Home arrow Writings arrow The BBC back-peddles big time – or how to completely rewrite history before the ink’s even dried
The BBC back-peddles big time – or how to completely rewrite history before the ink’s even dried PDF Print E-mail
Written by William Bowles   
Wednesday, 31 October 2007
by William Bowles
Question: When is a Plan not a Plan?
Answer: When the Plan is not a Plan, Plan
The BBC is currently flighting a programme in two parts entitled ‘No Plan, No Peace – the Inside Story of Iraq’s Descent into Chaos’ (28 and 29 October on BBC1). Way back and many times inbetween I have asserted that there was never meant to be a plan (at least in the generally accepted sense of the word) and indeed in 2003, the Bush regime stated that deposing Saddam was never about ‘nation-building’,
59th Battalion‘To make it clear that a post-war U.S. military operation in Iraq is not a nation-building exercise, the Bush Administration should state that the U.S. military will be deployed to Iraq to secure the vital U.S. security interests for which the campaign is undertaken in the first place. Specifically, these war aims should be to:
‘Protect Iraq’s energy infrastructure against internal sabotage or foreign attack to return Iraq to global energy markets and ensure that U.S. and world energy markets have access to its resources.’ – In Post-War Iraq, Use Military Forces to Secure Vital U.S. Interests, Not for Nation-Building by Baker Spring and Jack Spencer. Backgrounder #1589, September 25, 2002 www.heritage.org/Research/MiddleEast/bg1589.cfm%00 (See also Independence Day by William Bowles • Sunday, 4 June, 2006 www.williambowles.info/ini/2006/0606/ini-0419.html)
But just in case you think I’m being very selective in the use of quotes,
“We are not in Iraq to engage in nation-building — our mission is to help Iraqis so that they can build their own nation.” — Donald H. Rumsfeld, Washington Post, September 25 2003.

“The U.S. invasion of Iraq wasn’t part of a nation-building scheme. Ironically, beginning with the First Gulf War and ending with the ouster of Saddam Hussein, U.S. policies interrupted and eventually ended a process of nation building led by Saddam.” www.cato.org/dailys/06-20-04.html (See also ‘Fixing Fallujah – BBC Radio Orwell Reporting for Duty’, 6 November, 2004. www.williambowles.info/ini/ini-0284.html)
There you have it, no plan, no intention of having or implementing a plan, at least as we would understand the meaning of the word. The objective couldn’t be more plain; destroy Iraq’s civil society, turn it into a ‘failed state’, never mind the slaughter of hundreds of thousands of people or the complete obliteration of the most developed economy in the Middle East, with the highest standard of living, a sophisticated health system, and a developed educational infrastructure. That was the Plan, destroy a nation’s critical infrastructure and all you’re left with is a nation in name only, all that matters is that the oil is protected. (It took ten years and 50 billion dollars to rebuild a totally devastated (W) Germany after WWII.)

Of course it’s no coincidence that the BBC spends our hard-earned money rewriting the events of the past four-plus years for it is plain for everyone to see that a not single (stated) objective has been achieved in the ‘liberation’ of Iraq, not even the US or for that matter the UK military have been able to keep their military mouths firmly closed (no doubt for fear of being made the scapegoat let alone the damage it’s doing to what’s left of their esprit).

Thus it was necessary to do some serious damage control as the situation was getting completely out-of-hand; the real intentions, Iraq’s oil and its strategic location were being revealed even by those ‘insiders’ such as Alan Greenspan, former chair of the Federal Reserve,

“I am saddened that it is politically inconvenient to acknowledge what everyone knows: the Iraq war is largely about oil” — Alan Greenspan, September 16, 2007. www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/article2461214.ece
Let’s see what the BBC was saying back in 2004 in those heady, good ol’ days. Under the headline “Fixing the Problem in Fallujah”, the BBC Radio 4’s Website (7 December 2004) told us
“They [the US] swept into Iraq in a short, victorious campaign, and quickly settled down to nation-building and peacekeeping.”
How blasé can the BBC get? Obviously the statement above reveals the BBC’s lies about the ‘lack of a post-invasion plan’ unless of course the BBC invented the entire story? But how could they when the BBC were aware of the first two ‘laws’ passed by the ‘Administrator’ of the newly conquered Iraq, Ober-Gruppen Fuehrer Bremer that disbanded the Iraqi Army and the Ba’ath Party? It’s a quote moreover, that doesn’t appear in Part One (and don’t hold your breath for it to pop up in Part Two).

