Home     Writers     Op/Ed     Book Reviews     News     Bookstore     Photoshops     Submit     Search     Contact Us     Advertise  
  You are here: 

Fri

20

Jul

2007

From the Pope to Fundies: The self-righteous speak
Friday, 20 July 2007 10:13
by Mel Seesholtz, Ph.D.

The “infallible” pope declared all non-Catholic Christian churches void or defective if they didn’t accept papal authority. A few days later, Bible-waving fundamentalists screeched “Lord Jesus, protect us from this abomination” when Rajan Zed, a Hindu chaplain from Reno, Nevada offered a serene invocation to open a session of the United States Senate.

On July 10, 2007 Benedict XVI authorized a statement that would be appropriate only in the darkest of the Dark Ages, which is pretty much where the pope intends to take “his Church”:

Pope Benedict XVI has reasserted the universal primacy of the Roman Catholic Church, approving a document released Tuesday that says Orthodox churches were defective and that other Christian denominations were not true churches.

Benedict approved a document from his old offices at the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith that restates church teaching on relations with other Christians.

The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith was formerly known as The Holy Office of the Inquisition. It’s former head was Joseph Ratzinger, now Benedict XVI. As Shakespeare asked, “What’s in a name?”

“Fun-da-mental-ists.” They aren’t much “fun.” They’re a rather dour, fire and brimstone lot. Their echoing of the late Jerry Falwell’s “da” notion that the Bible is “absolutely infallible, without error in all matters … such as geography, science, history” makes their mental faculties somewhat more than suspect. But they do make lists of people and beliefs to revile. The fundamentalists whose inquisitional ranting in the Senate gallery on July 12, 2007 made that crystal clear.
Those two fundamentalists may have been the lone protesters in the Senate chamber, but they were not alone in voicing Christianist objection to Mr. Zed’s invocation. Even before Rajan Zed spoke, the founder and chairman of the dominionist American Family Association, Don Wildmon, was issuing one of his hysterical “action alerts”:

Hindu to open Senate with prayer

Send an email to your senator now, expressing your disappointment in the Senate decision to invite a Hindu to open the session with prayer.

On Thursday, a Hindu chaplain from Reno, Nevada, by the name of Rajan Zed is scheduled to deliver the opening prayer in the U.S. Senate. …

WallBuilders president David Barton is questioning why the U.S. government is seeking the invocation of a non-monotheistic god. Barton points out that since Hindus worship multiple gods, the prayer will be completely outside the American paradigm, flying in the face of the American motto "One Nation Under God."

TAKE ACTION – Call your Senators at 202-224-3121

Rajan Zed’s invocation:

“Let us pray,” Zed began, “We meditate on the transcendental glory of the deity supreme, who is inside the heart of the earth, inside the life of the sky and inside the soul of heaven. May he stimulate and illuminate our minds.

“Lead us from the unreal to real, from darkness to light, and from death to immortality. May we be protected together. May we be nourished together. May we work together with great vigor. May our study be enlightening. May no obstacle arise between us.”

Seeking the blessings of god on behalf of and for the Senators, Zed declared, “May the Senators strive constantly to serve the welfare of the world, performing their duties with the welfare of others always in mind. Because by devotion to selfless work one attains the supreme goal of life. May they work carefully and wisely, guided by compassion, and without though for themselves.”

“United your resolve, united your hearts, may your spirits be at one, that you may long dwell in unity and concord!" he added, and ended with, “Peace, peace, peace be unto all.”

Before stepping away from the podium, Zed also said, “And, Lord, we ask you to comfort the family of former First Lady, Lady Bird Johnson,” wife of the former and late President Lyndon Baines Johnson, who died at age 94.

{youtube}EZ9To30Hz7A{/youtube}

What Mr. Zed said would offend no one except religious bigots like Wildmon and the Pope who think they and they alone are right and that they and they alone know “God.” As Barry W. Lynn of Americans United for Separation of Church said, the protest against Zed’s invocation “shows the intolerance of many religious right activists. They say they want more religion in the public square, but it’s clear they mean only their religion.”

