Home arrow Writings arrow Washington’s Game in Turkmenistan
Washington’s Game in Turkmenistan PDF Print E-mail
Written by Mike Whitney   
Sunday, 24 December 2006
by Mike Whitney

Was the Bush administration involved in the death of Turkmenistan’s President, Saparmurat Niyazov?

After all, Niyazov met all the criteria for Bush’s policy of “regime change”. He controlled massive natural gas reserves and he refused to take orders directly from Washington. Typically, these are the only factors that are weighed when considering whether a change of leadership is in order.

Naturally, Niyazov was on the same “target list” as Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Hugo Chavez and Saddam Hussein, the other foreign leaders whose only real crime is that they control vital supplies of dwindling resources. This puts themat odds with the American oil giants whose plansto expand their corporate empire throughout Central Asia and the Middle East is now a matter of public record.

Turkmenistan has reserves which amount to 22.5 trillion cubic meters, the second largest supplies in all of Asia. At this point nearly all of Turkmenistan’s gas is pumped through Russian energy giant Gazprom’s pipelines. As economist Mikail Delyagin said, “Because of Gazprom’s mismanagement, the European part of Russia cannot exist without Turkmen gas. Control over it is a categorical imperative for Russia’s development during the next 10 years”. (Victor Yasmann RFE/RL Current Affairs)

Disruption of supplies from Turkmenistan would be a severe blow to Gazprom’s economic vitality.

The Bush team wants to build a pipeline under the Caspian Sea to pump natural gas reserves to the West through Azerbaijan, Georgia, Turkey and out the Mediterranean corridor or down through Bush’s “new colony” in Afghanistan through Pakistan to the coast.If the Bush plan goes forward it would be a major setback to Gazprom which depends on Turkmenistan’s gas to supply Ukraine and Europe. As Stratford says, “Without those shipments, Russian state energy firm Gazprom would find it impossible to satisfy both domestic Russian natural gas demand and fulfill its export contracts to Europe and Turkey”.


It would also sabotage Niyazov’s prior commitments to China which hassigned contracts for a pipeline to bring natural gas through Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan. China’s future depends heavily on Turkmenistan. According to Alex Nicholson of the AP, “Niyazov promised to pipe 30 billion cubic meters of gas beginning January 2009. (China) also won an invitation last month to tap the giant Iolotan fields, which the late president declared, contained 7 trillion cubic meters of natural gas—or more than even Saudi Arabia’s proven reserves.”

“7 trillion cubic meters of natural gas”?!?

No wonder the Bush administration is paving the way for intervention.

At the very least, Niyazov’s death has turned out to be another “great opportunity” for Uncle Sam and it looks like Bush may have already put the pieces in place to take full advantage of it.

For example, as soon as Niyazov’s death was announced,his second in command, Ovez Atayev, was removed from power by Deputy Prime Minister, Gurbanguly Berdymukhammedov, under trumped charges of “harassing and humiliating his daughter in law” or some other such nonsense.

Now, there’s a fortunate coincidence.

So, now the president is dead, his successor is under indictment and there are reports that a number of prominant ex-patriots will soon be returning to Turkmenistan to take part in the political “free-for-all”.

Haven’t we seen this performance before?

If this sounds like a script written in Washington, it’s probably because it was. Most of Bush’s stooges in Iraq were assembled outside of the country before the 2003 invasion and still have the administration’s unfailing support. The upcoming circus in Turkmenistan will probably be more of the same.

The media, of course, has played its traditional role of championing Washington’s interventions by demanding “free elections”; another comical part of the Bush-kabuki which never seems to change. Turkmenistan has no history of free elections, but the western press can be expected to follow the directives of their political overlords who will doubtless insist that Turkmenistan participate in Bush’s “Global Democratic Revolution”. (excluding democratically-elected Hamas, of course)

But Bush is facing fierce headwinds in Turkmenistan. If we look back at the “color coded” revolutions which were orchestrated by American NGOs and American intelligence agencies, we can see that (despite the planning and huge commitment of financial resources) they accomplished nothing of lasting value. Ukraine and Kyrgyzstan are back within Russia's orbit and Georgia will soon follow. (or freeze to death in the cold without access to Russia's natural gas)

Eurasia is Russia and China’s backyard and they’ve build up the necessary defenses to keep Washington out. Bush can waste-away in Afghanistan for another 5 or 6 years dreaming of "victory", but his “Grand Plan” for the region is basically in ruins. The United States will not prevail in Central Asia any more than it will in Iraq.

Nevertheless, the plan is going forward and Bush apparently has the requisite agents in place to give him hope for success. According the RIA Novosti, “Many people in the former president’s inner circle were oriented towards Europe.”

Indeed.

The power struggle is bound to be ferocious and Washington will be right in the “thick of it”. At this juncture, Bush has no choice but to pull out the stops and do everything in his power to establish an American client in Turkmenistan. The geopolitical stakes are too high to ignore. The country is perfectly situated between Russia and Iran on the Caspian Sea, the epicenter of the world’s remaining resources. In fact, the Pentagon’s own maps show Turkmenistan at the very center of CENTCOM’s global resource war; a pivotal location for military installations and pipeline corridors. It provides ready-access to an estimated 2 trillion in oil reserves in the Caspian Sea, as well as the massive natural gas supplies. At the same time, a change of leadership could block arch-rival Gazprom from extending its dominance throughout the region by handing over control to western energy corporations.