But back for a mo’ to these two infamous ‘laws’ that ‘Bremer’ passed, the implications of which were well-known at the time. Are we to believe (as the BBC asserted in Part One) that the ‘Plan’ consisted of ‘No Plan’? Of course! Out of chaos was meant to come the oil (remember the ‘No Plan, Plan’ exempted the Oil Ministry from destruction, and predictably, it was the only part of the Iraqi state’s infrastructure that was actually protected from day one).

How can it be that the world’s most powerful nation can spend a dozen years bombing Iraq into submission and in the process exterminate perhaps 1 million people, the majority of them under twenty-five and at the end of it all, not have a Plan when Der Tag arrived?

The US Army has an entire division devoted to carrying out Plans for any country it invades, it’s called the 4th Psychological Operations Group headquartered at Fort Bragg in North Carolina. Below is an excerpt from it’s ‘mission statement’:

59th Battalion“US Army Civil Affairs (CA) Organization “CA units are designed to provide support to both GP and SO forces at the tactical, operational, and strategic levels. The vast majority of army CA forces are in the reserve component (RC). The army’s active component CA unit (96th CA BN, Ft. Bragg, NC) is capable of rapidly deploying one of its five regionally aligned CA companies to meet the initial CA support requirement, with transition to RC units beginning as soon as mobilization permits. The RC civil affairs units have functional specialties, with the unit’s soldiers being assigned to functional teams.

“The functional specialties are:
    • Government Section
    • Legal
    • Public administration
    • Public Education
    • Public Health
    • Public Safety
    • Economic/Commerce Section
    • Economic Development
    • Civilian Suppl
    • Food and Agriculture
    • Public Facilities Section
    • Public Communications
    • Transportation
    • Public Works and Utilities
    • Special Functions Section
    • Cultural Relations
    • Civil Information
    • Dislocated Civilians
    • Emergency Services
    • Environmental Management
It’s critical mission runs as follows:
It supports planning and coordination of CA and foreign nation support operations. The unit provides Civil Affairs functional area specialists in the following areas:

  • Public Administration
  • Dislocated Civilians
  • Civilian Supply
  • Public Communications
  • Public Health
  • Public Work and Utilities” [1]
Duh? Wha’ happened to the fucking Plan man?! There are thousands if not hundreds of thousands of documents detailing every aspect of occupying a foreign country, each aspect handled by specialised sections of the 59th Civil Affairs Battalion, headquartered in Fort Bragg but it has five divisions nationwide. Here’s what it says in part, on the official website of the Civil Affairs Association under the heading of U. S. Army Civil Affairs and Psychological Operations Command we read that,

59th Battalion‘Civil Affairs soldiers are the commander’s link to the civilian population and authorities in an area of operations. In addition to their military training, Civil Affairs soldiers possess skills and experience based on their civilian education and employment in fields such as finance, public safety, public health, and public utilities. With their unique skills they support the commander during combat operations by eliminating burdens or liabilities caused by a local civilian population. Immediately following hostilities Civil Affairs soldiers reconstitute civil authority, and in the longer term help rebuild a viable civilian infrastructure and economy. Civil Affairs supports U. S. national objectives by assisting the government of a host or occupied area to meet its peoples’ needs and maintain a stable and democratic civil administration.’ http://www.civilaffairsassoc.org/USACAPOC.htm
But clearly the invasion of Iraq was no ordinary type of invasion, for example like in WWII, thus there was no need to call in the 59th (except for their Psywar operations, not exactly conducive to nation-building). The invasion of Iraq resembles the Vietnamese Invasion insofar as there was no intention of ‘nation-building’, in fact the exact opposite, for in order to defeat the ‘enemy’ it was necessary to destroy Vietnam (but not to bother rebuilding it afterwards. Remember the concept of ‘nation-building’ hadn’t yet been invented as a rationale for destroying a nation, such pretences were not deemed necessary).

Likewise, there never was any intention of rebuilding Iraq, the contracts for reconstruction worth billions were only for the thieves to divide up between them (courtesy the US and UK taxpayers) with the crumbs that fell off the table distributed between their quislings and cronies in the Iraqi ‘government’.

So why all of a sudden the backpeddling by the media and the rest of the rats deserting what appears to be a sinking ship? I think part of the reason is all the war talk concerning Iran has some of the USUK’s allies and fellow travellers scared shitless that the Armani-suited psychopaths might actually do it! Thus all kinds of ploys are being used to put some distance between themselves and the psychos running things, just in case it all goes completely pear-shaped.

