Notice: Trying to get property of non-object in /data1/atlanticfreepress.com/includes/router.php on line 819

Thu

12

Oct

2006

Who killed Michael Moore? (Why and what's the reason for?)
Written by Mickey Z   
Thursday, 12 October 2006 10:02

(Inspired by the recent assassination of Russian journalist Anna

Politkovskaya)
 

There's no shortage of outrage on the Left. Plenty of marches and manifestos to go along with the myriad calls to change this and take back that. Toss in the occasional fighting words and the intermittent flirtation with property damage and the Left typically does just enough to get itself effectively demonized by the mainstream...thus making it that much easier for the police to get away with swinging their nightsticks at the next "anti-globalization" protest.
So, here's my question: What would those who identify as leftists do if one of their high profile icons were openly eliminated? For the sake of argument, let's say the U.S. government (or one of its proxies)‹with the full support of the corporate media‹overtly did away with Michael Moore for his political beliefs and anti-corporate activism.
 

(Let me clarify something before you send off all those e-mails telling me Moore is a poser, fake, Democrat, opportunist, egomaniac, gatekeeper, whatever. I'm neither endorsing nor condemning Moore here; I'm simply recognizing his current status. In a society as heavily conditioned as ours‹a society that defines the "left" to include both Hillary Clinton and Ward Churchill‹Michael Moore might as well be Che fuckin' Guevara. In other words, choosing the nation's best-known "rebel" as a target would be nothing less than the government declaring war on dissidents of all stripes.)

So, what would the American left wing do if Moore were deported like Emma Goldman, Charlie Chaplin, and (almost) John Lennon? What if he was railroaded, denied a fair trial, and imprisoned like, say, Mumia Abu-Jamal or Leonard Peltier? What if he was to be publicly executed even in the face of massive protests, e.g. Sacco and Vanzetti, Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, Tookie Williams, or Ken Saro Wiwa of Nigeria? How about an assassination; a straight-out hit job along the lines of Fred Hampton, Malcolm X, Martin Luther King, Rachel Corrie, or even Patrice Lumumba and Salvador Allende?

Pick your poison; it doesn't matter how he's removed. The question remains: What if the U.S. government (or one of its proxies)‹with the full support of the corporate media‹transparently eliminated Michael Moore for his political beliefs and activism? Would we see anything more than a flood of articles, blog posts, t-shirts, and open letters from Sean Penn? Would the reaction go beyond asking the state for permission to protest and agreeing beforehand how many of those protestors will consent to be arrested? Would Bob Dylan re-write "Who Killed Davey Moore?" and have Bono sing it outside the Pentagon?

If that's the case, perhaps emboldened by the ease with which Moore's eradication was achieved, the government might then toss Noam Chomsky, Derrick Jensen, Cindy Sheehan, and Cynthia McKinney into prison for treason. More protests, more outrage, more fundraisers. Undaunted, Corporate America pulls all advertising dollars from Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert and forces their shows off the air. In response, 500 new blogs emerge and the "Free Jon Stewart" website registers nearly a million hits a day until it is hacked and removed.

Shortly thereafter, the government might start spying on American citizens and detaining prisoners without pressing charges while corporations ravage the earth in pursuit of profit, wiping out entire eco-systems in the process. Oops...sorry; they already did all that without being stopped.

Marveling at the relative lack of resistance, the powers-that-be may initiate mass arrests of suspected domestic eco-terrorists, culminating in the bombing of several ELF and/or ALF safe houses, leaving dozens dead? (Not possible, you say? Ask the folks at MOVE.) We know what the general public would say...the same thing they say every time a new "security precaution" is instituted: "If it makes us safer, I'm all for it." But how do you think lefty activists and thinkers would react? Would they/could they do anything to stop the onslaught?

This is not a facetious question, an accusation, or an ill-advised attempt at satire. I'm genuinely curious: What do you think radicals, progressives, liberals, anarchists, socialists, communists, and all such fellow travelers would do if the U.S. government (or one of its proxies)‹with the full support of the corporate media‹blatantly killed Michael Moore for his political beliefs and activism?

Quote this article on your site

To create link towards this article on your website,
copy and paste the text below in your page.




Preview :


Powered by QuoteThis © 2008
Comments (5)add comment

jack said:

0
guest
That would mean that bush could drop a nuke (nucular bom) on on Sri Lanka 'cause they, no doubt, would have been behind the hit. Just ask tony snow-job, which, incidentally, rhymes with bob-job (or maybe not). Whatever.
 
October 12, 2006 | url
Votes: +0

Jimmy Montague said:

0
That's a dumb question!
What do you mean, "What if Michael Moore got whacked?" That's a dumb question to which you should already know the answer. If you truly don't know the answer, find a spiritualist who can channel John F. Kennedy, Robert F. Kennedy, and Martin Luther King. Any one of those guys can tell you what the so-called Left in America will do if Michael Moore gets whacked.

Fortunately (or maybe not), Moore won't get whacked. Because he's a clown, the fascists will keep him around for everyone to see. They'll cite his antics as proof for all that dissent in America is alive and well. "This is still a free country," they'll say, "and if you'd all stop banging your tin cups on your prison bars and listen to Michael Moore for a few hours you'd see that's the truth."

Meanwhile, people you never heard of will be murdered. They'll be little guys who are trying to organize underground resistance cells. They'll be killed in innocuous ways, say, in auto accidents, or as bystanders in C-store holdups perpetrated by thugs who got away. That's how the fascists will maintain their regime, if it comes to that. But it probably won't, American "patriots" being what they are these days.

Try this slogan: "Dissent must be stifled but the show must go on!" That's how the fascists will operate.
 
October 12, 2006 | url
Votes: +0

Julie said:

0
...
Nothing new in that--his name was Alan Berg.
 
October 12, 2006
Votes: +0

Jim said:

0
oh, yeah
I've been saying for years that we should "pre-emptivly" move on both washington dc and the great state of texas.
 
October 13, 2006
Votes: +0

Jimmy Montague said:

0
Alan Berg
What I like about the story of Alan Berg is that he was an anti-gun zealot right up until the time he started getting death threats. Then he applied for a handgun permit. It's so fine when people display the courage of their convictions.
 
October 13, 2006 | url
Votes: +0

Write comment
smaller | bigger

security image
Write the displayed characters


busy
Last Updated ( Thursday, 10 July 2008 14:48 )