Tell me that this doesn't sound like something out of a history of Nazi tactics in World War II:
The rules [of engagement]t explicitly allowed the killing of unarmed Iraqis under certain circumstances...Specifically, the snipers were allowed to shoot unarmed people running away from explosions or firefights....Of course, it's not unusual for innocent people to run from explosions.
Didier, who has since been promoted to captain, said that "if that individual makes contact with you and then breaks contact of their own accord and disarms themselves while they are breaking contact, they are still an engageable target because they are not wounded, nor did they surrender." He explained, "They are only breaking contact so that they can engage coalition forces at a later time." In court, Sgt. Anthony Murphy, one of the snipers who was responsible for a questionable kill, testified that he interpreted this order about breaking contact so they can engage at a later time as: "Engage fleeing local nationals without weapons."
In other words, if an innocent, unarmed Iraqi runs away to seek safety from a suicide bombing, a missile attack or a gunfight — which any human being would instinctively do — then he is fair game to be killed by an American sniper.
The excerpt above comes from a story in Salon.com, "Killing by the Numbers," about an "elite" U.S. sniper squad that murdered a captured, unarmed civilian in cold blood. A more detailed excerpt follows below, but I'd like to deal briefly with one ancillary aspect first.
The story expands to talk more generally about the sniper program in Iraq, and is careful — overly careful — to emphasize that the snipers responsible for so many "questionable kills" are operating in very stressful conditions: sleep-deprived, sweltering in deadly heat, surrounded by potential "hostiles," at constant risk of attack. All true, of course, but it prompts this simple question: What the hell are they doing there in the first place? Why are they squatting and sweltering in "hides" in a foreign land, looking to kill people who never attacked the United States?
Yes, it is entirely understandable that a soldier subjected to
nerve-wracking, physically tormenting conditions might fail to act with
reason, patience, judgement and prudence. But is this supposed to be
some kind of excuse for crimes committed within the context of a larger
crime: a war of aggression, the military invasion and occupation of a
foreign country without any provocation? Surely many of the Nazi
atrocities were committed by men under unbearable mental and physical
strain as well. So what? Were they absolved of their crimes? And more
importantly — were their leaders absolved for instigating the larger
crime that engendered these atrocities?
For as the story also shows, the "questionable kills" by American
snipers derive largely from the murderous "rules of engagement" they
are given by their superiors — and by the anxiety of their officers to
produce big "kill numbers" to appease the bloodlust — and PR needs — of
the thugs in the White House and their "counterinsurgency genius,"
David Petraeus.
But let's return to the story of how a sniper squad murdered Genei
Nesir Khudair al-Janabi, an Iraqi vegetable farmer, almost one year
ago, after he stumbled upon their "hide" on the banks of the Euphrates.
(Continued after the jump)
From Salon.com:
Sandoval, who had been woken by the sound of the Iraqi's approach,
motioned toward Vela's gun. Taking the signal, Vela pointed the 9 mm
pistol at the farmer's face.
Sandoval woke up Redfern. Redfern and Vela waved the Iraqi into the
hide, forced him down on his stomach and put the corner of the plastic
poncho over his head. Vela stood over the man with the pistol, while
Redfern ran his hands over Khudair's shoulders, arms, sides, back and
chest in a cursory search. No weapons.
Vela woke Hensley and told him an unarmed Iraqi was in the hide.
Hensley stood up, walked over to the Iraqi — and from a standing
position dropped a knee into his back with the full force of his body.
Khudair threw his head back, gasping for wind. "Staff Sgt. Hensley
grabbed him by the mouth," Vela testified, "and told him to shut up or
he was going to kill him."
Hensley wrapped parachute cord around the Iraqi's hands and Redfern
dragged him deeper into the snipers' hide.... Vela said Hensley sat
down on the berm for a moment. He then got up and radioed their
superior officer, Didier. Hensley reported that he had spotted an Iraqi
nearby armed with an AK-47. But Vela couldn't see anyone who matched
that description. Vela alerted Hand, who was fading in and out of sleep
on a nearby berm, that Hensley "might have seen something." Then
Hensley ordered Vela to retrieve his pistol from Sandoval in the pump
house....
Sandoval peered around the pump house wall to look into the hide.
Khudair was still there. Vela was sitting on his rear, with one leg
cocked up and an elbow resting on his knee, holding the pistol in one
hand.