The second reason has to do with the simple fact that the reality that is the war crime called Iraq is blatantly out of sync with all the propaganda that’s been dished out for the past sixteen years, as to the alleged reasons, objectives and results, or lack of in the case of Iraq. So, just as with the dirty ‘dodgy dossier’ deed, the crime had to be massaged into a more acceptable form of fuckup, after all mistakes we can live with but deliberately wiping a country off the face of the map, with or without a ‘Plan’?

Thirdly the allure of the so-called neo-cons seems to be wearing thin, it's all well and good making a big show invading a country already bombed into submission for a dozen years but quite another to take on one that it's in reasonable working order and without having first softened up our domestic populations, and herein lies the rub, for using the same pretext to invade Iran, namely WMDs, is a total PR disaster, even after they threw in all the rubbish about Iranian involvement in bombings in Iraq and Afghanistan.

So it’s ‘Photoshop’ time folks, time to airbrush out all those inconvenient stories about ‘nation-building’ and to recognise all the ‘mistakes’ (like the ‘mistakes’ that were Saddam’s WMDs) that have been made and while we’re at it, conveniently cough up a couple of scapegoats eg, the aforementioned former OGF Bremer. And who better than the BBC to do the airbrushing, they’ve been at it for decades.

Notes

1. ‘The Plot Thickens’ William Bowles 30/04/03 www.williambowles.info/ini/ini-011.html

For more on the PsyOps/PsyWar posse see the following:

U.S. Army Civil Affairs and Psychological Operations www.psywarrior.com/psyop.html

U. S. Army Civil Affairs and Psychological Operations Command www.globalspecialoperations.com/capoc.html

If you want to sign up, visit this site: USACAPOC (A) Retention www.usacapoc.army.mil/retention.aspx or take a look around, it’s all there, how to successfully occupy a foreign country and it includes a handy ‘Terror Threat Alert’ button, currently stuck on “Elevated”.
 
Comments (1)add comment
avatar singh: BBC ia aliar propagan department of the english nation.
bbc is a liar propaganda department of the english nation. it lies even about scotland and wales people =let alone otehr foreiners.
bbc propaganda was at its hieght before ira war to insitagate the war.
1

November 01, 2007

Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote

busy


Did you enjoy this article? Please bookmark it onto:
Digg!Reddit!Del.icio.us!Newsvine!Furl!Fark!Yahoo!Ma.gnolia!Add this social bookmarking functionality to your website! title=

Recommend this article...

 

Related Articles/Posts

< Prev   Next >
Advertise on more
than 70 of the
Internet's Top
Progressive Blogs!




Enter your email address for the Atlantic Free Press Daily Newsletter:

