Comments for World War III at http://atlanticfreepress.com , comment 1 to 16 out of 16 comments http://atlanticfreepress.com Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:30:28 +0100 FeedCreator 1.7.3 http://atlanticfreepress.com/news/1/2323-world-war-iii.html#comment-7610 hmmm... all the hyperbole... great for the cheap emotional thrill...lousy for forecasting...looks like that one fellow who forecast your (Swanson's) cry in the night gets the Passage of Time Award for accuracy. Off to the mountains for a bit of springtime snowshoeing. Remember. Eat right, exercise, sleep well, and have some fun. - wallowamountainman :) again Sat, 21 Mar 2009 19:00:21 +0100 http://atlanticfreepress.com/news/1/2323-world-war-iii.html#comment-6170 Well, Swanson... "Impeach or Die" ? Hmmmm...times almost up and there seems to be no wind in the sails of impeachment. Guess that just leaves...well, the hyperbole. - wallowamountainman :) Sun, 14 Sep 2008 18:08:02 +0100 http://atlanticfreepress.com/news/1/2323-world-war-iii.html#comment-4467 I came across World War III. There was potential for a good debate...sidetracked of course by the name callers. I am gonna check out the author's future/past posts to see if anything has change. - wallowamountainman Thu, 07 Feb 2008 19:17:12 +0100 http://atlanticfreepress.com/news/1/2323-world-war-iii.html#comment-4295 it cant be stopped if they decided to start a WWIII. what are we supposed to do. by helping and fighting we are just taking more soilders and possibly killing more men then neccessary. i think that we shouldnt go to war-2 world wars is enough!!! - kookiimonster Thu, 24 Jan 2008 13:56:49 +0100 http://atlanticfreepress.com/news/1/2323-world-war-iii.html#comment-3870 from: http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China/IL15Ad01.html "China Petroleum Corporation, better known as the Sinopec Group, signed a contract with the Iranian Oil Ministry for the development of the Yadavaran oil and gas fields in southwestern Iran." I still hold that an attack on Iran is possible. Insane, but possible. Impeachment as a tool for stopping it? Not insane, just not possible. Demos are giving GW everything he wants without even a fight, i.e a vote to stop the funding to either losing war effort. Fear of the threat of veto or fear of the threat of filibuster ring out as the reasons. Fear of threats. How ironic is that. - MeAgainAgain 12/14/07 Fri, 14 Dec 2007 18:08:02 +0100 http://atlanticfreepress.com/news/1/2323-world-war-iii.html#comment-3226 from the article: "We will have taught every nation, again, that the only path to safety is acquisition of nuclear weapons." from the Unconcerned American: "Nations will not seek nuclear weaponry for defense. That only results in an excuse for being attacked. They will, however, seek mutual defense alliances with countries big enough to make attacks on them untenable. The bigger players will divide up the world further into their spheres of 'influence'. " From the Asia Times Online: http://www.atimes.com/ atimes/Middle_East/IJ18Ak01.html - MeAgain Wed, 17 Oct 2007 17:18:17 +0100 http://atlanticfreepress.com/news/1/2323-world-war-iii.html#comment-3023 life to short to go war whats the point there are not going to listen if that do i will not be going to war i know that one - a guest Fri, 14 Sep 2007 22:54:07 +0100 http://atlanticfreepress.com/news/1/2323-world-war-iii.html#comment-2966 so, if congress do go ahead with milertary action against Iran, will it happen while bush is in office? - a guest Sat, 08 Sep 2007 23:21:37 +0100 http://atlanticfreepress.com/news/1/2323-world-war-iii.html#comment-2962 Hear ye, Hear ye! Am I the only one who thinks that gentlemen such as "Unconcerned Amerikan" have completely lost all everything it means to be American? Our nation has been hijacked by cretins of the worst sort! These pathetic neo-cowards have done nothing but destroy the foundations by which America has achieved all of it's greatness. Is it too far fetched to simply say the truth? It is without cause to alarm others of these malfeasence? The founding fathers warned us against exactly what is happening, and you are unconcerned? The obvious goal of this admin has been to destroy the U.S.A.. Think about it, what have they done to promote the acceptance of America towards other religions (founding feature)...nothing. What have they done to calm the nation of Islams' concerns...nothing. What have they done to secure our borders to make sure only those with good intent enter...nothing. Enron, and Halliburton are the obvious positions of this Admin regarding the economy. Pure self interest. That's it. I could go into civil liberties, politizing the DoJ, anywhere you turn these neo-cowards have driven their arm elbow deep into our orifice! But everybody is fine. Nobody cares. We'll all be "raptured away" the morons say. I'm obviously fed up with all of you apathetic fools! If you are a homophobe, it's the first sign of being a homo. If you say it's "both sides of the isle" it is obvious that you are partly to blame for the nations current state and you are just saving face. Those who continue to support the nitwit in the office or the repigs that will eventually start WW3 really need to take a hard look in the mirror and ask themselves, has it been worth your own pride to destroy the only safe haven the world has ever known? - a guest Fri, 07 Sep 2007 22:51:35 +0100 http://atlanticfreepress.com/news/1/2323-world-war-iii.html#comment-2918 is a a great example of my being bettor off as unconcerned. The residual feelings also indicates that it is time to stop posting here. - a guest Wed, 05 Sep 2007 21:51:04 +0100 http://atlanticfreepress.com/news/1/2323-world-war-iii.html#comment-2917 A definition is presumed that is not mandated by usage. From answers.com: 'Not anxious or apprehensive; unworried.' That analysis is done without anxiety or