The First Line of Defense of the Empire is the Local Client President - The First Line of Opposition to Bush is to Defeat this Local Client ‘President’!
Para Mate Amargo:
Bush Versus Chavez: El Pueblo y Chavez contra los Presidentes
Cipayos y el Emperador
President Bush’s visit to Uruguay, Brazil , Colombia, Peru and Mexico reflects the ‘two tracks’ of US empire-building – military intervention and political-diplomatic instruments.
Bush’s visit to Latin America at this time is an attempt to gain support from client electoral rulers at a time when he has lost the support of over 75% of US public opinion, and is rejected by overwhelming majorities in Europe, the Middle East, Asia and Africa. Bush’s advisers and principal propagandists are counting on publicizing the friendly receptions by Lula, Vazquez, Uribe, Garcia and Calderon to counter the reality and public image of Bush as a mass murderer of the Iraqi and Afghani people.
Bush’s escalation of the war against Iraq and threat to bomb Iran has further marked his regime as the deadly enemy of humanity. When electoral politicians like Tabare Vazquez and Lula Da Silva embrace Bush, they provide a decorative mask to an imperial monster who has been exposed as the principal enemy of Latin America’s foremost anti-imperialist President Hugo Chavez.
Bush’s turn to a diplomatic approach toward consolidating imperial power in Latin America is the result of the failures and defeats of his military policies. The US attempt to conquer Iraq and Afghanistan by military force has failed: the resistance is stronger than ever.
The US invasion of Haiti and the overthrow of the elected President Aristide has failed to defeat mass popular resistance. Washington's control over Haiti depends on the mercenary armies and officials of its client rulers in Uruguay, Brazil, Chile, Argentina, Peru and Bolivia.
The Bush regime’s effort to overthrow President Chavez has
suffered several major defeats. The mass urban uprising of April 2002
defeated the US backed coup. From December 2002 through January 2003
the Venezuelan workers and the Chavez government defeated the bosses’
lockout of the petroleum industry, which had been backed by US oil
companies and Washington. The great majority of popular classes
defeated the US-financed referendum to impeach Chavez in 2004.
With each failed effort, the prestige of Bush declined while Chavez
gained the admiration of the vast majority of Latin America people. The
‘Chavez model’ of a generous social welfare state, a mixed economy
based on a strong state sector, and direct democracy via neighborhood
assemblies stood in stark contrast to the failed regressive and
stagnant neo-liberal models in the rest of Latin America.
Moreover Chavez’ generous sale of oil at subsidized prices to the poor
countries of the Caribbean, Central and South America undermined the
appeal of rapacious US ‘free trade’ policies in the region. Venezuela’s
extensive trade and investment agreements with Argentina, Brazil,
Bolivia, Ecuador and Colombia attracted support from sectors of the
‘national bourgeoisie’ and weakened US efforts to isolate the Chavez
government.
In the Great Contest between Chavez and Bush, between national-popular
welfare initiatives and the reactionary regressive neo-liberal status
quo, there is no question that Chavez is winning and the US is losing
influence. Bush’s visit to Latin American is an effort to recoup
declining imperial influence by consolidating ties with both the
rightist client regimes (Garcia in Peru and Calderon in Mexico) and the
pseudo ‘center-left’ neo-liberal regimes of Vazquez and Lula. The
purpose is to integrate these client regimes into the US economic and
diplomatic orbit and to construct an anti-Chavez coalition. Given that
Bush has no popular support in Latin America, he will only meet with
client rulers behind closed doors with heavy security protecting him.
Parallel to Bush’s visit, President Chavez will visit Argentina where
tens of thousands of people will attend a mass public meeting to
welcome him. The Chavez-Bush visits reflect the profound polarization
in Latin America, in which the vast majority of the people and a few
governments stand with Chavez while corrupt and discredited
‘ex-leftists’ embrace the emperor. Washington’s clients, Vazquez, Lula,
and Calderon will answer to their people who demonstrate in the streets
that the governments who welcome Bush do no represent their opinions or
interests. No government can claim to be ‘progressive’ which welcomes
and signs military base and free trade agreements with the worst
imperial President in US history.
The future of Uruguay and Brazil will not be determined by the
‘vende-patria’ agreements signed by the Presidents behind the closed
doors of presidential palaces, but by the huge bellicose parliaments of
the streets who demonstrate their repudiation of Bush and who affirm
their anti-imperialist principles.
Writings 
Subscribe to this comment's feed
