The consensus opinion not just of the CIA, but also of 15
other US intelligence agencies, is that even if Iran were to decide
tomorrow to start up its nuclear weapons program, it would take until
2015 for the country to produce enough plutonium or enriched U235 to
make even one bomb.
To make their assessment clear, the authors of the latest National
Intelligence Assessment on Iran resorted to boldfaced print to state:
"This NIE does not [italics in original] assume that Iran intends to acquire nuclear weapons."
This document, which was ordered up by Congress, has to be a serious
blow to the plans of Bush and Cheney, who have been gunning for Iran
for several years now, ever since Bush labeled the country part of his
“Axis of Evil.”
Last fall, Bush and Cheney had appeared on the verge of launching an
air assault on Iran’s nuclear research and development complex,
ordering the USS Eisenhower aircraft carrier battle fleet to sea early
following its refueling and refitting at Newport News, in time for it
to join other Naval forces in the Persian Gulf and the Arabian Seas
including the Enterprise carrier group and even a fleet of minesweepers
on the eve of the 2006 elections. That criminal plan, which I wrote
about in the
Nation
at the time, appears to have been blocked by Republican elders and
perhaps senior military brass (who apparently prevailed on former
Secretary of State James Baker, who with former Rep. Lee Hamilton was
heading up the Iraq Study Group, charged with coming up with a way out
of the Iraq quagmire) to pull Bush’s and Cheney’s leash. Baker and
Hamilton had all along vowed not to issue any preliminary hints of
their study group’s conclusions, saying that it would all be released
in January 2007. But suddenly and seemingly inexplicably, they
announced in October that they were going to conclude that the only way
out of Iraq was for the US to begin negotiations with Syria and Iran to
broker a peace in Iraq.
That early report release pulled the rug out of any plan for an Iran attack.
Since then, Bush and Cheney have labored mightily to ratchet up public
fears of Iran’s alleged nuclear ambitions, with Bush most recently
warning of “World War III” if Iran so much as gained the “knowledge” of
how to build nuclear weapons. Naval forces have again been built up,
tankers full of bunker oil and aircraft fuel were dispatched to the
region, and the talk has increasingly been of a US pre-emptive attack
(with the corporate media for the most part playing willing cheerleader
again.
Newsweek
magazine even reported word that Cheney had gone behind the State
Department’s back to importune Israel to attack Iran, so as to provoke
retaliation and thus drag the US into a war (talk about impeachable
treasonout behavior, though
Newsweek didn’t label it as such!).
Republican candidates for the presidential nomination, with the noted
exception of fund-raising giant Rep. Ron Paul, have been trying to
outdo each other in calling for an attack. And on the Democratic side,
Hillary Clinton, ever the tough guy, voted in the Senate to label the
Iranian Revolutionary Guard a “global terrorist organization” — a clear
signal to Bush that it would be okay if he launched attacks on their
bases.
Then came this NIE, like a knife in a hot-air balloon, deflating the whole project.
The embarrassment among the war-mongering would-be presidents of both parties is palpable.
But not so Bush.
While it is clear that he and Cheney have known for several months at
least, and perhaps for years, that their intelligence agencies had
concluded Iran had no nuclear program, and that there was no case for
attacking Iran, Bush is pushing the big lie that he only just saw this
NIE.
Bush is also trying to argue, incredibly, that the NIE is cause for
alarm. A day after release of the report — which Cheney had tried
desperately to alter for the past year, and which the administration
tried unsuccessfully to block from public view — Bush insisted that
Iran is “dangerous,” and claimed, against all logic, that the NIE
should be seen as a “warning signal.” Under questioning from reporters,
he refused to renounce the possible use of force against Iran.
Trying to keep the pressure on, he said, “I think it is very important
for the international community to recognize the fact that if Iran were
to develop the knowledge that they could transfer to a clandestine
program, it would create a danger for the world.”
As a number of scientists have hastened to point out however, that
knowledge is as easy to obtain as the simple hiring of an unemployed
Soviet nuclear physicist — or a quick trip to the library (something
even Bhutan or Burundi could do). It’s not the knowledge of nuclear
weapons that is the danger — it’s a program to build and test a nuclear
device — and as the NIE clearly states, there is no indication that
Iran is planning to start one.
Happily, I do believe that this is checkmate for Bush’s and Cheney’s Iran war plans.
They may still wreak havoc in Iraq. They may try to provoke some kind
of incident with Iran on the border or in the Persian Gulf. They can
still continue with their bankrupting of the US economy, and their
gutting of health and safety and other regulations. They can still
continue their efforts to help their oil industry backers rape the
arctic environment. They can still obstruct efforts to attack climate
change. But they are unlikely to get their way with an air assault and
a new war against Iran.
It may even be fun to watch this pathetic president and his whacked mentor in Blair House try to re-inflate their war balloon.
Maybe, after seven years as the commander in chief of the world’s most
powerful nuclear nation, and before he goes out to pasture (or
impeachment?), Bush will even try learning how to pronounce the word
“nuclear” in an effort to get people to take him seriously.
If that’s even possible.