This is not a battle that the Washington warlords can afford to lose, but victory will not come easily. Neither Iran nor Russia can allow Bush to take over Turkmenistan without a fight. Iran would be surrounded on all sides by the US and cut off from its neighbors to the northbyhostile American forces. At the same time, US military bases would be set up evencloser to the Iranian capitalof Tehran.

For Russia, an American client in Turkmenistan wouldbe a stiff challenge to its role as the region’s superpower; creating the looming possibility that NATO would get an even bigger foothold in Central Asia and threaten the delicate balance of power.

Turkmenistan is a key piece in the new “Great Game”; the ongoing struggle for dominance in Central Asia. Whether Washington played a part in Niyazov’s untimely death or not is almost irrelevant. The Bush-Cheney oiligarchy have demonstrated a willingness to fight-to-the-death for every thimbleful of oil or natural gas left on planet earth. This makes the likelihood for a sudden eruption of violence Turkmenistan all the more probable.

As the weeks and months go by, we can expect to see the usual trappings of US involvement; the CIA-funded public demonstrations, the American-friendly "democracy promoting" coverage in the media, and the comical parade of ex-patriots who matriculated in US right-wing think tanks. The whole charade is being cobbled together as part of the failed strategy to control the world’s remaining resources.

The faces may vary, but the routine is always the same.
 
Comments (4)add comment
jb: Not as I understand it
>>>After all, Niyazov met all the criteria for Bush’s policy of “regime change”. He controlled massive natural gas reserves and he refused to take orders directly from Washington. Typically, these are the only factors that are weighed when considering whethera change of leadership is in order.
1

December 25, 2006
jb2: (part 2)

I think that on the contrary, this is an example of the hypocracy of the Bush and Neocon policy. The USA turned a blind eye to Niyazov's excesses while railing on about North Korea (a country without much in the way of fossil fuel I might add). That is probably because Niyazov was willing "play ball" (as we call it here in Amerrca) with the USA by allowing the USA flyover rights during the Afghanistan Campaign, and by taking a hard line against Islamic movements. No, Im afraid this is not an example of USA conspiricy. It is proof that we are more than happy to tolarate Kim Jong Il types (this guy sounds like he might even have been worse) if they are willing to "Play Ball" . I highly doubt that Niyazovs death was US orchestrated, more likely it is a sad example of the hyporcricy of our foreign policy and our stated intentions of bringing freedom to the world.
For these reasons, I don't think this article was very well thought out.
2

December 25, 2006
cms: moonbat
Is there nothing you won't attribute to America. This is just idiotic. Do you suppose that the USA fed Turkmenbashi high-fat content food for the past three decades in a stealthy plan to clog his arteries? Morons. If there was a hint of polonium, then look for sinister putinesque intrigues. When a senior citizen has clogged arteries, look to his diet and lifestyle.
3

December 25, 2006
cms: and I almost forgot
Merry Christmas!
4

December 25, 2006

Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote

busy


Did you enjoy this article? Please bookmark it onto:
Digg!Reddit!Del.icio.us!Newsvine!Furl!Fark!Yahoo!Ma.gnolia!Add this social bookmarking functionality to your website! title=

Recommend this article...

 

Related Articles/Posts

< Prev   Next >
Advertise on more
than 70 of the
Internet's Top
Progressive Blogs!




Enter your email address for the Atlantic Free Press Daily Newsletter:

