Like the Titanic the Bush Administration is foundering. The latest rat heading overboard is former CIA chief George Tenet, who abandons for good the Bush Administration's Ship of Fools and enters the water as another former administration official prepared to come clean on how the Bushies tried and generally succeeded in cooking the intelligence. Oh yeah. He's selling a book.
You probably cannot tell but I am outraged by this Johnny-come-lately jerk off who will assuage his guilt by dishing the dirt on what the Bush Administration really knew as he rakes in book royalties. My friend, Brent Budowsky, also is not a happy camper.
Tenet will start spilling his guts Sunday night on Sixty Minutes, which kicks off his publicity tour to hawk his book. But we don't have to wait till Sunday because David Ignatius offered an early preview last Sunday during an interview with Chris Matthews. Ignatius said that the book is:
...going be very tough. George Tenet has been doing a slow burn ever since he left the CIA. He's been angrier and angrier as he saw himself being essentially made the fall guy on WMD in Iraq. And he's gonna come back saying he and his agency, the CIA, were pushed, again and again, by Cheney and Cheney's people to give him the answers that they wanted. And he's got chapter and verse on that."
He added: "He will tell a story that I think will make people's hair curl. But he's been waiting a long time to tell this....And he'll also say—-this is a very important part of this—-that, on the question of what would happen in Iraq after the invasion, the CIA pretty consistently warned, 'You have trouble ahead. You will not be able to unite this country. Sunnis and Shiites are gonna be 'at daggers.
Sorry George. Too little and
way too damn late. You had ample opportunity to blow the whistle on the
Bush bullshit but you played ball. I do not give a damn whether you did
or did not say the case for war was a "slam dunk". You signed off on
Colin Powell's presentation to the United Nations. You, more than any
other U.S. Government senior official, were in the unique position to
know that the Secretary of State was selling a pack of lies. And you
sat behind him nodding affirmatively like a bobblehead doll.
You were asleep at the switch in January of 2003 as the Bush
Administration pushed and cajoled analysts and managers to let them
make the bogus claim that Iraq was on the verge of getting its hands on
uranium. You said nothing until your July 11, 2003 statement, which concluded with the following:
Portions of the State of the Union speech draft came to the CIA for
comment shortly before the speech was given. Various parts were shared
with cognizant elements of the Agency for review. Although the
documents related to the alleged Niger-Iraqi uranium deal had not yet
been determined to be forgeries, officials who were reviewing the draft
remarks on uranium raised several concerns about the fragmentary nature
of the intelligence with National Security Council colleagues. Some of
the language was changed. From what we know now, Agency officials in
the end concurred that the text in the speech was factually correct —
i.e. that the British government report said that Iraq sought uranium
from Africa. This should not have been the test for clearing a
Presidential address. This did not rise to the level of certainty which
should be required for Presidential speeches, and CIA should have
ensured that it was removed.
You were the Alberto Gonzalez of the intelligence community—a grotesque
mixture of stupidity, incompetence shielded by a genial personality.
Decisions were made, you were in charge, but you have no idea how
decisions were made even though you were in charge. Curiously, if
Ignatius is correct, you focus your anger on the likes of Dick Cheney,
Don Rumsfeld, and Condi Rice but you leave George W. out of the line of
fire. If that is true you are a genuine coward.
This is not a case of Monday morning quarter-backing. You demonstrated
in October of 2002 that you understood the game when you called the
White House and stopped the President from using a speech in Cincinnati
to make the case that Iraq was buying uranium. Somewhere between
October 2002 and January 2003 you rolled over and decided to play ball.
You could have gone to Senator Rockefeller or Senator Daschle or
Congresswoman Harman or any number of legislators and briefed them on
the truth. But you remained quiet. By your silence you helped build the
case for war. You betrayed the CIA officers who collected the
intelligence that made it clear that Saddam did not pose an imminent
threat. You betrayed the analysts who tried to withstand the pressure
applied by Cheney and Rumsfeld. You betrayed the CIA itself by allowing
active duty employees like Michael Scheur to write books critical of
Bush, which contributed to the perception that the CIA was a
politicized gang eager to embarrass the Bush Administration.
Most importantly and tragically, you betrayed your country. Instead of
resigning in protest you provided the Bush Administration the pretext
of respectability and became the scapegoat for their misdeeds. Your
silence contributed to the willingness of the public to support the
disastrous war in Iraq which has killed more than 3000 Americans and
hundreds of thousands of Iraqis.
So now you are going to correct the record with your book? Not so fast
George. Why don't you start by returning the Medal of Freedom hung
around your neck by George W. in December 2004? Bush claimed you
received the award because you:
played pivotal roles in great events, and [your] efforts have made our
country more secure and advanced the cause of human liberty.
The reality of Iraq demonstrates that fruits of your efforts have in
fact made our country less secure. The damage to the credibility of the
CIA is serious but can eventually be repaired. The U.S. soldiers who
died or have been maimed in the streets of Fallujah and Baghdad cannot
be fixed. The dead have passed into history. Many of the wounded will
live the rest of their lives missing limbs, blinded, mentally disabled,
and physically disfigured. I second Brent Budowsky's suggestion—if you
have any shred of decency left you should dedicate the proceeds of your
book to the veterans and their families who are paying the price for
your failure to speak up when you could have made a difference. That
would be the decent thing to do.