Comments for Romney and the Mormon Question at http://atlanticfreepress.com , comment 1 to 3 out of 3 comments http://atlanticfreepress.com Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:46:11 +0100 FeedCreator 1.7.3 http://atlanticfreepress.com/news/1/1605-romney-and-the-mormon-question.html#comment-2196 And then there is John Doolittle M.C., California 4th and Orrin Hatch, Senator, Utah as well as Bennett from Utah. Doolittle though under FBI investigation narrowly won the last election because of his being Mormon in a District with a heavy Mormon population, where many, even though he may be innocent until charged or proven guilty has used to his advantage, even in the light of very questionable ethic, his religion to his political advantage. Nevada is not a Mormon state. Utah is almost totally and some areas of CA have major populations. And Romney continue to waffle on issues he claimed to have been firm on as Gov. of Mass. Sometimes location is everything. With the Southern Baptist being the largest of the evangelicals who consider Mormonism a cult, Romeny may have considerable difficulties below the Mason-Dixon line. - a guest Sun, 20 May 2007 06:55:30 +0100 http://atlanticfreepress.com/news/1/1605-romney-and-the-mormon-question.html#comment-2192 The correct way of printing the Mormon church name is: The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints not: the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (Make sure that you get the capital letters right - specifically the 'd') - a guest Sat, 19 May 2007 20:41:29 +0100 http://atlanticfreepress.com/news/1/1605-romney-and-the-mormon-question.html#comment-2191 More bearing false witness against Mormons by Evangelical Christian groups. One has to ask, "What motivates this kind of question?" There are many U.S. senators, congressman and governors who are Mormon. IN fact, Mitt Romney was a Mormon governor. Harry Reid leads the Senate: again another Mormon. In all of the years that these men have served, they have never had to serve "two masters" and nothing they have said or done has been a cause for concern. - a guest Sat, 19 May 2007 20:08:13 +0100