More Author Articles

More Articles...
Sleeping in Cars in the USA
Saturday, 07 June 2008
Mike Whitney
(724)
Read more
The Remorseless Algebra of a Deflationary Death Spiral
Friday, 06 June 2008
Mike Whitney
(1047)
Read more
The Deflation Time Bomb
Friday, 18 January 2008
Mike Whitney
(1664)
Read more
Primary Smell: Vote Machine Scandal Brewing - The Winning Ticket: Hillary and Diebold in 2008
Saturday, 12 January 2008
Mike Whitney
(1619)
Read more
Who Salute the Butcher's Apron
Saturday, 22 December 2007
Mike Whitney
(1488)
Read more
An Interview with Nir Rosen "Iraq Doesn't Exist Anymore"
Monday, 03 December 2007
Mike Whitney
(1619)
Read more
Pentagon Fudging Its Casualties Numbers
Sunday, 18 November 2007
Mike Whitney
(1644)
Read more
It's Time for the Banks to Face the Hangman
Saturday, 20 October 2007
Mike Whitney
(1637)
Read more
The Era of Global Financial Instability
Friday, 21 September 2007
Mike Whitney
(2027)
Read more
U.S. Banks Brace for Storm Surge as Dollar and Credit System Reel
Tuesday, 18 September 2007
Mike Whitney
(2354)
Read more
Soup Kitchen U.S.A.
Thursday, 13 September 2007
Mike Whitney
(2159)
Read more
Are the Banks in Trouble?
Monday, 10 September 2007
Mike Whitney
(3063)
Read more
Information Warfare, Psy-ops and the Power of Myth
Monday, 03 September 2007
Mike Whitney
(2030)
Read more
Stock Market Brushfire; Will there be a run on the banks?
Monday, 13 August 2007
Mike Whitney
(3809)
Read more
The Grim Reaper pays a visit to Wall Street
Saturday, 11 August 2007
Mike Whitney
(2469)
Read more
Judgment Week on Wall Street
Tuesday, 07 August 2007
Mike Whitney
(2133)
Read more
Trouble in Hedgistan: “Its gonna get a lot worse”
Friday, 27 July 2007
Mike Whitney
(2236)
Read more
Kissinger’s Secret Meeting With Putin
Friday, 20 July 2007
Mike Whitney
(2662)
Read more
“What are we supposed to do with our Dead”: Odds n’ Ends in the War on Terror
Wednesday, 18 July 2007
Mike Whitney
(1871)
Read more
Demonizing Putin: The Summit in Kennebunkport
Friday, 13 July 2007
Mike Whitney
(4753)
Read more
The Fed's role in the Bear Stearns Meltdown
Monday, 02 July 2007
Mike Whitney
(2787)
Read more
The Jose Padilla Case: Screenplay by Mel Brooks
Wednesday, 27 June 2007
Mike Whitney
(2352)
Read more
Iraqis to Bush: “You have left us with nothing”
Saturday, 23 June 2007
Mike Whitney
(2218)
Read more
The CIA and Fatah; Spies, Quislings and the Palestinian Authority
Friday, 22 June 2007
Mike Whitney
(2097)
Read more
Putin’s War-whoop: The impending clash with Russia
Friday, 22 June 2007
Mike Whitney
(2624)
Read more
The Battle of Gaza
Monday, 18 June 2007
Mike Whitney
(2509)
Read more
Putin’s Censored Press Conference: The transcript you weren’t supposed to see
Tuesday, 12 June 2007
Mike Whitney
(2513)
Read more
The Global Liquidity Crisis
Wednesday, 06 June 2007
Mike Whitney
(3619)
Read more
Bush's New Middle East
Wednesday, 30 May 2007
Mike Whitney
(2532)
Read more
The Swan Song for the Democrats
Tuesday, 29 May 2007
Mike Whitney
(2088)
Read more
How Will They Destroy Ron Paul?
Tuesday, 29 May 2007
Mike Whitney
(3550)
Read more
Paulson’s Kabuki: Integrating China into the Neoliberal System
Wednesday, 23 May 2007
Mike Whitney
(2479)
Read more
"Are We Headed for Another Great Depression?" My talks with Elaine Meinel Supkis
Thursday, 10 May 2007
Mike Whitney
(4169)
Read more
Post Mortem for the Stock Market
Thursday, 03 May 2007
Mike Whitney
(3367)
Read more
Jose Padilla and the Zucchini Prosecution
Tuesday, 01 May 2007
Mike Whitney
(2560)
Read more
Housing Bubble Boondoggle: "Is it too late to get out"?
Thursday, 26 April 2007
Mike Whitney
(3352)
Read more
Trouble in Squanderville
Wednesday, 18 April 2007
Mike Whitney
(2340)
Read more
Doomsday for the Greenback
Thursday, 12 April 2007
Mike Whitney
(2975)
Read more
Velkomin to the United States of Foreclosure
Monday, 19 March 2007
Mike Whitney
(4881)
Read more
The Rise of the Rove Reich
Monday, 12 March 2007
Mike Whitney
(3560)
Read more
Global Realignment and the Decline of the Superpower
Friday, 09 March 2007
Mike Whitney
(2835)
Read more
“Black Tuesday” - Après le deluge
Thursday, 08 March 2007
Mike Whitney
(3101)
Read more
Juicing the Stock Market; the secret maneuverings of the Plunge Protection Team
Monday, 05 March 2007
Mike Whitney
(3560)
Read more
Tuesday's Market Meltdown; Greenspan's "invisible hand"
Thursday, 01 March 2007
Mike Whitney
(2806)
Read more
“Doomsday Dick” and the Plague of Frogs
Tuesday, 27 February 2007
Mike Whitney
(2530)
Read more
Operation FALCON and the Looming Police State
Monday, 26 February 2007
Mike Whitney
(2972)
Read more
The Second Great Depression
Thursday, 22 February 2007
Mike Whitney
(10495)
Read more
Blackmailing Bush - How the "Dear Leader" Duped "The Decider"
Friday, 16 February 2007
Mike Whitney
(3103)
Read more
The Bombing of the Golden Dome Mosque; one year later
Tuesday, 13 February 2007
Mike Whitney
(2916)
Read more
Bush Caves in on North Korea
Thursday, 08 February 2007
Mike Whitney
(2700)
Read more

Expathos
               No account yet?




Page was generated in 3.423763 seconds

ATLANTIC FREE PRESS IS LOADING. THANK YOU FOR YOUR PATIENCE.