Home     Writers     Op/Ed     Book Reviews     News     Bookstore     Photoshops     Submit     Search     Contact Us     Advertise  
  You are here: 

Tue

10

Oct

2006

BREAKING NEWS: Eisenhower Carrier Group Sails for Iran Theater
Tuesday, 10 October 2006 10:37

The nuclear-powered aircraft carrier Eisenhower and its accompanying strike force of cruiser, destroyer and attack submarine slipped their moorings and headed off for the Persian Gulf region on Oct. 2, as I had predicted in a piece in The Nation magazine a few weeks back.

The Eisenhower strike force, according to my sources, is scheduled to arrive in the vicinity of Iran around October 21, at the same time as a second flotilla of minesweepers and other ships.

This build-up of naval power around the coast of Iran, according to some military sources, is in preparation for an air attack on Iran that would target not just Iran's nuclear enrichment facilities, but its entire military command and control system.

While such an attack could be expected to unleash a wave of military violence all over Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and elsewhere against American forces and interests and against oil wells, pipelines and loading vacilities, as well as a mining of the Persian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz, with a resulting skyrocketing of global oil prices, the real goal of this new war by the U.S. would be ensuring Republican control of the House and Senate.

It seems increasingly clear that the Republican Party is going to lose its grip on the House of Representatives, and that it may even lose control of the Senate, barring some dramatic October Surprise by the president. So far, the surprises have been working against Republicans, with the Foley sex scandal, the evidence that Abramoff's bribery reached right into the inner sanctum of the White House, and the deteriorating U.S. position in Iraq.

With the number of House seats reportedly "in play" now rising from 15 to 30 and now 50, President Bush is looking at the possibility of a blow out Nov. 7 that could see him facing a Democratic Congress bent on revenge for five six years of systematic abuse.

Bush has committed a long string of impeachable crimes against the Constitution, the Republic and the American people -- everything from lying to the Congress and the 9-11 Commission, obstructing an investigation into the outing of CIA agent Valerie Plame, abuse of power, violation of federal laws like the Foreign Surveillance Intelligence Act, dereliction of duty and criminal negligence, and war crimes. He can expect a Democratic Congress to call him to account for at least some of these crimes, whatever House minority leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) may say today.

This means that the worse things look for Republican chances in November, the greater the likelihood that a desperate President Bush will order a disastrous attack on Iran -- one that would have the country enter into a third, even worse, war even as it is currently busy losing two others. But Bush and his gang of cronies don't care about initiating a disaster. They're focussed on the disaster that will hit them if they don't turn around the November election. Sacrificing the country or its young men and women in uniform, or the lives of innocent Iranians, is not a concern, any more than it was when Bush ordered the invasion of Iraq.

Clearly such a war would be an act of madness, and yet we know that the plans, already drawn up, are being updated and fine-tuned now by generals and admirals whose twisted sense of patriotism has them giving primary loyalty to a demented commander in chief instead of to the Constitutional and the people of the United States, to both of which they swore an oath to protect.

I hope I am wrong about all this, but the sailing of the Eisenhower, which had been pushed forward recently by about a month by the Pentagon for clearly political reasons, makes me think I'm right. A key will be what happens with the Enterprise carrier strike force, which has already been on station in the Arabian Sea for six months, where it has been launching air strikes against Afghanistan and Iraq targets. Ordinarily, such deployments last six months and then the carrier group returns to base for resupply and for R&R for the crew. If the Enterprise is held over for a longer deployment, after the arrival of the Eisenhower, we will know that something serious is planned.

What is deeply troubling here is the total silence on the part of the Democratic Party opposition. Not one Democrat in Congress, and as far as I know, not one Democratic candidate for Congress -- not even anti-war insurgent Ned Lamont in Connecticut -- has demanded an answer from Bush and the Pentagon for the obvious military buildup around Iran, or about published reports that the U.S. already has special forces in side Iran backing the terrorist organization MEK, and selecting targets for U.S. bombardment.

If and when the U.S. attacks Iran, leading to a predicable -- if temporary -- rallying around the flag by the American public, and to an upset win by incumbent Republican congressional candidates, Democrats will have only themselves to blame for the debacle.

But it will be the American people -- and especially the people of Iran -- who will be the victims of this treacherous deed and this treasonous failure of will.