Only the ultimate blasphemers – those who pervert spirituality and religion for their own political-financial purposes – could possibly have been offended by Mr. Zed’s invocation. But not surprisingly, Wildmon’s propaganda organ, “One New Now,” featured several.

The “chaplain” of the Family Research Council, another dominionist organization, claimed the “historic Hindu prayer to open the U.S. Senate is ‘just one more step away’ from America’s Christian heritage. The founders of the United States, says Pierre Bynum, would never have wanted a pantheistic prayer to open that legislative body.”

Mr. Bynum claims to know – absolutely – what the founders of this country thought 231 years ago, as well as what they would think and recognize as appropriate now, in the twenty-first century. Mr. Bynum might want to read Jon Meacham’s American Gospel. A pantheistic understanding was very much involved in how “the founders of the United States” saw “God” in pluralistic America. Moreover, as Meacham noted, “In a treaty with the Muslim nation of Tripoli initiated by Washington, completed by John Adams, and ratified by the Senate in 1797, the Founders declared that ‘the government of the United States is not in any sense founded on the Christian religion.”

Another One News Now item – “Former Navy chaplain labels Hindu Senate prayer ‘idolatry’” – featured the comments of Gordon James Klingenschmitt. Bigotry and its arrogant condescension appeared early in the article: “Gordon James Klingenschmitt says when he heard that the Hindu man…” [italics added].

“The Hindu man”? A nameless entity somehow less than a human being because he differs from the beliefs of those in power.

As for “idolatry,” Klingenschmitt might want to have a look at all the statues in Catholic churches, the only “true” Christian domination according to the pope.

As the One News Now article noted, “Klingenschmitt was in the Senate gallery earlier today to witness the prayer being given by the Hindu chaplain – a prayer that was interrupted twice by individuals in the gallery. ‘About 50 feet away from me there were these other Christian people [who] stood up like everybody else ...’” [italics added].

Aside from continuing the no-name denigration of Mr. Zed, the phrasing “other Christian people [who] stood up like everybody else” makes it sound like the whole gallery was filled with protesting “Christians.” In reality, there were only two fanatics and Klingenschmitt, who didn’t join them in their Bible-waving ranting. Perhaps he was too embarrassed by the distasteful display of fanatical religious bigotry, preferring another, less visible way to expressing his.

According to the One News Now article, Klingenschmitt “went to the U.S. Senate in hopes of gaining equal access. … he went to the office of Senator Harry Reid (D-Nevada) office seeking permission to offer a Christian prayer in the Senate at some future date. Not being from Nevada, Klingenschmitt was turned away and directed to the office of one of his senators – Hillary Clinton (D-New York) – whose staff also reportedly declined his request.”

Klingenschmitt wanted “equal time.” How odd, since the Christian Right strongly opposes resurrecting “The Fairness Doctrine” because it would require “equal time.”

Klingenschmitt’s final “thought” reported in the One News Now article is also interesting: “[A]pparently one kind of prayer is permitted and even honored on the floor of the Senate; the other kind of prayer is seen as disruptive.” What’s “disruptive” to twenty-first century America is religious bigots.

But the larger question, as always, is “why?” Why would supposedly spiritual people object to a spiritual leader representing the world’s oldest and third largest religion offering an invocation?

Perhaps they really believe in the anthropocentric, megalomaniacal version of “God” they created in their own image. Or perhaps they’re just using that creation to nurture and exploit people’s fear of others who are different or believe differently. They’re certainly using it to line the coffers of their pro-discrimination organizations and to increase their own political clout.

The brouhaha about Mr. Zed’s invocation highlights, yet again, the bigotry underwriting the Christianist agenda. As for the pope, perhaps he should sell some of his gold miters, luxurious robes, Italian designer shoes and use the money to help feed the hungry and help the poor. That is, after all, what Jesus preached, isn’t it? He could also use some of the money to buy a calendar. It’s 2007, Benedict, not 1007.