Inside the hide, Hensley radioed Didier a second time, saying an
insurgent was moving closer to their position. Hensley asked permission
to do a "close kill" to avoid being compromised.
Vela then looked around, but still didn't see any armed insurgent. "I
was just really confused about what he was saying," Vela testified.
Hensley untied the Iraqi. "I thought we were going to let him go," Vela told the Army court.
"Are you ready?" Hensley allegedly asked Vela.
Hensley stepped aside. "Shoot," he said.
Vela claimed during testimony that he doesn't remember pulling the
trigger. "It took me a second to realize that the shot had come from
the pistol and it was in my hand."
Hensley radioed to Didier that the snipers had killed an insurgent.
Meanwhile, the Iraqi's body convulsed. Hensley "kind of laughed" at the
spectacle, according to Vela. Hensley then "[punched] the guy in the
throat, and said, 'Shoot him again,' which I did."
Vela testified that after he shot the man for the second time, Hensley
pulled an AK-47 out of his rucksack and placed it on the body. The
snipers then agreed on a story about the shooting consistent with
Hensley's radio calls...
Sandoval was charged with murder for the deaths on April 27 and May 11,
but convicted only of planting command wire in connection with the
April 27 killing. He served about a month and a half in prison. The
Army charged Hensley with three murders for the shootings of April 14,
April 27 and May 11. He was convicted of planting a weapon, for placing
the AK-47 next to Khudair, and insubordination. He was sentenced to
time served and busted down to sergeant.
On February 10, 2008, however, Vela was sentenced to 10 years in a military prison for the murder of Khudair.
It goes without saying that the officers who put these men in this
situation — not to mention the civilian "leaders" in Washington who
instigated the mass murder in Iraq — suffered not the slightest adverse
consequence of this crime, for which they bear the primary
responsibility.
However, it is unlikely that the scapegoat — and murderer — Vela will
ever serve his whole term for his part in the crime. The case of a
Marine squad who kidnapped and murdered an Iraqi man in Hamdania is
instructive on this point, as AP reported this week:
A Marine from Camp Pendleton who was sentenced to 15 years
in the brig for killing an Iraqi civilian had his term reduced by four
years, the man's attorney said Wednesday.
Rich Brannon,
the civilian lawyer for Lawrence G. Hutchins III, said the reduction
came after he appealed for clemency to Lt. Gen. Samuel T. Helland,
Hutchins' commanding general. "I was pleased to see a reduction, but I
would like to see more," Brannon told The Associated Press in a phone
call from North Carolina.
Hutchins, of Plymouth, Mass., was the leader of an eight-man squad
accused of kidnapping Hashim Ibrahim Awad, 52, from his home in April
2006, then marching him to a ditch and shooting him to death. The
killing took place in Hamdania, a small village in Al Anbar province.
Hutchins was sentenced Aug. 3 after being convicted of murder,
conspiracy to commit murder, making a false official statement and
larceny. He had been charged with premeditated murder, but
premeditation was removed from the verdict, meaning Hutchins no longer
faced a mandatory life sentence.
All eight squad members — seven Marines and one Navy corpsmen — were
initially charged with murder and kidnapping, but four lower-ranking
Marines and the sailor cut deals with prosecutors in exchange for their
testimony and received sentences ranging from one to eight years in
prison.
Other Marines were acquitted of murder but convicted of lesser charges and freed after their courts-martial.
When even the scapegoats escape justice, what possible hope can there
be that the perpetrators and abettors of the Nazi-like war crime in
Iraq will ever pay the price — or even suffer the slightest trouble —
for their monstrous outrage?
bla blaa blaa...same anti-American, anti-Military, anti-war drivel that has been going around for years. No Nazi-like war crimes going on in Iraq other than the ones committed by Al-Queda and insurgents. Grow up! Life isn't always pretty...and sometimes it has to be that way!
1
May 11, 2008
Dan: To "Me"
How appropriate the title of your comment, considering the depths of the ignorance you portray. True, life isn't always pretty, but then, how much of our own actions, as a nation, are directly responsible for the ugliness of life. What comes around does indeed go around.
It is NOT anti-American to criticize the actions of your government, in fact, just the opposite. It is decidedly PRO American to criticize. Your ignorance is not surprising, though. Every day millions of Americans choose ignorance over truth. It is, after all, a more comfortable state.
At least temporarily.
2
May 12, 2008
Write comment
Did you enjoy this article? Please bookmark it onto: