Normally I ignore religious controversy, but the latest flap surrounding incoming Democratic Congressman Keith Ellison, a muslim who intends to take the oath of office with his hand on the Quran, demands comment. If you're not muslim then mind your own business. Here's the bottomline--the Christians who are in an uproar over Ellison's plan and who insist that the oath can only be taken with the Bible probably ought to read the damn Bible. Why? Because the Bible, specifically the New Testament, contains clear instruction about taking oaths. According to James 5:12 (Whole Chapter):
But above all, [James 1:16] my brethren, [Matt 5:34-37] do not swear, either by heaven or by earth or with any other oath; but your yes is to be yes, and your no, no, so that you may not fall under judgment.
Got it? If you are really a practicing Christian who believes that the Bible is the inerrant word of God then shouldn't you follow its dictates? When it comes to taking an oath of office an authentic Christian should not swear on a Bible. A simple yes will suffice.
Someone alert that bozo Dennis Praeger. Praeger, who hosts a radio talk show, was running around Thursday sounding the alarm about Ellison. According to Praeger:
Devotees of multiculturalism and political correctness who do not see how damaging to the fabric of American civilization it is to allow Ellison to choose his own book need only imagine a racist elected to Congress. Would they allow him to choose Hitler's "Mein Kampf," the Nazis' bible, for his oath? And if not, why not? On what grounds will those defending Ellison's right to choose his favorite book deny that same right to a racist who is elected to public office?Thank you Dennis Praeger for providing the most stupid, outrageous comment by any pundit in recent memory. Since you are a self-appointed vigilante for correct religious observance, how about focusing on all of those Christians who are flagrantly violating a Biblical tenet by swearing on the Bible? Jesus! At least be theologically informed.
I don't know if Islam embraces or condemns someone swearing on the Quran. If it makes Ellison more likely to be honest and hardworking then swear away buddy. Personally I would prefer we eliminate the religious hocus pocus from our politics. If you must use a religious relic then use them correctly. Swearing on Bibles should have no place in the lives of folks who claim to be Christian. Is it too much to ask that anyone sworn into Congress will simply raise their hand and promise to uphold and defend the Constitution?
Quote this article on your site
To create link towards this article on your website,
copy and paste the text below in your page.
Preview :
Swearing on the Quran?
Sunday, 03 December 2006
Sunday, 03 December 2006
Powered by QuoteThis © 2008
Set as favorite
Bookmark
Email This
Hits: 2847
Comments (5)

Bashar
said:
|
Right on I could not agree more with you Mr. Johnson. The past few years of religious fervor that have taken this great country into a dizzying spin of religious hocus pocus and infected every corner of the American society, has been most detrimental to the true American spirits. |
|
wadha
said:
|
quran quran is a pure peaceful book. and when you intend to take an oath with your hands on it, you are commited to your job and words.trust the quran and trust islam...god bless the whole world.. |
|
cb parrish
said:
|
... I heard that one merely holds up one's right hand while being sworn in, no religious tome of any stripe involved. I heard it from a notorious truth-teller, the kind of guy whose yeses are yeses and noes noes. That really IS supposed to be the oath: you don't lie and you keep your word. Not something a little ceremony can enhance. |
|
Susan
said:
|
... The Quakers won't swear at all to tell the truth. They think telling the truth is something you do all the time, not just when you are in court and testifying. They also believe you should never swear to anything, but particularly on a bible. |
|
Lauren
said:
|
... What have our Jewish members of Congress and the Senate sworn on? I am guessing it didn't contain the New Testament. |
|
Write comment

Digg
Del.icio.us
Reddit
Slashdot
Furl
Yahoo
Blogmarks
Technorati
Newsvine
Googlize this
Facebook
Wikio