apprehensive is a trait that allows room for logical analysis and that is the methodology this unconcerned american employs as best able. My posts state observations or disagreement about content, not about the authors. My posts tend to make predictions that time will allow review for accuracy. My posts are as best able 'packaged neatly' for purposes of discussion. My posts do fit in a 'small world' but in that small world context has changed and changes constantly (with great assistance from the like of Arthur Silber, Chris Floyd, Chris Hallquist, Juan Cole, etc). My posts also fit the stated requirements written just above the space provided for 'Website' as are all posts. To allow a post that blames the author of another post for 'no small part' in the ongoing repetition of the acts of war and empire building is not consistent with those stated requirements. This unconcerned american suggests to all concerned that during attempts to be analytical that the concerned set aside the emotions and look to see what is written. To project blame is a nonsequitor. Interestingly enough for additional comment is what the allowance of the post of the blamer suggests about the AFP: First, that my other post were viewed by the AFP from the context of 'unconcerned' provided by the blamer. That they were still posted is noteworthy accomplishment for the AFP. Second, that the AFP apparently has grown weary enough of my name to allow a public rebuke. A less noteworthy accomplish for the AFP. Having now become concerned over the content of the blamer's post, the AFP's posting of that comment, and the ability to track this once unconcerned american down through nominal internet skills, perhaps running away is the safest thing to do. On the other hand, if the government is as capable of reading as the blamer and the AFP are, perhaps they think this concerned american is 'on their side' How ironic... Once again, unconcerned amercian - a guest Wed, 05 Sep 2007 20:06:07 +0100 http://atlanticfreepress.com/news/1/2323-world-war-iii.html#comment-2910 unconcerned....you are right about one thing,history certainly does repeat itself...and you and all others who remain 'unconcerned'play no small part in the repetition.you seem to have neatly packaged up your views,to fit into your small world.... - a guest Tue, 04 Sep 2007 21:07:09 +0100 http://atlanticfreepress.com/news/1/2323-world-war-iii.html#comment-2906 be at war. Neither China nor Russia will join in (perhaps by established agreement as far as China). England will not be at war; European Union not; Japan not; Canada not; Mexico not; most of Africa not; South America not; etc not. The United States will continue to be at war and Israel may actively join. Reaction may be world wide but will not be directed world wide. Rather it will be focused. Iran will be the last invasion made by the U.S. because China and Russia will insist upon lines drawn across which further invasions threaten their economic securities. This does not mean the U.S. will not respond to 'invitations' by certain regimes to help quell the 'terrorist' rebellions in their countries. Nations will not seek nuclear weaponry for defense. That only results in an excuse for being attacked. They will, however, seek mutual defense alliances with countries big enough to make attacks on them untenable. The bigger players will divide up the world further into their spheres of 'influence'. A nuclear scenario exist only if Israel is being overrun. It will not be the U.S. that uses them. Assuming there is a legal basis for impeachment, impeachment is irrelevant because both parties want the same thing. How does one know that? One just has to take off the blinders and look at the results. Not only have no actions been taken to stop anything, laws have been passed virtually unanimously that have only strengthened the pathway of presidential power and action taken in the 'war' on terror. Impeachment is not going to happen. To suggest that 'die' is the mandated alternative is not accurate. Life will continue for most, though death will certainly visit the innocent more frequently then the guilty. History will, as it does, repeat itself. - a guest Tue, 04 Sep 2007 18:28:27 +0100 http://atlanticfreepress.com/news/1/2323-world-war-iii.html#comment-2904 my god ! what is up with you sitting ducks ? david swanson is correct and it is not an exageration !when will you realize that all extemists ours and theirs are pieced from the same suit.if you are not an extremist, than you are an average citizen of america or afganistan or iraq or iran.and you and i have everything to lose by pointing out petty differences and not focusing on the real enemy of ALL !!the rulers all around this world that contol the weapons of war and the economics and the resources that any common man or woman -ANYWHERE,will need to live... WAKE UP YOU THICK-SKULLED BASTARDS....now what are we gonna do about it,i wish i knew......i am a bastard,too....because i do not know how to fix it... - a guest Tue, 04 Sep 2007 17:59:23 +0100 http://atlanticfreepress.com/news/1/2323-world-war-iii.html#comment-2903 Everything is in the title Mr previous guest. It all depends on your point of view. There is only one certainty : Both parts are responsible for what's going on. - a guest Tue, 04 Sep 2007 16:46:18 +0100 http://atlanticfreepress.com/news/1/2323-world-war-iii.html#comment-2901 I have gone through your site which was written by David Swanson.Here he took the example of "America and Iraq(n).If the world war 3 start then no people live on this earth Islamic countries has to get realize and should stop.Because only the problem is that terrorism terriests are cameing from Islamic countries.However nice article written by David Swanson.Very recently i visited one site which closely relates to your site it's all about [b]world war[/b] - a guest Tue, 04 Sep 2007 11:18:56 +0100