New Urbanists from all over the land – and as far away as Australia – converged in Philadelphia this past weekend to sort out their gains and losses for the year against the background of a nation punch drunk on "liquidity" and free-floating dread. The city of Philadelphia looked perkier than anyone could remember – at least the square mile emanating in a quadrant roughly southeast from William Penn's statue atop city hall to the burnished alleys of 18th century Society Hill. At lunch hour Rittenhouse Square was full of young cubicle critters seeking air and light, and six hours later the bars were doing a brisk business in twelve-dollar martinis.
The Congress for the New Urbanism (CNU) was formed in 1993 by a cadre of revolutionary architects who had decided that enough was enough with a nation bent on committing suicide by strip mall. From the start, their mission was bold, coherent, and heroic: to present a clear alternative to the mindless devouring juggernaut of suburbia.
Also from the start, they were accused of being "elitists," "un-American," "enemies-of-art-and-free-expression," "snooty enablers of white yuppie separatists," "footlings of the Neo-cons," and "sentimental saps" – all for suggesting that perhaps human beings might benefit from living in places worth caring about.
The New Urbanists became known mostly for the real estate
ventures that were produced in their name – first the iconic "new town"
Seaside, Florida, and then scores of other projects based on what they
called the Traditional Neighborhood Development (TND). Some of these
projects were badly compromised by the zoning boards who ruled on their
details. Some were wannabes and co-opted rip-offs. Some, like Vincent
Graham's I'On project in Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, achieved high
levels of artistry despite the obstacles thrown up by the mental
defectives who opposed them..
The New Urbanists were equally
active in the existing cities, leading in the adaptive re-use of
industrial ruins, brownfields, and whole districts that had been
written off as hopeless beyond the pale. Figures like Mark Nikita and
Dorian Moore, who worked in the rough context of downtown Detroit, and
Ray Gindroz of Pittsburgh who pioneered the conversion of reviled and
decrepit public housing all over the country into places where a human
spirit might rediscover itself.
The greatest achievement of the
New Urbanists in these years was not the long list of TNDs or the urban
interventions that saved whole districts, but in the retrieval of
knowledge and principle that had been thrown away by a hapless and
craven officialdom of planning – abetted by the mandarin ideologues who
ruled the university architecture schools, and who were dedicated above
all to defending the antisocial prerogatives of their jive-narcissism.
Despite all that, the New Urbanists worked doggedly to reconstruct a
body of culture (i.e. urban design). They processed it in a series of
brilliantly clear manuals like the Transect and the Smart Code, and
gave everyone from the carpenters to the bankers a lexicon for
understanding the difference between plain crap and stuff with a
plausible future.
The New Urbanists came on the scene just as
the final exuberant phase of the cheap oil fiesta was getting underway
– meaning the climactic phase of American suburban expansion. They
positioned themselves as a minority opposition to the "conventional"
developers who utterly dominated the landscape. The things that were
built under the New Urbanist name represented probably less than two
percent of everything built since 1990. The work they did occurred as a
valiant swimming against the tide – or, more specifically, against a
huge blast of reeking, toxic entropy.
The final blowout of cheap
oil is now ending, and the suburban juggernaut is entering its death
throes. It wasn't slain by the New Urbanists, but they will be the last
ones standing – just as the little warm-blooded mammals were the last
creatures standing when the dinosaurs expired in the warm Cretaceous
mud. The focus of their work will certainly have to change. There will
be no more suburban subdivisions (or the accessories and furnishings of
them – the strip malls, Big Box pods, and fried-food out-parcels), and
the TND will emerge not as a counterpoint to all that crap, but as the
template for a redefined type of village or town scaled to the new
realities of available energy.
We will be inhabiting the terrain
differently from now on. Whatever intact farmland remains will have to
be reserved for feeding ourselves, and the "countryside" that has been
regarded as having only scenic or recreational value for so many
decades, will have to be both productive and carefully tended by human
hands. Our big cities will certainly shrink, contract, and the
fortunate ones will redevelop and re-densify at their old cores and
around their waterfronts. The part of Philadelphia that we were in last
weekend may be about as big as a sustainable city can get – minus the
skyscrapers, which, alas, will be obsolete.
The demographic
shift to come will be a shocking reversal of what has been going on
since the start of the industrial revolution. The small towns and small
cities of America – the places that have moldered in desolation and
squalor for decades – will be coming back to life, surrounded by an
agricultural landscape shaped by human attention.
What we'll
need in this process will be the most valuable things that the New
Urbanists recovered along the way: the knowledge required to create a
human dwelling place with a future. That was really the extent of their
ambitions all along. But it was too straightforward for a twisted
culture to understand. In a few years, even the mental defectives and
the professional jive-narcissists will understand where we've been and
where we are going.
Have you been to South Florida lately to see the crap that is being constructed by developers, city commissions and planners under the influence of New Urbanism? The new urbanists have "won", sort of. The fuzzy logic - partial understanding of the Smart Code is now justifying prison compounds without any on-site or nearby civic amenities. New Urbanist MUST start to put forward QUALITY standards to augment the principles. Without the standards, the single family home by horrible developers is a better way of living since the homeowner has some a capacity to enhance the building, landscape and community.
Be careful, your dream may be a nightmare.
Glenn Weiss Delray Beach, Florida gw@glennweiss dot com www dot artsjournal dot com / aestheticgrounds See my Feb 22, 2007 Blog: New Urbanism Kills Itself And link to the "Visual Essays" for the presentation I made in Australia last year.
Are they properly "jive-narcissists" or "jive-ass narcissists"?
And another: Does Buckminster Fuller fit into this thinking or is he considered outre, as in some sort of a relic? Sometimes I think I'm the only person in the world who ever read Critical Path and especially Chapter 3: Legally Piggily. I mean, I know I'm NOT the only person in the world who read that, but, talking to others, sometimes I feel as if I were. I mean, you know what I mean, man? I mean it.
2
May 22, 2007
Write comment
Did you enjoy this article? Please bookmark it onto: