HomeWritings US Troop Death Toll more than 3500 - British Toll at 150 - Immigration Law Defeated by Iraq War (!) - Muqtada Blames US, Rejects Iranian Influence
US Troop Death Toll more than 3500 - British Toll at 150 - Immigration Law Defeated by Iraq War (!) - Muqtada Blames US, Rejects Iranian Influence
There were major car bombings in Sadr City, Rabia (Syrian border) and Ramadi that left dozens wounded and killed. Shiite militiamen attacked Sunni mosques in the Bayaa district of Baghdad, Sunni sources said.
John Edwards disputed the notion that the US is safer since 9/11.
He pointed out that Iraq has become a recruiting ground for a new
generation of anti-American terrorists and that the US is less able to
depend on some allies in the past because of the way Bush has alienated
him. The press is saying that this is a shot across the bow of Hilary
Clinton, who said in Sunday's debate that we are safer than before 9/11
but not yet safe enough.
A majority of Americans rejects the idea that the Iraq War,
at least, has made us safer. 51% say it has not. Some 44% think it has,
amazingly enough. I suspect this is just Dems and Independents versus
Republicans. Anyway, I don't think Senator Clinton was saying the Iraq
War has made us safer (that isn't my implication); she was probably
thinking of the increased FBI/CIA coopeeration, etc.
Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney
said Thursday that the US goal in Iraq should not be a Korea-style
50,000-man military presence for 50 years. He said the US should turn
security quickly over to Iraqis and withdraw to other bases in the
region (presumably Kuwait and Qatar). His understanding that the people
of Iraq and of the Arab world just won't put up with such a big,
long-term US military presence is praiseworthy. In fact, correct me if
I am wrong but this is one of the few references any leading
presidential candidate from either party has made to the aspirations
and feelings of the people of Iraq and of the region! (I know Denis
Kucinich and maybe Ron Paul have done so. I was dismayed on Sunday
night, however, when Senator Clinton tried to blame the Iraqis for the
current quagmire. If someone invaded the US, dissolved the US army,
fired all the capable government bureaucrats, instituted ethnic quota
hiring, rounded up thousands of people and tortured them, etc., the
people of the US might not respond calmly, either.) Romney's critics
complain, however, that he still hasn't said when exactly the US presence would be wound down. If it isn't 50 years, is it 20? 10?
Republican Senators Sam Brownback and Gordon Smith signed on Thursday
to Shiite cleric Abdul Aziz al-Hakim's plans for a Shiite regional
confederacy in southern Iraq, along with a Sunni Arab regional
confederacy that the Sunni Arabs all reject to a man. Why these
Republicans want to deliver southern Iraq and its oil to a Shiite
confederacy that will inevitably be an Iranian sphere of influence is
not entirely clear. This plan will not, by the way, stop the fighting
or bombings. It is rejected not only by virtually all Sunni Arabs but
also by the Sadr Movement among the Shiites, as well as the Islamic
Virtue Party of Basra. Nor does the US actually have any mechanism for
implementing it, since the decision would be that of the Iraqi
parliament (I doubt it could pass there).
But the Bush
administration doesn't want this soft partition of Iraq, so the
defection to the al-Hakim plan is a further sign of insubordination in
the ranks. Most commentators won't notice, but it is Bush's Iraq War
that so weakened his influence with Republic senators and
representatives that he was unable to get his immigration reform law
passed.
Young Shiite nationalist cleric Muqtada al-Sadr gave an interview on Iraqi state television Thursday
in which he condemned the al-Maliki government that his group helped to
bring to power as "neglectful" and "sectarian," and said Iraq's current
problems derive from the US. He also proposed a political coalition of
Iraqi opponents of the Salafi Jihadis or violent Sunni revivalists, who
declare Shiites and secularists "non-Muslims" (such excommunication is
called Takfir). An anti-takfiri alliance of Iraqi Shiites and moderate
Sunnis and secularists might be politically important. He also pledged
never to negotiate directly with the US, and rejected Iranian influence
in Iraq. He also warned Arab states that they had better help Iraq, or its instability would spread to them.
This Reuters article admits that a big Turkish incursion into northern Iraq would be a major headache for the United States.
The tenor of the analysts consulted (why do they not call any
universities, only Washington think tanks?) is, however, that a big
such incursion is unlikely (unless there is a substantial
provocation from the PKK). The problem with this overly optimistic
point of view is that the 5,000 PKK fighters given asylum in Iraqi
Kurdistan are already a huge provocation for the generals in Turkey.
And, they don't seem to remember that the PKK recently set off a big
bomb in Ankara, the Turkish capital, that injured 60 people and killed 6.
If some group based in Cuba had done that to Washington DC, I don't
think the Washington power elite would exercise any restraint in the
reply. Why do they expect the Turkish Pashas to be more mature than
they are?
' BAGHDAD -
At least five people were killed and 15 wounded when a car bomb
exploded near a restaurant in the Shi'ite Sadr City district of
Baghdad, police said. . .
SAMARRA - Five people, including a
policeman, were killed and nine wounded in different incidents around
Samarra, 100 km (62 miles) north of Baghdad . . .
NEAR RAMADI -
At least six people were wounded, including one policeman, in an
attempted attack by a suicide truck bomber on a police checkpoint near
Ramadi, west of Baghdad, police said. Police opened fire and blew up
the truck before it reached its target . . .
MOSUL - A suicide
truck bomber killed nine people and wounded 22, including five British
civilian contractors, in an attack on the police headquarters in Rabea,
a town near the Syrian border, police said. . .
MOSUL - A female
journalist working with the independent Aswat al-Iraq news agency in
the northern Iraqi city of Mosul was killed by gunmen, the agency said.
. . '
McClatchy adds,
"Around 5 pm, two car bombs exploded in Abu Ghraib ( west of Baghdad)
targeting an army check point killing five ( three of them are soldiers
)and injuring 12 ( 6 of them are soldiers) while the rest are
civilians." And, there was this: " Wednesday evening , a roadside bomb
exploded in the downtown of Kirkuk city near the fire brigade
department targeting a police patrol killing one policeman and injuring
three others."
In an "Oh, no!" moment, I thought I was done with the mayhem when I saw this at WaPo:
'
Gunmen also shot three professors from Islamic University in Baghdad,
killing two and wounding one, and killed the head of the Education
Ministry's department of research and development as he drove to work,
police said. "It is part of the campaign to attack every positive thing
in Iraq," said an Education Ministry spokesman, Basil al-Khatib, who
blamed the attacks on extremists who oppose modernity and want to drive
"all elite and educated people from Iraq." He complained that the
national government "is not acting" to prevent further attacks against
teachers, "it only talks." '
Then there was this: '
The U.S. military also reported a major airstrike and ground attack
Tuesday that killed 19 insurgents sheltered in a house near Baqubah,
about 25 miles northeast of the capital . . .' Which made me think back to this.