<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Who is more guilty of monumental war crimes - the prime-movers or trigger pullers?</title>
		<description>Comments for Who is more guilty of monumental war crimes - the prime-movers or trigger pullers? at http://atlanticfreepress.com , comment 1 to 1 out of 1 comments</description>
		<link>http://atlanticfreepress.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:32:22 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Eustace Mullins had long ago laid it out</title>
			<link>http://atlanticfreepress.com/news/1/9149-who-is-more-guilty-of-monumental-war-crimes-the-prime-movers-or-trigger-pullers.html#comment-7781</link>
			<description>Iconoclast Eustace Mullins had spelled out over two dozen years ago some of the legalise which is already on the American Law Books that could be used by a courageous and patriotic people to indict the real murderers of humanity who continually mastermind from behind the scenes the [b]&quot;kill[ing] in large numbers and to the sound of trumpets&quot;.[/b]

Why is this phenomenal book, as the author's previous seminal 'Secrets of the Federal Reserve', now over 50 years old, ignored by Bugliosi, Turley, Velvel, their predecessors, the 'rebel' lawmakers, and the alternate newsmedia to help them get to the real prime-movers of crimes against humanity? After all the 'labeling' vilification has been processed, the two most precious treasures of the American goyem, poet-philosopher Ezra Pound and detective-scholar Eustace Mullins, have been entirely lost to them. But it is surprising that it is also lost to the rebellious thinking minds!

The following rendering of Socrates' famous admonition from the book's Preface is still an open invitation:

[b]“Agree with me if I seem to you to speak the truth; or, if not, withstand me might and main that I may not deceive you as well as myself in my desire, and like the bee leave my sting in you before I die. And now let us proceed.”
[/b]

 
 
[b]THE WORLD ORDER
A Study in the Hegemony of Parasitism
by Eustace Mullins Copyright 1985[/b]
First Edition
Library of Congress Catalog Card No. 84-082357
PDF available online.