More from this author:
U.S. Military Has Killed Up to 238,000 Iraqi Civilians (11218 Hits)
A just-released study by researchers at Johns Hopkins University, published in the current issue of the prestigious British medical journal The...
Bush's Middle East Strategy, and Presidency, Lie in Ruins as Republicans Scurry Away (9678 Hits)
by Dave Lindorff Well, so much for Iraqi “sovereignty.” So much too for "staying the course" and for "fighting the terrorists...
Time for Truth and Consequences (8871 Hits)
by Dave Lindorff The Bush administration, losing the war in Iraq, has come with a "new" strategy: setting a timetable for Iraq's...
Let's March in January! An Impeachment Call to Action (10996 Hits)
by Dave Lindorff I'm going to go out on a limb here and predict that, barring some incredible act of criminal cynicism such as the...
Why Nancy Pelosi Has it Wrong on Impeachment (9435 Hits)
by Dave Lindorff Forget her "Pledge," She Took an Oath: Why Pelosi is Wrong on Impeachment House minority leader Nancy Pelosi...
Related Articles:
The Breaking Point (8422 Hits)
It was another bad week in Iraq. While bodies were piling up in the Baghdad morgue and the militia fighting steadily intensified, the Bush...
Nukes: Iran and North Korea are not the problem (13749 Hits)
by Mickey Z. Thanks to the nuclear aspirations of North Korea and Iran, there's no shortage of rhetoric along these lines: "We can't let...
Iran turns up the Heat (6972 Hits)
by Mike Whitney By now, anyone with a lick of sense can see that the war in Iraq has been a dead-loss. Still, few people understand how it...
Gee Whiz, Iran Training Militia, Who Knew? (7072 Hits)
by Larry C Johnson Well, the New York Times just got sucked in again to help the Bush Administration make the case for starting a war with...
Peace Groups Hold “Mandate for Peace” Congressional Call-in Day In Advance of Iraq Study Group Report (8368 Hits)
Thousands call Congress to remind their representatives that voters issued a Mandate for Peace in the mid-term elections and expect Congress to end...


Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Trackback(0)
Comments (5)add comment

erie miller said:

0
the sound of one shoe dropping!
dang, davey, no replies to your post. i guess everyone's stunned by your prescience. either that or they're out back digging fall-out shelters for their families.

i have to disagree with you davey; i don't think bush has the balls or the sense to pull it off.

 
November 04, 2006
Votes: +0

kurtpuschmann said:

0
...
I fear your fears are right,
I hope your fears are wrong
 
November 08, 2006
Votes: +0

ajr said:

0
Watch The Skies
Funny Fall Out shelters should be mentioned, I just built a makeshift one, and am sleeping blindfolded with ear plugs (5ktn blast @16 miles = retinal burns and eardrum rupture). It's 9/11 in Britain, and 11/11 is our remembrance day... All our Eurofighters are stationed at one station, unheard of in military planning...which makes me wonder if they've discovered they're a bag of shit and want ot do away with them; The towns council moved North, the Social Services closed, alot of the prominent Freemasons are out of town for the week, there's a Carrier moored just off the coast, planned wind turbine tests have been mothballed a mile out at sea, and if a suitcase nuke were to be used - most of the immediate area it would effect is pencilled in for sea-level flooding soon, and over 30 'petrol' (JP4) tankers a day for several weeks visit the airbase in question... Someone is building one hell of a false flag... Cheers, and maybe Goodbye, Horncastle, Lincs. UK
 
November 10, 2006 | url
Votes: +0

manchurian_mccain said:

0
More War Coming
Anybody here ever check out: The Project for a New American Century?
 
November 16, 2006 | url
Votes: +0

b said:

0
...
WE HAVE FOUR AIRCRAFT CARRIERS WITHIN 25 MILES OF EACH OTHER OFF THE COAST OF IRAN. THIS SHOULD NEVER BE DONE FROM A MILITARY STANDPOINT. THE POWERS THAT BEAREGOING TOSTAND DOWN AND LETOUR DEDICATED SERVICE MEN AND WOMAN BE SLAUGHTERED ON THESE CARRIERS.OF COURSE A MISSILE WILL HIT ONE, WITHIN A HALF HOUR THE OTHERS WILL BE ALL HIT CAMERAS ROLLING JUST LIKE 9-11. THE RESOLVE TO NUKE IRAN AFTER THIS HAPPENS WILL BE SO STRONG, THEIR WILL BE NO HESITATION OR CHOICE BUT TO DO JUST THAT. GET YOUR MONEY OUT OF THE STOCK MARKET NOW
 
December 10, 2006
Votes: +0

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 

adsense

Top