Invisible in the smoke screen of civil war in Iraq, the current US
ambassador to Iraq Zalmay Khalilzad has been working feverishly on
Iraq’s first post-invasion Hydrocarbon Law.
The fancy name not withstanding, the law is simply about Iraq’s 112
billion barrels of proven, close to the surface and easily extractable
oil reserves, the second largest in the world after Saudi Arabia, along
with roughly 220 billion barrels of other probable and possible
resources. Add to this another fact of equal importance. Iraq’s true
potential is said to be far greater than this as the country has
remained relatively unexplored due to years of war and sanctions.
The above mentioned two facts alone require an on-station presence of
decades of some if not all four of the western oil giants i.e. Exxon,
Chevron, Shell and BP.
Simple thus far, eh? Let us proceed onwards.
Khalilzad’s untiring efforts were rewarded recently by the passing of
the proposed law by the puppet Iraqi government. The lolly in the law
is hidden in some of its
provisions
that are said to be a “radical departure from the norm for developing
countries”. And that is that under the new law oil majors such as BP
and Shell in Britain, and Exxon and Chevron in the US, would be able to
sign deals of up to 30 years to extract Iraq’s oil, a kind of contract
which other oil producing countries do not want to touch by a mile long
pole.
Zalmay Khalilzad is an interesting character. One recalls that
Khalilzad was once an advisor to Unocal (Union Oil Company of
California). A diehard Neocon, he keeps getting sent to places where
the oil scent is up in the air. He was appointed as a
special envoy to Afghanistan immediately after the invasion and occupation of that country along with another ex-employee of Unocal,
Hamid Karzai. Karzai, though, made it to the President of that same country.
Together they drew up a risk analysis of a proposed gas pipeline from
the former Soviet republic of Turkmenistan across Afghanistan and
Pakistan to the Indian Ocean. Previously too Khalilzad had participated
in similar talks between Unocal and Taliban officials in 1997. What is
relatively unknown is that while that project remained a ‘pipe dream’,
Unocal quietly
merged with Chevron Corporation on August 10, 2005, and became a wholly owned subsidiary.
So the gist of the story so far is that Iraq’s Hydrocarbon Law, passed
recently by a weak Iraqi government, gives long term concessions to
Western oil giants, among them not just Khalilzad’s but many Neocons’
former employers. These oil giants, however, cannot operate on their
own in Iraq and need protection from ‘overzealous’ national and
regional forces that tend to unbalance the gravy train.
That brings us to Anwaar’s First Universal Law of Hydrocarbon. It
states, “Hydrocarbon at rest tends to stay at rest and Hydrocarbon in
motion tends to stay in motion with the same speed and in the same
direction unless acted upon by unbalancing forces.”
Something clearly needed to be done regarding the unbalancing forces.
Now
here
is a map of Iraq oil fields turned over by the Commerce Department,
under a March 5, 2002 court order as a result of Judicial Watch’s
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit concerning the activities of
the Dick Cheney’s Energy Task Force. (Click
here for another map if the earlier link does not work).
And
here
is an interactive map of the dozen or so permanent American military
bases coming up in Iraq with billions of dollars of US tax payers’
money. As of mid-2005, the U.S. military had 106 forward operating
bases in Iraq, including what the Pentagon calls 14 “enduring” bases
(twelve of which are located on the map) – all of which are to be
consolidated into four mega-bases.
Please juxtapose Iraq’s oil map with that of the upcoming permanent
American military bases, keep in mind the 30 years provision of Iraq’s
Hydrocarbon law, tie it in with the other little fact of these bases
being called ‘enduring’ military bases by Pentagon and try calculating
a time frame for American forces’ withdrawal from Iraq.
Still not there? Ok here is one more modest piece of information that
would surely lead the reader in the correct direction. And that is the
little matter of the construction of the largest embassy of any country
in any country the world has ever seen.
America’s largest existing embassy, covering 10 acres and consisting of
five buildings, is in the world’s most populous nation China. With a
population of around 25 million, Iraq’s headcount is just twice that of
the state of Illinois. However, this
fortress-like compound
rising beside the Tigris River will be the largest of its kind in the
world, “the size of Vatican City, with the population of a small town,
its own defense force, self-contained power and water, and a precarious
perch at the heart of Iraq’s turbulent future.”
The designs aren’t publicly available, but the embassy is rumored to be
a self-sufficient and “hardened” domain able to house a staff of 8000
people, having its own water wells, electricity plant,
wastewater-treatment facility, twenty-one building including two major
diplomatic office buildings, homes for the ambassador and his deputy,
apartment buildings for staff, a swimming pool, gym, commissary, food
court and an American Club.
The
embassy’s 104-acre parcel
is “six times larger than the United Nations’ compound in New York and
two-thirds the acreage of the Mall in Washington. Protected by 15ft
thick walls, its security, overseen by U.S. Marines, will be
extraordinary with setbacks and perimeter no-go areas that will be
especially deep structures reinforced to 2.5-times the standard, and
five high-security entrances, plus an emergency entrance-exit.”
Doesn’t look like the Americans are going any where any time too soon…not to the scribe at least.
The Iraqi Vice President Tareq al-Hashemi needs to be reminded of
Anwaar’s First Universal Law of Hydrocarbon. The invaders knew that all
along but chose not to inform the gullible Iraqi Veep.
Thirty years are the minimum that are required to ensure that most of
Iraq’s Hydrocarbon, if not to the last drop, stays in motion with the
same speed and in the same direction wherefrom came the invasion
without being acted upon by unbalancing forces. The Barak Obamas, the
Kucinichs, and the Nancy Pelosis of this world can climb the nearest
trees, their public chest beating on the issue not withstanding. They
all work for the same employers any way.
Any one out there that thinks otherwise?