More Author Articles

More Articles...
The end of (capitalist) history?
Thursday, 09 October 2008
William Bowles
(191)
Read more
Climate Change — World War III by Another Name?
Monday, 29 September 2008
William Bowles
(336)
Read more
US invade Pakistan — but no complaints from the ‘international community’
Friday, 19 September 2008
William Bowles
(508)
Read more
Lies, nothing but damn lies and then there’s the mass media…
Sunday, 14 September 2008
William Bowles
(332)
Read more
Lies, nothing but damn lies and then there’s the mass media…
Friday, 12 September 2008
William Bowles
(485)
Read more
Back to the future: “Chaos and instability Washington’s officlal policy line”
Thursday, 11 September 2008
William Bowles
(479)
Read more
Revolution in the high street - Can a revolt of ‘consumers’ spark a revolution?
Thursday, 04 September 2008
William Bowles
(362)
Read more
How’d they do that?
Sunday, 17 August 2008
William Bowles
(441)
Read more
The ‘Empire of Chaos’ or living in the age of impunity - Book Review by William Bowles
Sunday, 17 August 2008
William Bowles
(469)
Read more
Does a leopard change its spots?
Thursday, 14 August 2008
William Bowles
(485)
Read more
Deep in the capitalist doo-doo
Wednesday, 06 August 2008
William Bowles
(531)
Read more
War, war, war or jaw, jaw, jaw?
Thursday, 24 July 2008
William Bowles
(498)
Read more
High Culture — Low Values
Thursday, 24 July 2008
William Bowles
(477)
Read more
Robert Mugabe, yet another man the West loves to hate
Wednesday, 09 July 2008
William Bowles
(673)
Read more
Conflating Inflation — When is a crisis not a crisis? When the BBC says it’s a “slowdown”
Friday, 27 June 2008
William Bowles
(529)
Read more
Why the Left doesn’t get it (Book Review by William Bowles)
Wednesday, 18 June 2008
William Bowles
(938)
Read more
Caught in the glare of history’s headlights
Thursday, 31 January 2008
William Bowles
(1010)
Read more
Chinese Torture’ or what goes around comes around
Sunday, 27 January 2008
William Bowles
(1035)
Read more
Recession? It’s the ‘business cycle’ stupid
Thursday, 24 January 2008
William Bowles
(1096)
Read more
Palestine: Collectively Punished by Israel and Collectively Punished by the media
Wednesday, 23 January 2008
William Bowles
(891)
Read more
The Obama Phenom or revolving door ‘democracy’
Thursday, 10 January 2008
William Bowles
(874)
Read more
It’s all-out war on the planet. Chaos (capitalism) rules okay!
Monday, 07 January 2008
William Bowles
(975)
Read more
Trying to Square the Climate Circle
Sunday, 16 December 2007
William Bowles
(297)
Read more
Trying to Square the Climate Circle
Sunday, 16 December 2007
William Bowles
(900)
Read more
Which way is up?
Monday, 03 December 2007
William Bowles
(1017)
Read more
The nature of the beast - Darling admits 25m records lost
Saturday, 24 November 2007
William Bowles
(1070)
Read more
See no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil
Saturday, 17 November 2007
William Bowles
(1252)
Read more
‘The Geography of Blame’ — Haiti, AIDS and Racism in the Mainstream Media
Sunday, 11 November 2007
William Bowles
(1295)
Read more
Bush’s Tower of Babble
Monday, 05 November 2007
William Bowles
(925)
Read more
A Coup D’etat in Respect?
Monday, 05 November 2007
William Bowles
(847)
Read more
The BBC back-peddles big time – or how to completely rewrite history before the ink’s even dried
Wednesday, 31 October 2007
William Bowles
(1102)
Read more
Iran: The ‘Great Game’ continues only now it’s called ‘The War on Terror’
Thursday, 04 October 2007
William Bowles
(1102)
Read more
The Red and the Green: Part One - Economic Democracy
Thursday, 04 October 2007
William Bowles
(864)
Read more
I’ll huff and I’ll puff and I’ll blow your centrifuges down
Tuesday, 25 September 2007
William Bowles
(1151)
Read more
Blackwaters run deep
Monday, 24 September 2007
William Bowles
(1484)
Read more
Global Cashastrophe
Tuesday, 18 September 2007
William Bowles
(1066)
Read more
Economics 00000001 or the revenge of the Ninjas
Thursday, 13 September 2007
William Bowles
(1061)
Read more
Iraq and Oil — Why the mainstream media won’t talk about it
Monday, 10 September 2007
William Bowles
(1276)
Read more
(Yet More) Rumours of War and other tales from Psy-Ops Central
Monday, 10 September 2007
William Bowles
(1504)
Read more
Who said Marx wasn’t Green?
Tuesday, 04 September 2007
William Bowles
(1313)
Read more
To Nuke or not to Nuke? That is the question
Sunday, 02 September 2007
William Bowles
(1798)
Read more
The BBC’s hall of mirrors
Monday, 27 August 2007
William Bowles
(1384)
Read more
Barbie bites back - Mattel's double whammy
Thursday, 16 August 2007
William Bowles
(1788)
Read more
No Need to Panic, Let the Market Decide
Tuesday, 14 August 2007
William Bowles
(1779)
Read more
Failing to make the right connections
Tuesday, 07 August 2007
William Bowles
(1516)
Read more
Blogopopsicles of the world unite!
Sunday, 05 August 2007
William Bowles
(1406)
Read more
Letter from a far-off galaxy, a tale of two worlds
Wednesday, 01 August 2007
William Bowles
(1307)
Read more
An all-consuming greed
Saturday, 28 July 2007
William Bowles
(1306)
Read more
Total Power Drives you Totally Mad
Wednesday, 18 July 2007
William Bowles
(1444)
Read more
The Media on ‘Global Terror’
Friday, 13 July 2007
William Bowles
(1578)
Read more

Expathos
               No account yet?




Page was generated in 2.519434 seconds

ATLANTIC FREE PRESS IS LOADING. THANK YOU FOR YOUR PATIENCE.