<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Joe Wilson Vindicated</title>
		<description>Comments for Joe Wilson Vindicated at http://atlanticfreepress.com , comment 1 to 4 out of 4 comments</description>
		<link>http://atlanticfreepress.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:22:06 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>I stand with Joe!</title>
			<link>http://atlanticfreepress.com/news/1/791-joe-wilson-vindicated.html#comment-8540</link>
			<description>Keep yelling, Joe! Dems can't take a little yelling of the TRUTH? Republicans should keep yelling until the usurper is gone. I stand with the Republicans and yell too! OBAMA, WHERE IS YOUR BIRTH CERTIFICATE? - John Cha Cha</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 17:00:29 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Thanks Larry: Proof Bush's 16 words were correct.</title>
			<link>http://atlanticfreepress.com/news/1/791-joe-wilson-vindicated.html#comment-1230</link>
			<description>[i]&quot;The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa&quot; [/i](President Bush, 2003 State of the Union)  

Without the information you presented in the INR memo, Americans might not know that Iraq DID try and get uranium from Niger and may have done so from other African nations.

After all, Saddam did end up with 500 tons of uranium from someplace. - a guest</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 04:37:18 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>To Mr. Strawman</title>
			<link>http://atlanticfreepress.com/news/1/791-joe-wilson-vindicated.html#comment-998</link>
			<description>If you check out http://wid.ap.org/documents/libbytrial/jan25/DX707B.pdf you will find Mr. Wilson's oped &quot;What I didn't find in Africa&quot;.  This was Mr. Wilson's coming out in public on the subject.

In it he says he did not see the documents.

Therefore I think your claim that Mr. Wilson said that he had seen them is wrong.  

Why would a man tell the world he hadn't seen the documents and then tell journalists that he had?

(Unfortunately, The pdf file from an ap dump of court evidence in the Libby case at the link included above is a image copy so I cannot copy the pertinent phrase.  You will have to visit the site yourself for confirmation) - a guest</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 00:31:18 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Strawman, strawman</title>
			<link>http://atlanticfreepress.com/news/1/791-joe-wilson-vindicated.html#comment-948</link>
			<description>Who claimed that Iraq had acquired uranium? Oh, that's right, no one. Golf clap. As for Wilson telling the truth, I think when caught on the fact that he hadn't seen the forged documents - he might have &quot;misspoken&quot;.

Yes, Wilson &quot;misspoke&quot; to several journalists who all got the same spin about the forged documents. Golf clap. - a guest</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 17:28:45 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