 
More from this author:
From Liberating Spirituality to Oppressive Dogma: The Politics of Religion (16441 Hits)
By Mel Seesholtz, Ph.D. Spirituality is intrapersonal. It’s a liberating and uplifting awareness. It nurtures personal growth. It inspires...
Herding the Sheeple, Voting on Justice (18865 Hits)
by Mel Seesholtz, Ph.D. “Let’s vote on it.” To most people that sounds like the ideal way to solve any issue. But it can also...
What’s in a Word: Wal-Mart and the New Jersey Supreme Court (12856 Hits)
By Mel Seesholtz, Ph.D. Hitler’s National Socialist German Workers Party used the Bible and their perversion of Christianity...
Rev. Ted Haggard: “A deceiver and a liar,” exposed (14666 Hits)
By Mel Sheesholtz Ph.D. Once again a self-appointed spokesman for “God” and the leader of a politically active (and lucrative) faith-based...
“Times they are a-changin’…” (8590 Hits)
By Mel Seesholtz, Ph.D. Pennsylvania Republican senator Rick Santorum – Golden Boy of the Christian Right, rabid homophobe, and Bush...
Related Articles:
Why Bush wants immunity from prosecution for war crimes (238385 Hits)
Although not as widely remarked as the elimination of habeas rights and the consecration of torture, the recently passed Senate torture legislation...
More “Culture Wars” Gibberish from nutcase David Brooks (10836 Hits)
Most of us know David Brooks as the balding goofball on “The Jim Lehrer News Hour” who shrugs his shoulders and giggles gleefully whenever...
"Boiling Point" - Eroding Freedom: From John Adams to George W. Bush (12146 Hits)
Put a frog into a pot of boiling water, the well-known parable begins, and out that frog will jump to escape the obvious danger. Put that same...
Mosaic TV - World News from the Middle East (13883 Hits)
Mosaic features selections from daily TV news programs produced by national and regional broadcasters throughout the Middle East....
From Liberating Spirituality to Oppressive Dogma: The Politics of Religion (16441 Hits)
By Mel Seesholtz, Ph.D. Spirituality is intrapersonal. It’s a liberating and uplifting awareness. It nurtures personal growth. It inspires...


Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Trackback(0)
Comments (4)add comment

a guest said:

0
What an amusing diatribe
 
July 21, 2007
Votes: +0

a guest said:

0
...
Whenever people want to make a cheap jibe at the pope, they refer to "papal infallibility". But guess what - Catholics don't actually believe the pope is infallible, i.e. incapable of error. Popes make mistakes. The pope knows that; the Catholic Church knows that. The pope CAN infallibly define dogmas in very limited circumstances (this happens about two or three times a millennium) but otherwise, he can make mistakes.

And duh, he's the pope: of course he believes the Catholic Church is the true church.
 
July 21, 2007
Votes: +0

a guest said:

0
From the Pope to Fundies: The self-righteous speak
Greetings,

As a non-Catholic why do you care what the Pope says? It is important to me as 85% of my country is Catholic and our separation of church and state is not as rigidly enforced as in the industrialized countries. But, you are in the USA where Catholics are a minority and you are free to completely ignore the Pope with impunity.

Lost in Paradise
An American retired in the Philippines
 
July 21, 2007 | url
Votes: +0

a guest said:

0
...
There has been a lot of confusion surrounding the recent document issued by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith regarding the status of Protestant denominations. The document explains that these communities are not churches "in the proper sense of the word." This isn't new. It goes back to the Reformation and was restated in the 2000 document Dominus Jesus.

In Catholic parlance, Protestant denominations are officially "ecclesial communities" and not formal "churches". This means that they are voluntary associations of real Christians.

If you think about it though, Protestant denominations explicitly define themselves as "voluntary associations".
 
July 23, 2007 | url
Votes: +0

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 

adsense

Top