|
by Dave Lindorff
What the hell is Barack Obama talking about?
He says that America should be talking with leaders in Cuba, Iran, Venezuela, Korea, Syria. Fine. But he calls this “talking with our enemies.”
What enemies?
Let’s get something straight. Enemies are people who are fighting against you, who are trying to destroy you. Is Cuba fighting against America? Is Iran fighting against America? Is Venezuela fighting against America? Syria? China? No. These countries may be rivals, but they are not enemies.
The closest we come to having an actual enemy in today’s world is North Korea, where we are technically still in some kind of truce following a hot war, but of course that war itself has been over for half a frigging century, and nobody has been killing anyone on the Korean Peninsula in decades.
The truth is, America doesn’t have any real enemies, except for the
ones it has made for itself in Iraq and Afghanistan, and of course the
Al Qaeda organization. But Al Qaeda is a gang of terrorists, not a
country, and in Afghanistan it is movement, the Taliban, once the
government of that country, which we overthrew. And even there, where
we have enemies, talk is better than war. It is obvious that at some
point if we are ever to exit from Iraq and Afghanistan, there will have
to be talks with the people we are fighting. Afghanistan’s leaders have
said this—that there will have to be talks with the Taliban. And Bush’s
own “Iraq Study Group,” headed by former Republican Secretary of State
James Baker and former Democratic Congressman Lee Hamilton, concluded
that the US will have to negotiate to settle the Iraq conflict. Both
those processes should be begun immediately, not after more thousands
have been killed.
By calling other countries “enemies,” Obama fell into a trap of his own
making, though admittedly, he’s not the first to define all these rival
nations as enemies. It’s a logical outcome of the Bush/Cheney position
that “either you’re with us or you’re against us.”
Instead of buying into that nonsense, Obama should have questioned the
premise. Then he wouldn’t be in the mess he’s in now, trying to
fine-tune whom he would talk to and whom he wouldn’t talk to. Erstwhile
Democratic presidential candidate and former Alaskan Senator Mike
Gravel had it right when, during an early TV “debate” before the media
decided to black him out, he replied to the moderator’s stupid question
to all the candidates of “Who, after Iran, are America’s biggest
enemies?” He challenged the premise, asking, “Iran’s not our enemy. Who
are we afraid of? We don’t have any enemies.” He got one of the biggest
applauses of the evening for that.
As for the basic point—talking with people we have disagreements or
rivalries with—it is obvious that not talking is idiotic, and gets you
nowhere—or worse, into a war.
Let’s take Cuba. For exactly half a century since its Communist
revolution, we have treated Cuba like a mortal enemy, blockading the
country, forcing other countries to join us in an embargo (an act of
war, by the way), plotting and attempting to assassinate the country’s
leader, Fidel Castro, and financing and supporting an obsessed group of
dispossessed rich Cubans who want to return the island to its
mob-infested, neo-colonial days. In those 50 years, the only thing not
talking has accomplished has been the impoverishment of two generations
of Cubans. Meanwhile, of course, the US has talked, conceded, caved in,
given in, pandered and invested in China, another Communist country
that, unlike Cuba, actually has fought against the US (in Korea, by
proxy in Vietnam, and against an ally, Taiwan). There is clearly no
logical reason for not talking with Cuba, and if we were talking with
Cuba, life there would be better, and no doubt, things would be better
here, too.
Iran is another example. It is known that when the US invaded Iraq, in
2003, Iran tried desperately to initiate talks with the US. The
Bush/Cheney administration didn’t want to talk. It was calling Iran an
“Axis of Evil” nation. Had talks begun, there might not even be a
nuclear dispute today. Indeed, there might not even have been a
rivalry. Instead, we now have the Bush/Cheney administration pushing
forward for plans to attack Iran.
We could go back to Iraq, too, of course. Before the US launched its
attack, Saddam Hussein was telling the Bush/Cheney administration he
was willing to leave the country. All he wanted was a safe haven like
Idi Amin got, and a billion dollars. We were not told about this offer
until years later. Yet think how much cheaper that solution, arrived at
through a little talking, would have been than what we got through not
talking. Instead of letting Hussein run off with a billion of his own
ill-gotten wealth, we’ve spent close to a trillion dollars, killed
upwards of a million innocent Iraqis, destroyed a country, driven four
million people in a nation of 24 million into exile, ruined America’s
global reputation, and bankrupted the US treasury, not to mention
running up the price of oil four-fold.
Talk is cheap, I’d say.
Obama should be more forthright and admit that America has no enemies, and that we can talk to anyone

Recommend this article... |