Home     Writers     Op/Ed     Book Reviews     News     Bookstore     Photoshops     Submit     Search     Contact Us     Advertise  
  You are here: 

Sat

24

Mar

2007

The Ultimate in Ultrasounds
Saturday, 24 March 2007 11:09
by Jayne Lyn Stahl
Clearly, someone isn't thinking soundly in the South Carolina legislature given this week's passage, by a whopping 91-23 , of a bill that will require a woman, before having an abortion, to view ultrasound images of the fetus. The measure, which now goes to the state senate, does allow for rape and incest as exceptions to what can only be seen as an horrific, and medieval ordeal, and one that is tantamount to psychological waterboarding. While South Carolina isn't the only state giving a woman the option to look at an ultrasound of the fetus in her womb, it is the only state that mandates this procedure. All those for whom the words "civil rights" still resonate cannot afford to be anything less than outraged by this bill, and those who support it. (AP)

Apart from the obvious, and egregious, attempt to intimidate, and mortify a woman when she is at her most vulnerable, there are serious flaws in the logic underlying such a proposal . Think, for a moment, about the legal viability of requiring members of our armed forces, as part of boot camp, to sit through hours of footage showing the bombing of Hiroshima., that is unless you think it's okay to blow up a city, and many thousands of its civilians. Or, better still, how about playing a DVD featuring a corpse in advanced stages of rigor mortis before administering the death penalty? But, then , of course, these folks who consider abortion murder, by and large, have no problem with bombing the hell out of Baghdad, Beirut, Tehran ... these folks who want to deny a woman the right to choose claim that abortion means killing an unborn child have no problem with killing an adult man, or woman, on death row, in a thatched hut in southeast Asia, or in Iraq.

What eludes me is this: why is it that those who speak the loudest about protecting an unborn life don't give a damn about putting an innocent man to death for a crime he didn't commit? Why don't they apply their "ultrasound argument" to capital punishment, and insist that a convict who might otherwise be sentenced to lethal injection be forced to endure reels of footage reenacting not merely his crime, but every major event in the lives of his victims? But, of course, this would never be allowed. Why? It would go under the heading "cruel and unusual punishment," a phrase these "right to lifers" have perverted just as they have that of torture, and due process, but forcing a woman to look at ultrasound images of a pregnancy she feels she must terminate, does that not also constitute cruel and unusual punishment?

Anyone who thinks that this primitive, and deeply disturbing act of coercion will make a woman change her mind has no respect for the native intelligence, sense, and sensitivity of those who gave them life. This is about way more than terminating a pregnancy. Whether we agree with legalized abortion or not, anyone who supports neanderthal bills like this doesn't respect the right to privacy, and independent decision-making guaranteed us by the Constitution, and instead supports allowing the state to interfere, in a most insidious way, in what is, and must remain, a deeply private process. More importantly, we find here the seed of crime; the crime of contempt for the rights of the living in favor of those of the unborn and, by extension, contempt for the lives of those who serve in favor of those who profit from their service. Make no mistake, the right to choose is among our most fundamental, and inalienable civil rights.
More from this author:
Following in the Footsteps... (6337 Hits)
by Jayne Lyn Stahl The manic warriors, in Washington, are at it again, only now they've found someone who can manage more than one syllable at...
Worldwide Open Season on the Press (9422 Hits)
by Jayne Lyn Stahl On an otherwise quiet street in Istanbul, this morning, a 53 year old Turkish citizen of Armenian descent was gunned down...
On Hillary's announcement... (5488 Hits)
by Jayne Lyn Stahl You may have read the transcript of a speech given by George McGovern in The Nation last week in which he rightly...
An Open Letter to "The Decider" (5849 Hits)
by Jayne Lyn Stahl While the odds are probably better of getting a response from Santa, there are a few things I'd like to say if you can...
"Notes from the Undergrown: State of the Oilman Address" (5831 Hits)
by Jayne Lyn Stahl The president's speech last night was more important for what it didn't say than for what it did. In an address that could...
Related Articles:
Valerie Plame Wilson and the Ultimate Betrayal (4040 Hits)
by Larry C. Johnson Valerie’s problem is her decency and humanity. She has reasons most Americans don’t know to be really angry with...
Seeking Victory in Defeat: the Ultimate Deceit (4699 Hits)
by William A. Cook “Iraq will be a central challenge – perhaps the central challenge – for whoever succeeds President Bush and has to...
Media Alert: Hawking The Technofix - Business As Usual And The Ultimate Genocide (3753 Hits)
by Media Lens Last month, a senior UK government adviser warned of the real risk of a devastating rise in global temperatures of 4 degrees...
Revolutionary new physics could lead to ultimate weapons of mass destruction (2213 Hits)
by Roland Michel Tremblay As a sci-fi author and science consultant for films and television documentaries, I have made it my mission to seek...
Swine Flu: Ultimate Revolution in the Making (3108 Hits)
by Zahir Ebrahim The article headlined “Boston launches flu shot tracking – City to pinpoint areas of low rates of vaccination” back in...


Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Trackback(0)
Comments (1)add comment

a guest said:

0
Stereotypes don't make an argument
There are all kinds of pro-lifers: those who support war, and those who oppose it; those who support the death penalty and those who oppose it. It's simply not an argument to point to Evangelical Christians and say "they're horrible people, therefore the argument is wrong".

In our culture, we have plenty of opportunity to see dead bodies in movies and on t.v. If there were movies about abortion that showed dead preborn babies, then maybe there would be no need for ultrasounds. But as it is, abortion is shrouded in secrecy, and every attempt on the part of pro-lifers to show the truth is met with strong opposition. What's there to hide? Why are pro-aborts so afraid of people seeing the truth? If the pictures are fake, show real pictures. Go ahead, show the reality of abortion.

The truth is, it's not a pretty picture.

"Anyone who thinks that this primitive, and deeply disturbing act of coercion will make a woman change her mind has no respect for the native intelligence, sense, and sensitivity of those who gave them life."

Crisis Pregnancy Centres regularly use ultrasounds because they work to dissuade women from having abortions because they work. If they didn't work, then the law would not have been proposed, now, wouldn't?

There are many women who have had abortions who strongly wish someone would have shown them the truth about abortion, because they would have never chosen it had they known.

"This is about way more than terminating a pregnancy. Whether we agree with legalized abortion or not, anyone who supports neanderthal bills like this doesn't respect the right to privacy, and independent decision-making guaranteed us by the Constitution, and instead supports allowing the state to interfere, in a most insidious way, in what is, and must remain, a deeply private process"

Well the personal is political, right?

"More importantly, we find here the seed of crime; the crime of contempt for the rights of the living in favor of those of the unborn and, by extension, contempt for the lives of those who serve in favor of those who profit from their service. Make no mistake, the right to choose is among our most fundamental, and inalienable civil rights. "

The White Supremacists used to say that people in favour of equality favoured Blacks over Whites, too. It's not a zero sum game.
 
March 24, 2007 | url
Votes: +0

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 

adsense

Top