(This is hubris indeed, given that Churchill is the tutelary god of the
neocons and all the other militarists of the American Empire crowd.
Indeed,
the Claremont Institute – yet another extremist pressure group on the war-whooping Right – has just announced it is
giving its Statesmanship Award to none other th

an that eminent ex-statesman and
certified slaughterer of civilians,
Donald Rumsfeld, at the Institute's annual dinner in honor of – who
else? – Winston Churchill. The Claremont Institute is of course devoted
to restoring "the principles of the American Founding to their
rightful, preeminent authority in our national life." However, the
Institute's view of these principles may differ slightly from that of
the Founders themselves – a saucy crew largely made up of questioning,
doubting, agnostic, non-blinkered secularists. For example, one of the
Institute's most prominent board members is
Howard Ahmanson Jr., the rightwing moneybags who for many years was the principal funder of the
"Christian Reconstructionist" movement. This movement, many of whose adherents and allies now have ready access to the corridors of power and
exercise great influence
on the formation of government policy, advocates the imposition of a
totalitarian theocratic state, with every aspect of public and private
life governed by a Sharia-like blanket of religious law. Some of the
fearsome strictures openly championed by the Reconstructionists include
slavery for the poor who fall into debt, execution
– by stoning -- for homosexuals and other transgressors, revocation of citizenship for non-believers, and
a worldwide jihad to
exert God's dominion over the globe. Bush, of course, is very much at
home with such lumpish, grunting, primitive minds; but one suspects
that Churchill – much less Jefferson, Madison and Franklin -- would
find a dinner with these cretins pretty heavy going.)
But aside from the fascinating – if sick-making – spectacle afforded by
Bush's neocon chowdown, Greenwald cuts to the deeper meaning of the
event: we're doomed. The bloodthirsty baying of these servile ministers
is the only voice that Bush attends to. Witness the "surge" in Iraq,
launched in arrogant defiance not only of the will of the American
people (neither party pays any attention to that) but also of a broad
swathe of the Establishment elite, including the faction of Bush's own
father. Instead,
Bush turned to Frederick Kagan
-- yet another well-wadded neocon courtier with absolutely no expertise
in the Middle East, no knowledge of Iraq, no military experience, no
qualifications at all save for his adherence to militarism, empire and
the inherent greatness of George W. Bush. Bush will follow their
lunatic agenda of "creative destruction" and imperial conquest to the
end – because it is his agenda. Greenwald's conclusion is grim, but all
too true:
Irving Kristol [husband of luncheon attendee Gertrude Himmelfarb] has
written in the past
about the need to exploit religious and moral concepts in order to
manipulate the masses, and his intellectual North Star, Leo Strauss,
has advocated -- as Strauss scholar
Shadia Drury documented
-- that "those in power must invent noble lies and pious frauds to keep
the people in the stupor for which they are supremely fit" -- a view
Kristol has endorsed. One can see that dynamic powerfully at work in
the interaction between these neoconservatives and the President. They
have seized upon the President's evangelical fervor and equated his
"calling" to wage war for Good in the world with the neoconservative
agenda of endless wars in the Middle East.
And the more
unpopular the President becomes as a result, the more of a failure
these policies are, the more strongly they tell him to ignore all of
that, that none of it matters, that his God and history will conclude
that he did The Right Thing, provided that he continues steadfastly to
pursue their agenda. And the President believes that. That is why
nothing will stop him in pursuing the path he created years ago when,
in January, 2002, he became convinced to name not only Iraq, but also
Iran, as standing members of the "Axis of Evil" (even though our
relations with Iran were rapidly improving at the time) and cited the
9/11 attacks in order to all but vow war on those countries, despite
their having nothing to do with those attacks. The President's
"lessons" at the feet of neoconservatives continue, and he is as
faithful a student as ever.