Even if it were possible to know how many innocent
civilians have been needlessly murdered, it wouldn't matter. Because
America's leaders don't know and they don't care. As General Colin
Powell, then Chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, retorted to an
April 1991 question about Iraqi casualties — "That's not really a
number I'm terribly interested in." And, following the assault on
Afghanistan, General Tommy Franks, CENTCOM commander and architect of
both the Afghanistan and Iraqi killing sprees, quipped at a March 2002
news conference at Bagram Air Base — "We don't do body counts."
Even President George Bush, the commander-in-chief — the Energizer
Bunny Decider — pleaded ignorance and apathy when asked on Dec. 12,
2005 about the
number of iraqi civilians
slain since the March 2003 invasion. "How many Iraqi civilians have
died...in this war?" he asked. "Um...I would say about 30,000 — more or
less..."
Reporters in the room knew that more than a year before, the British medical journal,
The Lancet,
had reported for the period March 2003 - Sept. 2004, an excess
mortality of nearly 100,000 civilian deaths. Yet none dared challenge
Bush then nor in October 2006 when the journal released
an indepth study that an estimated 655,000 Iraqis had died since the invasion, with more than 600,000 due to violence.
Is Politics really more important than life? Of course, when you
consider the gandy-dancing, moon-walking and flip-flopping that's gone
on within the political axis — the administration, the Congress and the
media — since the November elections. If there were doubts that this
axis considers the nation's military anything more than "dumb, stupid
animals to be used as pawns for foreign policy," the spectacle that has
unfolded since Bush was backed into a corner with the release of the
James Baker/Les Hamilton
Iraq Study Group (ISG) report
put them to rest. Its 84 pages boiled down to one sentence in the
Executive Summary — "The United States has long-term relationships and
interests at stake in the Middle East, and needs to stay engaged,"
which was another way of telling Bush not to cut and run until the oil
law was passed which will legalize US corporate plunder of Iraq's oil
fields via 35-year contracts.
The ISG was nine months in
the making, March through October 2006, during which time 556 coalition
"troops" were killed — 515 of them American. For political reasons,
Baker and Hamilton waited until after the election to release it,
hardly noticing that 77 servicemen and women were killed in November.
On Dec. 13, when Bush tossed the report on the table with the rest of
the options and announced he'd make his decision after Christmas, US
casualties stood at 2,937. On Christmas Day, when he bowed his head to
thank God for making him The Decider, 2,975 Americans would never open
another present.
The overwhelming vote in November 2006 was a national demand to stop
the war. Bush responded in January 2007 by announcing not only that he
was staying the course, but that he was "surging" an additional 21,500
military in a "New Way Forward" plan. Since that time, with the surge
underway, Democrats and Republicans have sparred in a shameful display
of shadow-boxing oratory and endless debates on debates, resulting in a
single limp, non-binding resolution designed to do little more than
give political cover to those voting for it. With the surge nearly
complete, House Democrats now say they're working on a plan to restrict
Bush's ability to wage war, with the stipulation, of course, that he
can continue to kill if he "publicly justifies" his position.
With cruel indifference this pack of werewolves, led by a creature who
deserted his post in a time of war, continue to fund a surge they claim
they are against while shouting, "Support the troops!" They neither
know nor care that, above all things, support means full force
protection — sufficient training, proper equipment — and medical care
for those who return broken in body, mind and spirit.
Like their more than 650,000 Iraqi counterparts, the
3,185
US victims of the Iraqi inferno have no individual form or substance in
the minds of the general public — certainly not in those of the media
or the Congress. One is merely "collateral damage," the other a heap of
body bags labeled "troops." Senators John McCain and Barack Obama were
exactly right when they said that so many lives in this illegal war
have been "wasted," rather than sacrificed. Victims of this war — Iraqi
and American — are little more than debris scattered in the wake of the
werewolves' lust to dominate the world and control its resources.
They are, as described so eloquently by Iraq's Layla Anwar — "lost faces in the dust."
Sheila
Samples is an Oklahoma writer and a former civilian US Army Public
Information Officer. She is a regular contributor for a variety of
Internet sites. Contact her at rsamples@sirinet.net