Home     Writers     Op/Ed     Book Reviews     News     Bookstore     Photoshops     Submit     Search     Contact Us     Advertise  
  You are here: 

Sun

05

Nov

2006

Neocon Ship Down
Sunday, 05 November 2006 08:03

by Anwaar Hussain

 
Crashing on the rocks of hubris, the ship Neocon is finally going down and small little furry creatures, commonly known as rats but which once acted onboard like Goliaths, are falling over each other in their mad scurry to jump the ship.

The Neocon propped Bush Administration is preparing to cut and run from Iraq. The most convincing sign of this came when it emerged that Bechtel Corp, one of the biggest construction firms in the world, was leaving the country for good with no new contract to continue the job.

As America prepares to slink out of Iraq, leaving behind legions of demons let lose on Iraqi streets and more than half a million corpses, the discredited Neocons too are jumping the ship taking along with them their myopic vision of U.S. foreign policy that they had used to steer not just America but the whole world into perilous waters.

The stampede was started by William F. Buckley, Jr., that diehard conservative and the pied piper for the American establishments. In a February 2006 piece in his Right wing’s mouth piece journal, National Review, he conceded;

"One can't doubt that the American objective in Iraq has failed. … Our mission has failed because Iraqi animosities have proved uncontainable by an invading army of 130,000 Americans."


But the real impetus came from Francis Fukuyama, a diehard Neocon himself, who wrote the fateful obituary on Neocons in his book ‘After the Neocons: America at the Crossroads’ in March of this year. Fukuyama was once at the core of a pro-war cabal that had among its members people like Dick Cheney, Paul Wolfowitz, Robert Kagan, Richard Perle and Bill Kristol.


Fukuyama did a complete U-turn by openly condemning the ideology of the very people that he once supped with. He declared neo-conservatism to have "evolved into something I can no longer support" and that the doctrine, which has demonstrated "the danger of good intentions carried to extremes ... is now in shambles," and needs to be replaced by a more realistic foreign policy. He wanted the Neocon dream to be consigned to the dustbin of history. Those who promoted that dream, he said, are Leninists of a kind:

“They believed that history can be pushed along with the right application of power and will. Leninism was a tragedy in its Bolshevik version and it has returned as farce when practiced by the U.S.”

He warned that history will not look sympathetically on the Iraq war or its consequences;

"…..it seems very unlikely that history will judge either the intervention itself or the ideas animating it kindly. By invading Iraq, the Bush administration created a self-fulfilling prophecy: Iraq has now replaced Afghanistan as a magnet, a training ground and an operational base for jihadist terrorists, with plenty of American targets to shoot at. "

In the face of a looming disaster, however, the stampede is only now getting to a feverish pitch in the Neocons’ pack. Several other high-flying neoconservatives have now turned on George Bush days before the decisive midterm elections, attacking his administration for ineptitude in the handling of Iraq war and questioning the very invasion they were rather helpful in sponsoring.

Just three days before the Tuesday’s battle for the control of congress in which Iraq war is an essential issue, Richard Perle, Kenneth Adelman, Michael Rubin and David Frum have all disavowed their earlier stances on Iraq war, according to early excerpts of an article in Vanity Fair magazine. One recalls that the first two gentlemen were both Pentagon advisers before the war, while Michael Rubin is a former senior official in the Pentagon's Office of Special Plans, and David Frum a former Bush speechwriter.

In an ironic turnabout, Richard Perle, a hawkish member of the influential Defense Policy Board that advised the defense secretary, Donald Rumsfeld, in the run-up to Iraq war, has bluntly condemned the conduct of the war and blamed "dysfunction" in the Bush administration for the present predicament.

"The decisions did not get made that should have been. They didn't get made in a timely fashion, and the differences were argued out endlessly," said Perle. "At the end of the day, you have to hold the president responsible", he twists the knife further.

Asked if he would still have pressed for war knowing what he knows now, Perle said: "I think if I had been Delphic, and had seen where we are today, and people had said, 'Should we go into Iraq?', I think now I probably would have said, 'No, let's consider other strategies for dealing with the thing that concerns us most, which is Saddam supplying weapons of mass destruction to terrorists'."

Kenneth Adelman of the “cakewalk war” fame now says he enormously overestimated the abilities of the Bush team. "I just presumed that what I considered to be the most competent national security team since Truman was indeed going to be competent". "They turned out to be among the most incompetent teams in the postwar era. Not only did each of them, individually, have enormous flaws, but together they were deadly, dysfunctional." Adelman adds.

He too recants his public urging for military action, in light of the administration's performance. "I guess that's what I would have said: that Bush's arguments are absolutely right, but you know what, you just have to put them in the drawer marked 'can't do'. And that's very different from 'let's go'."

