Home     Writers     Op/Ed     Book Reviews     News     Bookstore     Photoshops     Submit     Search     Contact Us     Advertise  
  You are here: 

Tue

27

Mar

2007

Open Letter To Katie Couric: You Were Unfair To The Edwards
Tuesday, 27 March 2007 14:15
by Linda Milazzo

I watched your "60 Minutes" interview this evening with Elizabeth and John Edwards. I found you insensitive and judgemental. Particularly toward Senator Edwards, whom you portrayed as uncaring and self-obsessed.

Watch Interview here.
{youtube}TQYSScsqxqM{/youtube}

You were more preoccupied with Elizabeth Edwards' dying, than with her genuine desire to live. You challenged her positivism and vitality. You painted her future as bleak. Why such negativity, Katie? Yes, cancer isn't good news. But your badgering seems suspect. Didn't you hear Elizabeth's response when you suggested she's staring at death? She said, "Aren't we all?"

Didn't you get that, Katie? We ultimately face the same fate. Elizabeth hasn't surrendered. Don't presume that she should.

Many in America know the tragedies you have suffered, Katie. You were a widow much too young. Your loving husband, Jay, lost his battle with colon cancer after a valiant effort to prevail. Your older sister, Emily, succumbed to pancreatic cancer after she similarly fought to prevail.

Your personal tragedies are well documented. As are your triumphs in dealing with them. You bounced back. Of course there will always be pain, but you survived.

In each of your tragedies you had warning. Your husband, Jay, and your sister, Emily, knew of their illnesses in advance of their deaths. Their diagnoses offered no absolutes. No forecast date of death. No guaranteed length of survival. Diagnoses never do. Yet, throughout their illnesses, you lived each day with hope. This was obvious from the way you fought to save Jay. The doctors you saw. The treatments you sought. The research you did. You wouldn't have done that if you didn't have hope.

Why should the Edwards hope less?

During your interview with Elizabeth and John, it was clear you didn't understand them. John and Elizabeth Edwards aren't like you, Katie. Your experiences are night and day. You experienced impending loss. They experienced instant loss. Within seconds they had no son. In an instant they went from two kids to one. Do YOU understand what that means?

Throughout YOUR preoccupation with Elizabeth's potential to die, you overruled her desire to live. YOU screwed up, Katie. You owe her an apology. For Elizabeth, life isn't about losing. It's about winning, and remaining vital. Yet, regardless of the hope Elizabeth foresaw, you foretold disaster.

Your experience with death (known only through your public persona) came with forewarning. But life has NO GUARANTEES, as the Edwards tried hard to tell you. They lost their child at sixteen years old. Loss often comes without warning. ANY leader can lose a loved one in office. Not just through illness. Accidents happen. People die unexpectedly. There are NO guarantees. We can go at anytime. We merely presume that we won't.

The question is, can the person in power survive the loss? Does he or she have the character... the mettle to see it through?  

John Edwards has proven he has it. Elizabeth has proven it, too.

Funny, Katie. You used to be so perky. Tonight you were the picture of gloom. You discouraged positivism. You dissuaded goals. You challenged desire. You shed darkness where the Edwards sought light. Is that really how you view your life? Die before dying? Lose before losing?

You will state you were seeking the truth. Instead you refused to accept it.
More from this author:
Comic Relief, Celebrity and Remembering Little Harry (6702 Hits)
by Linda Milazzo Hooray for Hollywood! Yes, I'm a believer. I'm not an 'ignoranti' who believes celebrities are vapid and have nothing to...
"Americans Can't Handle Another Impeachment" Is Republican Propaganda. Don't Be Deceived. (9396 Hits)
by Linda Milazzo "Americans can't handle another impeachment."  So say the supporters of George W. Bush in their anti-impeachment...
CAN JIMMY CARTER DO FOR PALESTINE WHAT JACK MURTHA DID FOR IRAQ? (7009 Hits)
by Linda Milazzo Other than 2002 Nobel Prize Laureate, Jimmy Carter, no American politician has spoken honestly about Israel's occupation of...
Kennedys, Bushes and Oil: Public Interest vs. Self Interest (7919 Hits)
by Linda Milazzo    The history of the United States is filled with prominent families who achieved wealth, power and influence...
The Dissapperance of George P. Bush (5981 Hits)
by Linda Milazzo It was the year 2000. The new millennium. It featured a rising new star from a prominent American family. His name was George....
Related Articles:
We The People: An Open Letter to Congress (7564 Hits)
By Tom Chartier Dear Members of the 110th Congress: May I offer my congratulations to those of you who are newly elected. To ...
An Open Letter to the People and Government of the US - James Petras (7975 Hits)
by James Petras (And a Reply to the FARC) On a November 9, 2006, the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia-Peoples Army, (FARC-EP)...
America Has Left the Building: An Open Missive of Anger and Hope (6856 Hits)
by Phil Rockstroh  Recently, we've been plied and pummeled with the absurd proclamation that "the system worked" — that our...
An Open Letter to the New Congress - Investing in Hate: America’s Support of Israel (9375 Hits)
by William A. Cook “[It] is wrong to suggest that the Jewish people would support a government in Israel or anywhere else that...
OPEN LETTER TO MSNBC's KEITH OLBERMANN, OPEN LETTER TO MSNBC's KEITH OLBERMANN, (5285 Hits)
by Rod Amis Dear Keith, First of all, congratulations on your raings victories over Bill O (your cute abbreviation of Fox News's Bill...


Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Trackback(0)
Comments (0)add comment

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 

adsense

Top