<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Channel 4's Climate Swindle - The Distortions Continue</title>
		<description>Comments for Channel 4's Climate Swindle - The Distortions Continue at http://atlanticfreepress.com , comment 1 to 3 out of 3 comments</description>
		<link>http://atlanticfreepress.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:53:36 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>“The Great Global Warming Swindle” is itself a Fraud and a Swindle</title>
			<link>http://atlanticfreepress.com/news/1/1218-channel-4s-climate-swindle-the-distortions-continue.html#comment-1863</link>
			<description>   “The Great Global Warming Swindle” is a pseudo-documentary in which British television producer Martin Durkin has fraudulently misrepresented both the data involved and scientists who have researched global climate. Movie director Durkin has willfully misrepresented the facts about global warming just to advocate his own agenda. The program was originally aired on England’s “Channel 4” (The “Supermarket Tabloid” of the airwaves). In the past, “Channel 4” has had to broadcast a prime-time apology for broadcasting another of Martin Durkin’s “sleazebag” pseudo-documentaries.

   I have much more at the above web page including information about the &quot;credentials&quot; of the &quot;experts&quot; in the program.

Bill Butler - a guest</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 07:26:58 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Chuck_Norris</title>
			<link>http://atlanticfreepress.com/news/1/1218-channel-4s-climate-swindle-the-distortions-continue.html#comment-1759</link>
			<description>Why can't it be a mixture of both?
Why are both sides intent on it being either one way or the other?

Is this a natural thing, or are we causing more than our fair share of global warming?
Solid, undeniable proof is needed before I make my mind up. - a guest</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 21:44:35 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>An 'Inconvenient' Question</title>
			<link>http://atlanticfreepress.com/news/1/1218-channel-4s-climate-swindle-the-distortions-continue.html#comment-1754</link>
			<description>In the past the earth has been much warmer than it is now (e.g. the medieval warm period).  Human activity didn't cause that warming.  And during that long warm period the inhabitants of the planet thrived.  As far as I know, this is not in dispute and completely undermines the idea that there is a 'crisis' now when no one is predicting that the earth's temperature is going to rise to that previous level.

What is so threatening about the evidence the sun's normal cycles and how it affects our atmosphere are largely responsible for the changes in climate that have been taking place since the beginning of the earth's existence?
Since the sun is the main engine that drives the weather on our planet, should it be any surprise that it would be the main actor involved in long-term changes to the climates of the earth?  

What is the 'proper' temperature for the planet? 

Can you please address these common-sense arguments? - a guest</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 04:50:47 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

