’s balance of payment”?
That is why british media gets incensed if the traitors like soviet spies are not left safe in Britain -because then the whole business of protection money racket and money that Britain gets is in jeopardy. That is what explains influx of foreign money to London and how London has overtaken new York in stock market. Forget about service industry -british are the most ill mannered race what service can they provide except protection racket on back of american arms? Britain is looting even usa. Through it is usa which has worked hard (through illegal invasions ) to make other countries unstable so that Britain can get money from protection of stooge elites of those countries..
the modus operandi of Britain is to make country and regions unstable and install british stooge with explicit insturction to bring the money -looted ones -to Britain from where it is not going to go anywhere else.
Some oligarch jews were the stooge of British in Russia and they brought so many ill gotten money to uk. So did the kuwaits-who brought 4 billions of pounds within a week of first Iraq war problem in august 1990 -so has continued the massive loot of the rest of the world by the English race through this money protection racket . it is money protection racket in the sense that those elite’s money is protected only when it is made to be lodged in British London banks.

This is how the british and Americans now conduct their battle for "hearts and minds" – by making local satraps so widely and deeply despised that they are totally dependent on their Washington overlords for their sheer physical survival. The real "benchmark" the Iraqis have to display to the Americans' satisfaction is an infinite capacity for obedience.”

“In the aftermath of President Abraham Lincoln's defeat of the London-backed slave-holders' Confederate insurrection, the London-linked New York faction of U.S. finance unleashed a predatory looting of the physical assets of the territory formerly ruled by the defeated Confederacy. That operation, which was described then as "carpetbagging," is a term that pointed to the style of the personal baggage, in which the travelling, locust-like predators carried their personal effects.”

“ When this English edition of Professor Stanislav Menshikov's book has been printed, Russia's President Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin will have delivered his landmark May 10, 2006 "state of the union" address. The President's address will have marked the probable close of what had been the demographically murderous, greatest carpetbagging swindle in history. The carpetbagging which Professor Menshikov's book describes, is the post-1989 looting of the territory of the former Soviet Union, a looting that, in fact, has also been the predatory ruin of most of the East European territory of the Comecon outside Russia then and now.”-from

by Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr.
Here is LaRouche's Preface to the English edition of Professor Stanislav Menshikov's book, The Anatomy of Russian Capitalism. It is dated May 14, 2006.



by Lyndon H. LaRouche, Jr.

March 30, 2007

The first of the points to which I refer: is that a prudent commander must always understand who the real enemy is. The real enemy is often the clever one, the one often disguised as an ally.

So, Bismarck rightly fought a war of defense against the aggression of British puppet Napoleon III, but, rightly opposed, if unsuccessfully, the Prussian monarchy's foolish refusal to end the war at the point of Napoleon III's defeat. The Kaiser's error was in thus committing a fully enraged, future France to play the role of London's puppet in geopolitical warfare, World Wars I and II, against continental Eurasia.

So, Germany's foolish and duped Wilhelm II and the other nephew of Edward VII, Czar Nicholas II, allowed themselves to make war against each other, at the pleasure of a decadent Austro-Hungarian Kaiser, all this in service of London's intention to have Russia and Germany destroy one another, and themselves, in geopolitical World Wars I and II, organized from imperial London. To bring about the calamity called "World War I," the Kaiser himself cleared the way to war with Russia, through dumping the Chancellor Bismarck who was opposed to Germany's being trapped into supporting Habsburg follies in the Balkans.

The second of the two points, is that a prudent commander never permits his enemy to lure him, half-wittingly, into taking ground at a place and time which the adversary has shrewdly chosen for his relative advantage. For example: The only important, true enemy of Iran resides both in London, and, therefore, also, among the London-steered allies of U.S. Vice-President Cheney. Prime Minister Tony Blair's London is also, the actual enemy of the U.S.A. in Southwest Asia. What is now behind Blair is the actual enemy, of us, and of the people of Southwest Asia; Tony Blair's faction is the force either to be defeated, or made peaceful by gentler means.

On these two accounts, President Putin's policy respecting Iran's current response on the issue of Anglo-American efforts to extend the already ongoing general warfare in Southwest Asia, has been prudent, and some Iranian resistance to President Putin's counsel has been a potentially ominous, tactical blunder, the error of overlooking the dynamical character of the relevant, global strategic situation as a whole."


What happened in 1938 in Munich wasn't so much "appeasement" as it was "collusion". One of Adolf's qualities that appealed so much to the West was his fervent anti-communism. Britain, the United States and other Western governments were counting on the Nazis to turn eastward and put an end once and for all to the Bolshevik menace to God, family and capitalism.[11]



An Anglophile to the core, Wilson didn't care about the fate of the Russians. His concern was in keeping German forces split along two fronts. The payoff worked: Russia's provisional prime minister Aleksandr Kerensky kept the Russians involved in the war.

In 1916, Woodrow Wilson was re-elected to the presidency chiefly on the strength of a slogan: "He kept us out of war." By 1917, the peacenik prez was leading the charge against Germany, jailing antiwar activists, and exhorting Americans to fight a "war to end all wars." In 1940, Franklin Delano Roosevelt told the voters: "I have said this before, but I shall say it again and again and again: your boys are not going to be sent into any foreign wars." Behind the scenes, however, he was maneuvering to do just that – and by the end of 1941, we were fighting a two-front war, embracing "Uncle" Joe Stalin as a fellow "anti-fascist," and planning the internment of the Japanese-American population.
July 04, 2007
Votes: +0

Write comment
smaller | bigger



Top 123