Adelman also stated his particular dissatisfaction of Donald Rumsfeld. "I'm crushed by his performance," he said. "Did he change, or were we wrong in the past? Or is it that he was never really challenged before? I don't know. He certainly fooled me." More ominously, Kenneth Adelman said the guiding principle behind neo-conservatism, "the idea of using our power for moral good in the world", had been killed off for a generation at least. After Iraq, he told Vanity Fair, "it's not going to sell".

Likewise, Michael Rubin accused President George Bush of giving up on Iraqi reformers. The president's actions, Rubin said, had been "not much different from what his father did on February 15 1991, when he called the Iraqi people to rise up and then had second thoughts and didn't do anything once they did".

Not to be left behind is David Frum who as a White House speechwriter helped coin the phrase "axis of evil" in 2002. He said failure in Iraq might be inescapable, because "the insurgency has proven it can kill anyone who cooperates, and the United States and its friends have failed to prove that it can protect them". The blame, according to Frum, lies with "failure at the centre", beginning with the president.

As the ship Neocon goes down and the blame game heats up further, not only will we witness further shameless renouncements from more furry creatures emerging from the vaults but also the enormity of the smallness of these pseudo giants whom we had allowed to grow larger than life.

While it is up to the Americans what they want done with these apparitions that blew into smithereens the shrine of American idealism at the altar of their twisted egos, the scribe cannot help but end the piece with a stanza from Rudyard Kipling;

And the end of the fight,

Is a tombstone white,

With the name of the late deceased,

And the epitaph drear,

‘A fool lies here

Who tried to hustle the East’.



Sources :

1.

2. 

More from this author:
Learn to say Please, Mr. President (5166 Hits)
by Anwaar Hussain Mr. President, Now that a thumping smack has been delivered by American voters to the backside of the Empire...
As America Slept (5877 Hits)
by Anwaar Hussain It all happened while America slept. As America slept, airline jets appeared in the azure blue New York Skies some...
No Mr. Buckley, No (4886 Hits)
by Anwaar Hussain, Dear Mr. Buckley, Writing in National Review Online in February 2006, you William F. Buckley Jr. its Editor...
No Honor among Murderers (6739 Hits)
by Anwaar Hussain On Saturday December 30th, at 6:05 Iraq time, in Abu Ghraib prison, Saddam Hussain was executed not for the mass killing of...
The Fall of the Roaming Empire (4802 Hits)
by Anwaar Hussain The American imperial behemoth finally lies panting at the sandaled feet of its nemesis, the ragtag resistance fighters,...
Related Articles:
The Dumbing Down of America (15031 Hits)
Something is amiss in the great nation called America. Ominous sirens warning this reality can be heard emanating loudly through invisible winds...
Sentimental Education: Academia Signs Up for Tracking Down Dissent (9618 Hits)
by Chris Floyd This is my latest piece for Truthout.org. I. Why is the United States government spending millions of dollars to...
Election 2006: Been Down So Long It Looks Like Up To Me (8547 Hits)
by Chris Floyd Ordinarily, the elevation of a gaggle of corporate bagmen, spine-free time-servers and craven accomplices of tyranny and...
The Melbourne Minutes: New Downing Street Memos from Down Under (7689 Hits)
By David Swanson Over a year before the United States launched an endless war on Iraq in what President George W. Bush told Congress was...
Innocents Abroad: US Cracks Down on Guantanamo Detainees, Most of Whom aren't Terrorists (6678 Hits)
by Dave Lindorff The U.S. is holding hundreds of innocent people at its detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Military...


Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Trackback(0)
Comments (2)add comment

Davidco said:

0
Watch them squirm

http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MzgxYzUzYmRlNjhmNzMyNjI2MDM4YmRjNTFhODA4MGQ=
 
November 05, 2006
Votes: +0

Jimmy Montague said:

0
Perle is still lying
The silly sumbitch says: "I think if I had been Delphic, and had seen where we are today, and people had said, 'Should we go into Iraq?', I think now I probably would have said, 'No, let's consider other strategies for dealing with the thing that concerns us most, which is Saddam supplying weapons of mass destruction to terrorists'."

He still can't admit that the whole thing was bullshit. There were no weapons to be concerned about. Don't tell me his oversight isn't deliberate. He's trying to cover the fact that he and his pals were COMPLETELY and UTTERLY WRONG by tossing blame for the whole mess onto George Bush.

This is one of those times when being wrong OUGHT TO BE a crime. If Perle and the others can't be locked up for what they've done, sufficient attention should be called to their mistakes to make them all permanently unemployable in government, in think tanks, and especially in academe. As a group, they are a bunch of smug, paranoid, thuggish, pseudointellectual know-nothings. They are dangerous people and they OUGHT TO BE locked up. Short of that, we should bar them from any sort of power or influence.
 
November 06, 2006 | url
Votes: +0

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 

adsense

Top