Pages 276 - 280

Despite its present hegemony, the World Order of parasitism realizes
that it is always subject to being dislodged, which, in effect, would mean its
destruction. Therefore, it is necessary to control not only the channels of
communication of the host, but his very thought processes as well; to
maintain constant vigilance that the host does not develop any concept of the
danger of his situation, or any power to throw off the parasite. Therefore, the
parasite carefully instructs the host that he exists only because of the “benign”
presence of the parasite – that he owes everything to the presence of the
parasite, his religion, his social order, his monetary system, and his educational
svstem. The parasite deliberately inculcates in the host the fear that if the
parasite happens to be dislodged, the host will lose all these things, and be left
with nothing.
Although the World Order has control of the legal system and the
courts, it remains vulnerable to any enforcement of the pre-existing body of
law which the host had formulated to protect his society. This body of law
forbids everything that the parasite is doing, and forces the parasite to
maintain a precarious existence outside of the law. It the law were to be
enforced at any time, the parasite would be dislodged. The existing body of
law clearly forbids the operation of criminal syndicates, which is precisely
what the hegemony of parasitism and its World Order is. Criminal
syndicalism denies the equal protection of the law to citizens. Only by acting
against criminal syndicalism can the state protect its citizens.
Corpus Juris Secundum 16: Constitutional Law 213 (10) states : “The
Constitutional guaranty of freedom of speech does not include the right to
advocate, or conspire to effect, the violent destruction or overthrow of the
government or the criminal destruction of property. 214 : The Constitutional
guaranty of the right of assembly was never intended as a license for illegality
or invitation for fraud – the right of freedom of assembly may be abused by
using assembly to incite violence and crime, and the people through their
legislatures may protect themselves against the abuse.”
The assembly of any World Order organization, such as the Council on
Foreign Relations or any foundation, is subject to the laws against fraud (their
charters claim they are engaged in philanthropy), and enforcement of the laws
against criminal syndicalism would end the institutions through which the
World Order illegally rules the people of the United States, the illegal
conspiracies and the introduction of alien laws into our system by the
foundations instructions to Congress.
We have already shown that the Rockefeller Foundation and other key
organizations of the World Order are “Syndicates”, which are engaged in the
practice of criminal syndicalism. But what is a “syndicate”? The Oxford
English Dictionary notes that the word stems from “syndic”. A syndic is
defined as “an officer of government, a chief magistrate, a deputy”. In 1601
R. Johnson wrote in Kingd and commonw “especiall men, called Syndiques,
who have the managing of the whole commonwealth.” Thus the Rockefeller
Foundation and its associated groups are carrying out their delegated function
of managing the entire commonwealth, but not for the benefit of the people,
or of any government except the secret super-government, the World Order,
which they serve. The OED further defines a syndic as “a censor of the
actions of another. To accuse.” Here too, the syndicate functions acording to
its definition – the syndicate censors all thought and media, primarily to
protect its own power. It also brings accusations – as many American citizens
have found to their sorrow. Not even Sir Walter Raleigh was immune. When
he interfered with the international money trade, he was accused of “treason”
and beheaded.
The OED defines a “syndicate” as follows : “3. A combination of
capitalists and financiers entered into for the purpose of prosecuting a scheme
requiring large sources of capital, especially one having the object of obtaining
control of the market in a particular commodity. To control, manage or effect
by a syndicate.” Note the key words in this definition – a combination –
prosecuting – obtaining control. The scheme does not require “large capital”
– it requires “large sources of capital”, the bank of England or the Federal
Reserve System.
Corpus Juris Secundum 22A says of Criminal Syndicalism, “In a
prosecution for being a member of an organization which teaches and abets
criminal syndicalism, evidences of crimes committed by past or present
members of the organization in their capacity as members is admissible to
show its character.” People v. LaRue 216 P 627 C.A. 276. Thus testimony
about John Foster Dulles financing the Nazi Government of Germany, his
telegram starting the Korean War, and other evidence can be used to indict
any member of the Rockefeller Foundation in any state or locality in which
the Rockefeller Foundation has ever been active in any way. Since these
organizations are all closely interlocked, and there is so much available
evidence of their illegal operations, it will be relatively simple to obtain
criminal convictions against them for their criminal syndicalist operations.
Corpus Juris Secundum 22, Criminal Law 185 (10); Conspiracy and
Monopolies : “Where the statute makes mere membership in an organization
formed to promote syndicalism a crime, without an overt act, this offense is
indictable in any county into which a member may go during the continuance
of his membership, and this is true although such member comes into a
county involuntarily. People v. Johansen, 226 P 634, 66 C.A. 343.”
Corpus Juris Secundum 22, Criminal Law sec. 182 (3) states, “A
prosecution for conspiracy to commit an offense against the U.S, may also be
tried in any district wherein any overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy is
performed. U.S. v. Cohen C.A.N.J. 197 F 2d 26.” Thus a publication by the
Council on Foreign Relations promoting the stripping of sovereignty of the
United States of America, mailed into any county of the U.S.; the county
authorities can bring the Council on Foreign Relations, or any member
therein, to trial in that county,and any action by any member of the Council
on Foreign Relations in the past is admissible as evidence, such as starting
World War Il, subsidizing the Nazi Government, or subsidizing the USSR.
Criminal syndicalism can also be prosecuted according to Corpus Juris
Secundum 46, Insurrection and Sedition : sec. 461 c. “Sabotage and
syndicalism aiming to abolish the present political and social system, including
direct action or sabotage.” Thus any program of a foundation which seeks to
abolish the present political or social system of the United States can be
prosecuted. Of course every foundation program seeks to accomplish just
that, and is indictable.
Not only individuals, but any corporation supporting criminal
syndicalism can be prosecuted, according to Corpus Juris Secundum 46 462b.
Criminal Syndicalism. “Statutes against criminal syndicalism apply to
corporations as well as to individuals organizing or belonging to criminal
syndicalist society; evidence of the character and activities of other
organizations with which the organization in which the accused is a member is
affiliated is admissible.”
Not only can the members of the World Order be arrested and tried
anywhere, since they function worldwide in their conspiratorial activities to
undermine and overthrow all governments and nations, but because their
organizations are so tightly interlocked, any evidence about any one of them
can be introduced in prosecuting any member of other organizations in any
part of the U.S. or the world. Their attempts to undermine the political and
social orders of all peoples make them subject to legal retribution. The People
of the U.S. must begin at once to enforce the statutes outlawing criminal
syndicalist activities, and bring the criminals to justice.
Being well aware of their danger, the World Order is working frantically
to achieve even greater dictatorial powers over the nations of the world. They
constantly intensify all problems through the foundations, so that political and
economic crises prevent the peoples of the world from organizing against
them. The World Order must paralyze its opponents. They terrorize the
world with propaganda about approaching international nuclear war, although
atomic bombs have been used only once, in 1945, when the Rockefeller
Foundation director Karl T. Compton ordered Truman to drop the atomic
bomb on Japan.

### 
 - Project Humanbeingsfirst.org</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 09:50:43 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

